• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

bcbsr

Newbie
Mar 17, 2003
4,085
2,325
Visit site
✟209,036.00
Faith
Christian
Back then, using Ephesians as the analogy again, they needed an emphasis of 2:8-9, and today, we need all three full verses, as Paul wrote them, 8-10.
Yet contrary to salvation by works Christians Paul does not say, "created in Christ Jesus to do good works (in order to be saved)". Rather the verses show the proper place of works - that being that salvation is not contingent upon works but rather works are an effect of being saved.

For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith— and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— not by works, so that no one can boast. For we are God’s workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.

The good news is not salvation by works.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Halbhh
Upvote 0

Not David

Antiochian Orthodox
Apr 6, 2018
7,393
5,277
26
USA
✟242,927.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
That's the Catholic viewpoint of reading James into Paul. But as I pointed out many times (even to you in particular), you cannot reconcile Romans 4 with a salvation by works scenario, let alone with the rest of Paul's writings.
It is the teaching of all Apostolic Churches: Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox and the Assyrian Church of the East.

"But I discipline my body and bring it into subjection, lest, when I have preached to others, I myself should become disqualified" (1 Corinthians 9:27)

Do you think someone who believes in faith alone would say that?
 
Upvote 0

Not David

Antiochian Orthodox
Apr 6, 2018
7,393
5,277
26
USA
✟242,927.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Yet contrary to salvation by works Christians Paul does not say, "created in Christ Jesus to do good works (in order to be saved)". Rather the verses show the proper place of works - that being that salvation is not contingent upon works but rather works are an effect of being saved.

For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith— and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— not by works, so that no one can boast. For we are God’s workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.

The good news is not salvation by works.
Since Paul's always mentions circumcision and the Jewish law then we all know what "works" is really about.
 
Upvote 0

bcbsr

Newbie
Mar 17, 2003
4,085
2,325
Visit site
✟209,036.00
Faith
Christian
It is the teaching of all Apostolic Churches: Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox and the Assyrian Church of the East.

"But I discipline my body and bring it into subjection, lest, when I have preached to others, I myself should become disqualified" (1 Corinthians 9:27)

Do you think someone who believes in faith alone would say that?
1Cor 9:27 he's not talking about salvation but rather rewards for services rendered (See also 1Cor 3:11-15)

Also, being Berean my faith is based upon scripture and not upon sectarian dogma, not that of the Orthodox denomination or any other.
 
Upvote 0

bcbsr

Newbie
Mar 17, 2003
4,085
2,325
Visit site
✟209,036.00
Faith
Christian
Since Paul's always mentions circumcision and the Jewish law then we all know what "works" is really about.
If you read the context you'll note he's talking generically about works and mentions nothing of circumcision nor "the works of the Law" in the Romans 4:1-8 passage.

Consider Rom 4:4 Now when a man works, his wages are not credited to him as a gift, but as an obligation.

You seem to interpret that to mean "Now when a man gets circumcised, his wages for getting circumcised are not credited as a gift, but as an obligation". Well, good luck trying to convince people that's the way it should be read. Those of us who exercise basic reading comprehension skills find no need to twist the scriptures in that manner.
 
Upvote 0

Not David

Antiochian Orthodox
Apr 6, 2018
7,393
5,277
26
USA
✟242,927.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
1Cor 9:27 he's not talking about salvation but rather rewards for services rendered (See also 1Cor 3:11-15)
Also, being Berean my faith is based upon scripture and not upon sectarian dogma, not that of the Orthodox denomination or any other.
How would Paul had been disqualified then?
The Berean were Orthodox.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Not David

Antiochian Orthodox
Apr 6, 2018
7,393
5,277
26
USA
✟242,927.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
If you read the context you'll note he's talking generically about works and mentions nothing of circumcision nor "the works of the Law" in the Romans 4:1-8 passage.

Consider Rom 4:4 Now when a man works, his wages are not credited to him as a gift, but as an obligation.

