• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

The Law

Serving Zion

Seek First His Kingdom & Righteousness
May 7, 2016
2,337
900
Revelation 21:2
✟223,022.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
How did the animals get from "very good" to both "clean and unclean ..."
It is not as though humans were eating meat before the fall (Genesis 1:29-30, Genesis 2:9, Genesis 2:16). The fall of humankind was incredibly destructive, devastating, grievous.. we have not recovered yet (Romans 8:19-22).

Clean and unclean is to do with the conscience of a person who has developed a holiness. Think of the way we Westerners are uncomfortable to eat an animal with paws - because they are cute. Well, some animals are too cute and some are too gross (meaning it is unclean to the holy people).
 
Upvote 0

Ken Rank

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 12, 2014
7,222
5,564
Winchester, KENtucky
✟331,515.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
How did the animals get from "very good" to both "clean and unclean ..."
It was less clean and unclean and more "food or not food." A turkey vulture is not food, unclean if you will... but still "good" because it has a purpose, in it's case, cleaning up the ground of dead and decaying animals.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: SAAN
Upvote 0

Adstar

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2005
2,184
1,389
New South Wales
✟49,338.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Well they where called good at the start of creation.. When Adam and eve did not eat meat.. So the qualty of meat was not an issue.. Clean and unclean is only related to eating them.. It is not a judgement upon their goodness or badness. So the two statements are not related to the same issue..
 
Upvote 0

Aseyesee

Well-Known Member
Apr 18, 2017
2,066
1,632
65
Norfolk, Virginia
✟83,320.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It is not as though humans were eating meat before the fall (Genesis 1:29-30, Genesis 2:9, Genesis 2:16). The fall of humankind was incredibly destructive, devastating, grievous.. we have not recovered yet (Romans 8:19-22).

Clean and unclean is to do with the conscience of a person who has developed a holiness. Think of the way we Westerners are uncomfortable to eat an animal with paws - because they are cute. Well, some animals are too cute and some are too gross (meaning it is unclean to the holy people).

God to Noah ...

"Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things."
 
  • Like
Reactions: listed
Upvote 0

Aseyesee

Well-Known Member
Apr 18, 2017
2,066
1,632
65
Norfolk, Virginia
✟83,320.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Well they where called good at the start of creation.. When Adam and eve did not eat meat.. So the qualty of meat was not an issue.. Clean and unclean is only related to eating them.. It is not a judgement upon their goodness or badness. So the two statements are not related to the same issue..

God knew this when he called everything very good ...
 
Upvote 0

Aseyesee

Well-Known Member
Apr 18, 2017
2,066
1,632
65
Norfolk, Virginia
✟83,320.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It was less clean and unclean and more "food or not food." A turkey vulture is not food, unclean if you will... but still "good" because it has a purpose, in it's case, cleaning up the ground of dead and decaying animals.

To be less clean is "very good" ...
 
Upvote 0

RaymondG

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2016
8,546
3,816
USA
✟277,195.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I believe this was the result of the duality that entered the world after the introduction of the knowledge of good and evil. Before we were naked and felt no shame, afterwards nakedness was shameful......before all animals were clean, After some clean others unclean. etc....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aseyesee
Upvote 0

Ken Rank

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 12, 2014
7,222
5,564
Winchester, KENtucky
✟331,515.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
To be less clean is "very good" ...
Clean and unclean isn't a marker that determines value. Being unclean is also not a sin... it is just being unclean and there were ways to become clean. Remember the woman with the issue of blood who grabbed the hem (tzit zit... or fringes) of Messiah's clothing? She was unclean and anything she touched was unclean... including him. When Messiah touched the dead to raise them, he became unclean. I would argue that when he was born and he traveled through the birth canal and touched all the same fluids that made Mary unclean that he too, was unclean. That isn't sin, that isn't bad... it doesn't detract from "very good" it is just a condition. In the case of which animals are or are not food... that condition doesn't change. When it comes to a servant of God who becomes unclean... there were ways to make yourself clean. It isn't the issue we make it out to be in the West mainly because we are looking at this through our MODERN lens... not a 2000 year old Semitic lens which is what the NT was written through.

Be blessed.
Ken
 
Upvote 0

Aseyesee

Well-Known Member
Apr 18, 2017
2,066
1,632
65
Norfolk, Virginia
✟83,320.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I believe this was the result of the duality that entered the world after the introduction of the knowledge of good and evil. Before we were naked and felt no shame, afterwards nakedness was shameful......before all animals were clean, After some clean others unclean. etc....

One of the introductions to the concept of babylon ...
 
  • Agree
Reactions: RaymondG
Upvote 0

Ken Rank

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 12, 2014
7,222
5,564
Winchester, KENtucky
✟331,515.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I don't believe this not to be the case, but it would appear that God, in a progressive fashion does ...
Could you restate that... by saying "don't believe" and "not the case" I am not sure what you believe. Thanks. :)
 
Upvote 0

miknik5

"Let not your heart be troubled"
Jun 9, 2016
15,728
2,819
USA
✟109,054.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Clean and unclean isn't a marker that determines value. Being unclean is also not a sin... it is just being unclean and there were ways to become clean. Remember the woman with the issue of blood who grabbed the hem (tzit zit... or fringes) of Messiah's clothing? She was unclean and anything she touched was unclean... including him. When Messiah touched the dead to raise them, he became unclean. I would argue that when he was born and he traveled through the birth canal and touched all the same fluids that made Mary unclean that he too, was unclean. That isn't sin, that isn't bad... it doesn't detract from "very good" it is just a condition. In the case of which animals are or are not food... that condition doesn't change. When it comes to a servant of God who becomes unclean... there were ways to make yourself clean. It isn't the issue we make it out to be in the West mainly because we are looking at this through our MODERN lens... not a 2000 year old Semitic lens which is what the NT was written through.

Be blessed.
Ken
No HE didn't become unclean

That was thw reason why all were being healed

I suggest you read Haggai 2

All were declared unclean

Messiah was touching and being touched and all who were declared already by GOD's WORD as unclean (who believed by faith) were made clean

It did not make HIM unclean because HE was HOLY
 
Upvote 0

miknik5

"Let not your heart be troubled"
Jun 9, 2016
15,728
2,819
USA
✟109,054.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I don't believe this not to be the case, but it would appear that God, in a progressive fashion does ...
But HE declared all unclean by HIS WORD prior to the ONE who washes and makes clean had yet to come into the world
 
Upvote 0