...certainly you understand the contextual differences between a group that's been marginalized (and at one point, owned) for decades and decades expressing a sense pride and empowerment at the fact that their circumstance of birth is no longer being abused in the ways it once was, vs. people from the group that was doing the oppressing, who do so as a reactionary response to the fact that the former group is no longer being legally identified as second class,...or to a lesser degree, as a disingenuous ploy to try to trap the other side in a double-standard, right?
Or, in more plain terms, chants of "Black Power" and "White Power" (when evaluating the actual context behind both slogans) aren't purely opposite sides of the same coin as some people like to disingenuously portray it as.
"Black Power" is a sentiment expressing the positive feelings and pride the black community has over the fact that they, for a long time, had a disproportionately less amount of power, and are now moving toward having an equitable place at the table, and their desire to keep moving in that direction
"White Power" is a slogan/sentiment that was a negative reactionary response by bigots who were mad & jaded at the fact that their prejudices were no longer being supported by codified laws and feel threatened by the fact that society doesn't view the people they, personally, don't like as second class citizens.