An alcoholic who has been clean and sober fifty years still considers himself an alcoholic and calls himself one in the context of his AA meetings.
It is a worldly program. So they are not perfect. If they have overcome their sin of alcoholism and they do not desire to drink again, then they are no longer an alcoholic. Just as a fire fighter who retires is no longer a fire fighter.
You said:
In a similar manner, Paul said that it is a trustworthy saying and worthy of all acceptation that "Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of whom I am chief."
12 "And I thank Christ Jesus our Lord, who hath enabled me, for that he counted me faithful, putting me into the ministry;
13
Who was before a blasphemer, and a persecutor, and injurious: but I obtained mercy, because I did
it ignorantly in unbelief." (1 Timothy 1:12-13).
Paul is saying he used to be a persecutor of Christians and he later obtained mercy.
Also, the same chapter says:
9 "Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers,
10 For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;
11 According to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, which was committed to my trust." (1 Timothy 1:9-11).
The Law is not made for a righteous man but for the lawless and disobedient. For the ungodly, and for sinners and for anything contrary to sound doctrine.
You said:
I am of the opinion that Paul wants every one of us to adopt this saying, including the part of it that admits that I am the chief of sinners. As I should say it, so you should say it.
Of course, Paul called himself the chief of sinners in the present tense even though he was formerly a blasphemer, and a persecutor, and injurious.
So when I call myself a justified sinner, I call myself that in the same sense that Paul said that he was the chief of sinners.
But we have the context of Paul's other words that says he is referring to his old life here when he said that. By your phrase, you are not giving that impression by such a statement. For do you believe that believers always will still sin every day and yet they are still saved? Was not King David saved even while he commited his sins of adultery and murder in your view? Would not David be a justified sinner in the present tense?
Are you boasting?
You said:
For many years I sought to promote the idea of sinless perfection for salvation and came up at a dead end so many times that now I have chosen to take the opposite side of the spectrum with people who are passionate about the subject in order to draw out from them some fighting words that will convince me of the reality of the issue once again.
We never had the same experience. I never thought Sinless Perfectionism was a salvation issue. I understood that not all sins are the same based on what Scripture says and what real life says. But do not trick yourself into thinking grievous sin cannot separate a believer from God unless they repent of such a sin. For one of the first lies of the devil was to convince Eve that she and her husband would not die if she broke God's laws (i.e. if they sinned). The same lie is being pushed today. "....You can sin and still be saved."
Because in seeing that the people who normally opposed my pov as a proponent of entire sanctification were born again believers; and because I considered that Philippians 2:3 needed to be my attitude towards them, I finally realized that they were right and I was wrong:
But you did not have an understanding on the dark side of OSAS and the ton of Scripture verses that refute it like I have. That is something I cannot unlearn or ignore. Maybe you can do that, but I cannot ignore God's Word in what it says, friend. You would have a better chance at convincing me that rain is not wet or I don't breath air, etc.
and that salvation is primarily the forgiveness of sins and not the attaining of worthiness.
"He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me." (Matthew 10:37).
"And he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me." (Matthew 10:38).
You said:
We will obtain worthiness when we receive our glorified bodies. But before this we are clothed in His robes of righteousness; and also we are justified as the ungodly; our faith is counted as righteousness (Romans 4:5). He forgives us, He covers our sins; and He also will not ever impute sin to us if we place our trust in His finished work (Romans 4:6-8, John 19:30).
It grieves me greatly that you would switch sides so quickly, but I do not think you were ever truly convinced that holiness was essential like I believed it to be. The imputation of Christ also includes walking in the light (1 John 1:7). For Christ is the author of eternal salvation to all who OBEY Him (See Hebrews 5:9). For the grace of God teaches us to deny ungodliness and that we should live righteously and godly in this present world.