You seem to interpret that to mean "Now when a man gets circumcised, his wages for getting circumcised are not credited as a gift, but as an obligation". Well, good luck trying to convince people that's the way it should be read. Those of us who exercise basic reading comprehension skills find no need to twist the scriptures in that manner.
"Is this blessedness only for the circumcised, or also for the uncircumcised? We have been saying that Abraham’s faith was credited to him as righteousness. 10 Under what circumstances was it credited? Was it after he was circumcised, or before? It was not after, but before! 11 And he received circumcision as a sign, a seal of the righteousness that he had by faith while he was still uncircumcised. So then, he is the father of all who believe but have not been circumcised, in order that righteousness might be credited to them. 12 And he is then also the father of the circumcised who not only are circumcised but who also follow in the footsteps of the faith that our father Abraham had before he was circumcised. 13 It was not through the law that Abraham and his offspring received the promise that he would be heir of the world, but through the righteousness that comes by faith. 14 For if those who depend on the law are heirs, faith means nothing and the promise is worthless, 15 because the law brings wrath. And where there is no law there is no transgression."

This comes right after your verse and complements what I have been saying about circumcision and the Jewish law
 
Upvote 0

bcbsr

Newbie
Mar 17, 2003
4,085
2,325
Visit site
✟209,036.00
Faith
Christian
How would Paul had been disqualified then?
The Berean were Orthodox.
True Bereans hold no allegiance to denominational dogma but rather scrutinize all things in light of scripture. In contrast Orthodox advocate interpreting scripture in light of tradition, so tradition trumps scripture. That's not Berean.
 
Upvote 0

bcbsr

Newbie
Mar 17, 2003
4,085
2,325
Visit site
✟209,036.00
Faith
Christian
"Is this blessedness only for the circumcised, or also for the uncircumcised? We have been saying that Abraham’s faith was credited to him as righteousness. 10 Under what circumstances was it credited? Was it after he was circumcised, or before? It was not after, but before! 11 And he received circumcision as a sign, a seal of the righteousness that he had by faith while he was still uncircumcised. So then, he is the father of all who believe but have not been circumcised, in order that righteousness might be credited to them. 12 And he is then also the father of the circumcised who not only are circumcised but who also follow in the footsteps of the faith that our father Abraham had before he was circumcised. 13 It was not through the law that Abraham and his offspring received the promise that he would be heir of the world, but through the righteousness that comes by faith. 14 For if those who depend on the law are heirs, faith means nothing and the promise is worthless, 15 because the law brings wrath. And where there is no law there is no transgression."

This comes right after your verse and complements what I have been saying about circumcision and the Jewish law
And if you were to exercise basic reading comprehension skills you will note that first Paul makes in clear in the beginning that salvation is not by works generically, and then he notes that salvation is also not by circumcision or the law of Moses.

And you have failed, in light of the proof I have given, to rebut my viewpoint of Romans 4:4,5, and as such I take it you've conceded.
 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,340
9,285
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,223,341.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yet contrary to salvation by works Christians Paul does not say, "created in Christ Jesus to do good works (in order to be saved)". Rather the verses show the proper place of works - that being that salvation is not contingent upon works but rather works are an effect of being saved.

For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith— and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— not by works, so that no one can boast. For we are God’s workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.

The good news is not salvation by works.

To everyone:

At times we want to ask a question (I have) like --

'Where are these people (anywhere??) that think they are earning their salvation on their own without Christ, by their own works, without Christ?'

Aren't such very rare? Perhaps there is a tiny handful that imagine they are saving themselves on their own good deeds (that is, without Christ, not by the gift of God, not by Grace), by their own works alone. But where are they?

I've said more than once or twice also: "They must be very rare, as I've not been able to find them."

I've said even: "Show me where they are, so that I can bring them the Good News." and that was sincere.

I cannot identify any here at CF, though I've read a lot of posts in these kinds of threads about faith and works.

I know perfectly well that for example Catholics say they are saved by Grace through faith in their own wordings.

They believe works are also required of us (as do most protestants as best I can tell from a great many conversations, for that matter).


Also we can ask the inverse:

'Where are the people (are there any?), who truly think that they are saved by Grace through faith and also think they can perfectly fine have zero fruit, zero doing as Christ said, who really do throw out the epistle of James (and for that matter those of Peter, John, and Paul, all) out by using only select passages from Paul and maybe a few selected verses from the gospels isolated from others, and ignore the remainder of Paul, of all the other epistles, really over 90% of all the New Testament? '

Perhaps I (we) should also say: "Where are they? I don't think I've been able to find any here."

(though I admit I may have found one somewhere else on another site, though it's not clear since the person blocked me suddenly after just 1 comment where I simply pointed out Ephesians 2:10 and said we must do as Christ commanded us to do).

