- Jun 9, 2016
- 859
- 641
- 28
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Agnostic
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
While I admire the message that the song itself portrays, the like 'who the (BEEP) is he?' makes my stomach turn sour in a spiritual sense and I wrote a poem about the matter which can be viewed here: I Am Not by ChristIsSovereign
Yet while I admire the message, I see the message being butchered by the use of the word. The LORD specifically tells us to not let filth come out of our mouth. How is a message supposed to be shared when the verse is explicitly disobeyed in the process. It's like a pastor saying, 'FOLLOW THE (BEEP)ING LORD' or something. It's inexcusable.
From what I see, the Christian version of the album has the track excluded, which I suppose is a good thing, but the fact that they, for a long time, wanted to use that word in the song... I don't want to be judgmental but it makes me question if they're actually truly Christians.
Also, from my behavior years ago as an Internet hateposter/spammer, I know about controversy. And there was a lot of controversy surrounding the song. The commenters would fit into five camps, starting with the most numerous and going to the least common.
1. Christians who are on board with the 'raw and honest' usage of the said vulgar word.
2. Christians who (in my opinion, rightly) decried the usage of the said vulgar word but approved of the overall message.
3. Christians who (read above) decried the usage of the said vulgar word, saying it tainted the message completely. I view the song this way, personally.
4. Atheists who love the song.
5. Atheists who tell the Christians to 'get over it, it's just a (beep)ing song.'
The artists who created the song knew that it would yield these sort of reactions, according to the interview. Why can't I get the thought out of my head that they intentionally sowed a seed of discord? It's very, very troubling.
Yet while I admire the message, I see the message being butchered by the use of the word. The LORD specifically tells us to not let filth come out of our mouth. How is a message supposed to be shared when the verse is explicitly disobeyed in the process. It's like a pastor saying, 'FOLLOW THE (BEEP)ING LORD' or something. It's inexcusable.
From what I see, the Christian version of the album has the track excluded, which I suppose is a good thing, but the fact that they, for a long time, wanted to use that word in the song... I don't want to be judgmental but it makes me question if they're actually truly Christians.
Also, from my behavior years ago as an Internet hateposter/spammer, I know about controversy. And there was a lot of controversy surrounding the song. The commenters would fit into five camps, starting with the most numerous and going to the least common.
1. Christians who are on board with the 'raw and honest' usage of the said vulgar word.
2. Christians who (in my opinion, rightly) decried the usage of the said vulgar word but approved of the overall message.
3. Christians who (read above) decried the usage of the said vulgar word, saying it tainted the message completely. I view the song this way, personally.
4. Atheists who love the song.
5. Atheists who tell the Christians to 'get over it, it's just a (beep)ing song.'
The artists who created the song knew that it would yield these sort of reactions, according to the interview. Why can't I get the thought out of my head that they intentionally sowed a seed of discord? It's very, very troubling.