- Jun 4, 2013
- 10,132
- 996
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Widowed
- Politics
- US-Others
There is such a thing as Google. Why can evolutionists never do their own research when they decide to bring a subject up in the first place? But here, wouldn’t want to make you have to learn how to research.First, can you please give a reference or a link for these statements, particularly that the 3-metre gap exists worldwide and its thickness is the same everywhere?
Closing the 'three metre gap'
So far a set of tracks, two bones, and recently a single brow bone is all that’s been found in this 3 meters. Yet dinosaur bones are found in profusion before this gap, and not a single one after it or in the K-T boundary.
No, neither of us were correct. They claim it represents a period of around 100,000 years.Second, three metres of sedimentary rock do not equate to 'several million years'. If one divides the maximum thicknesses of the rocks of the geological periods by the durations of those periods, one obtains a maximum deposition rate, averaged over the period, of about 200 metres per million years. At this rate of deposition, three metres of rock would represent about 15,000 years. Whatever the cause of the gap, it appears that the time that it represents is much less than a million years.
But then that’s assuming constant deposition of layers, and refusing to adjust clocks for time dilation.
So all dinosaur bones are found buried in sediment before this 3 meter gap, except perhaps the few that survived this global flood that escaped to high ground and then died out slowly before the K-T event occurred. No one is arguing against a meteor striking the earth and impacting life severely, the life that survived the flood that happened 100,000 years before the event.
Yet after the K-T boundary we find fossilized mammals in profusion. The problem is no one wants to discuss what’s found in that 3 meter gap, just not dinosaurs. So that the K-T impact killed of small mammals is not doubted, it’s only too bad dinosaurs were already well on their way to extinction 100,000 years earlier when that global flood occurred that buried them in sediment. Not saying some didn’t survive that were able to escape to high ground. I simply expect they didn’t reproduce as quickly as small mammals, and so mammals became the dominant life, able to rebuild populations fast enough over 100,000 years to survive through the K-T event. Not saying a few hundred thousand dinosaurs might not have been left to die out finally during that event, just that it’s not what descimated them into extinction. It perhaps finished the job the earlier flood began.
Last edited:
Upvote
0