Yes, I know there are a very few perhaps, but....maybe they are just more rare than we would guess, I'm thinking.

Instead, one thing that does happen naturally in all discussions, inevitably, is that people misguess about what the other person believes/assumes, various things that persons hasn't clearly stated.

When person A thinks person B is claiming their works save them, cause salvation, and person B thinks person A is claiming zero works is ok....

...what's actually happening very often is that both person A and person B don't yet have the full list/knowing of what the other believes -- they just have part. Therefore caution on reaching a conclusion is best.

I best wait for person Z to say clearly to me in some way: "having zero fruits/works is just fine even for Christians that have been saved for years" before I conclude that's what they believe.

They probably do not believe such. Experience shows me that usually they don't think that, and don't follow that, but instead, they only have different wordings when talking (even use the same words to mean different things; e.g. 'works' for instance, to mean radically different things) and also emphasize different aspects, to begin with, according to their own personal background/experiences/challenges/lessons.

Often: All along person A and person B largely have the same views.

But they use different wordings, unfamiliar to the other, and also different emphasis.

It's not that there are zero differences in understandings and beliefs. It's that we tend to emphasize what's different and then also guess further past what actually is, pretty often.

It's like even though we are using English, we still have different...dialects.

It's like the Tower of Babel isn't truly diminished (or not a lot). Still mostly in effect.

So, when a person now questions on either side, I do not assume they are on one side as if to set faith against works, or works against faith. I assume they have a different emphasis according to their own life background, where they are coming out of, the historical mistakes their church battled for instance, or such. They often are prescribing a corrective to a problem they identified.

As it seems in my memory: We are simply saved only by grace, through faith, and not by works. It is the gift of God, lest any should boast. For we are created in Christ Jesus to do the good works which God has prepared for us to do.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

bcbsr

Newbie
Mar 17, 2003
4,085
2,325
Visit site
✟209,036.00
Faith
Christian
To everyone:

At times we want to ask a question (I have) like --

'Where are these people (anywhere??) that think they are earning their salvation on their own without Christ, by their own works, without Christ?'

Aren't such very rare? Perhaps there is a tiny handful that imagine they are saving themselves on their own good deeds (that is, without Christ, not by the gift of God, not by Grace), by their own works alone. But where are they?

I've said more than once or twice also: "They must be very rare, as I've not been able to find them."

I've said even: "Show me where they are, so that I can bring them the Good News." and that was sincere.

I cannot identify any here at CF, though I've read a lot of posts in these kinds of threads about faith and works.

I know perfectly well that for example Catholics say they are saved by Grace through faith in their own wordings.

They believe works are also required of us (as do most protestants as best I can tell from a great many conversations, for that matter).


Also we can ask the inverse:

'Where are the people (are there any?), who truly think that they are saved by Grace through faith and also think they can perfectly fine have zero fruit, zero doing as Christ said, who really do throw out the epistle of James (and for that matter those of Peter, John, and Paul, all) out by using only select passages from Paul and maybe a few selected verses from the gospels isolated from others, and ignore the remainder of Paul, of all the other epistles, really over 90% of all the New Testament? '

Perhaps I (we) should also say: "Where are they? I don't think I've been able to find any here."

(though I admit I may have found one somewhere else on another site, though it's not clear since the person blocked me suddenly after just 1 comment where I simply pointed out Ephesians 2:10 and said we must do as Christ commanded us to do).

Yes, I know there are a very few perhaps, but....maybe they are just more rare than we would guess, I'm thinking.

Instead, one thing that does happen naturally in all discussions, inevitably, is that people misguess about what the other person believes/assumes, various things that persons hasn't clearly stated.

When person A thinks person B is claiming their works save them, cause salvation, and person B thinks person A is claiming zero works is ok....

...what's actually happening very often is that both person A and person B don't yet have the full list/knowing of what the other believes -- they just have part. Therefore caution on reaching a conclusion is best.

I best wait for person Z to say clearly to me in some way: "having zero fruits/works is just fine even for Christians that have been saved for years" before I conclude that's what they believe.

They probably do not believe such. Experience shows me that usually they don't think that, and don't follow that, but instead, they only have different wordings when talking (even use the same words to mean different things; e.g. 'works' for instance, to mean radically different things) and also emphasize different aspects, to begin with, according to their own personal background/experiences/challenges/lessons.

Often: All along person A and person B largely have the same views.

But they use different wordings, unfamiliar to the other, and also different emphasis.

It's not that there are zero differences in understandings and beliefs. It's that we tend to emphasize what's different and then also guess further past what actually is, pretty often.

It's like even though we are using English, we still have different...dialects.

It's like the Tower of Babel isn't truly diminished (or not a lot). Still mostly in effect.

So, when a person now questions on either side, I do not assume they are on one side as if to set faith against works, or works against faith. I assume they have a different emphasis according to their own life background, where they are coming out of, the historical mistakes their church battled for instance, or such. They often are proscribing a corrective to a problem they identified.

As it seems in my memory: We are simply saved only by grace, through faith, and not by works. It is the gift of God, lest any should boast. For we are created in Christ Jesus to do the good works which God has prepared for us to do.
From my experience on CF I'd say about half of the people view salvation as conditioned upon one's performance.
 
Upvote 0

Not David

Antiochian Orthodox
Apr 6, 2018
7,393
5,277
26
USA
✟242,927.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
True Bereans hold no allegiance to denominational dogma but rather scrutinize all things in light of scripture. In contrast Orthodox advocate interpreting scripture in light of tradition, so tradition trumps scripture. That's not Berean.
What was the Scripture the Bereans use? It was the Old Testament.
And Paul was the same person who said "hold to the traditions we told you either by word or by letter".
Plus, my Church has a 2000 years History not a 100 "non-denominational" one.
 
Upvote 0

Not David

Antiochian Orthodox
Apr 6, 2018
7,393
5,277
26
USA
✟242,927.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
And if you were to exercise basic reading comprehension skills you will note that first Paul makes in clear in the beginning that salvation is not by works generically, and then he notes that salvation is also not by circumcision or the law of Moses.

And you have failed, in light of the proof I have given, to rebut my viewpoint of Romans 4:4,5, and as such I take it you've conceded.
I don't need to rebute it, I already showed how my point applied.
Plus, nobody believes in salvation by works alone.
 
Upvote 0

bcbsr

Newbie
Mar 17, 2003
4,085
2,325
Visit site
✟209,036.00
Faith
Christian
What was the Scripture the Bereans use? It was the Old Testament.
And Paul was the same person who said "hold to the traditions we told you either by word or by letter".
Plus, my Church has a 2000 years History not a 100 "non-denominational" one.
He said "we told you". Paul was an apostle and thus what he wrote was scripture. This as opposed to post-Biblical "Church Fathers" whose "tradition" was not itself scripture.

Just like many other denominations, Orthodox essentially makes man-made traditions and human dogma equivalent to scripture. Bereans don't.
 
Upvote 0

bcbsr

Newbie
Mar 17, 2003
4,085
2,325
Visit site
✟209,036.00
Faith
Christian
I don't need to rebute it, I already showed how my point applied.
Plus, nobody believes in salvation by works alone.
Yet plenty, including yourself, view salvation as being contingent upon one's ongoing performance. Thus such people put their faith in their own performance to save them rather than putting their faith in Christ.
 
Upvote 0

bcbsr

Newbie
Mar 17, 2003
4,085
2,325
Visit site
✟209,036.00
Faith
Christian
"Workout your salvation with fear and trembling".
Work out, don't work for. The saved work out applications of their faith. And they do so not in order to be saved, but rather because they have been saved and are eternally secure, having been born of God. It's their nature.

In contrast those who work for their salvation don't believe the gospel. For Paul writes, "Now when a man works, his wages are not credited to him as a gift, but as an obligation. However, to the man who does not work but trusts God who justifies the wicked, his faith is credited as righteousness." Rom 4:4,5
 
Upvote 0

Not David

Antiochian Orthodox
Apr 6, 2018
7,393
5,277
26
USA
✟242,927.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
He said "we told you". Paul was an apostle and thus what he wrote was scripture. This as opposed to post-Biblical "Church Fathers" whose "tradition" was not itself scripture.

Just like many other denominations, Orthodox essentially makes man-made traditions and human dogma equivalent to scripture. Bereans don't.
Because the Church founded by Christ is a man-made stuff?
And I see you didn't answer me with the age of your church.
You know that all of Christians for 1000 or 1500 years believed something closer to me than to you?
I guess every single one of them was wrong.
 
Upvote 0