A denial of the ridiculous is always good sense, no matter how you slice it.
Not really.
Relativity is "ridiculous".
Quantum mechanics is the most "ridiculous" of all.
But denying both means that you will not longer be able to post on this forum - since we won't be able to build computers anymore - and that your GPS will no longer be able to point you in the right direction without getting locations wrong by several miles.
To deny something purely on the basis that you think it is "ridiculous", means that you think that your human intuition has any bearing on what is actually true or not. That you think that you can decide in advance what is sensible and what isn't.
But the fact is that the universe doesn't owe you any "sensibility". The fact is that we humans have no intuitive connection with geological time scales, with traveling at near-light-speeds, with star-like masses, with the micro-scale cosmos of quantum mechanics,...
Our "intuition" is completely geared to living in a universe on a human scale... We deal with speeds that barely have any relativistic effect, we deal with masses in terms of kg's and a few tons at most, we deal with earth-like gravity not with "surface tension",...
Our "intuition" is completely useless once we leave that comfort zone.
Also, as for "ridiculousness"....
It's somehow amazing to me that religious fundamentalists somehow don't find it "ridiculous" that a person can be swallowed by a big fish and live in it for 3 days, that a woman is created from a man's rib, that physically impossible and miraculous floods occur, that the "sun stops in the sky" as a result of blowing trumpets (and that this somehow doesn't result in utter destruction of every living thing), that virgins become pregnant, that the dead get resurrected, etc etc....
But a simple and demonstrable concept like evolution, just blows your mind. Makes no sense to me at all.
If "it's ridiculous" is a proper argument against something as solid as biological evolution, then how could it not be an even better argument against the fantastical claims of religious doctrines?
Even if you try to slice it in such a way that pretends I'm supporting something terrible.
Well, honestly.... you are.
You are not just supporting religious fundamentalism here. That's, imo, not even the most terrible part. The terrible part is the anti-science sentiment. It is the idea that what you "intuitively feel is sensible" or what you
believe can override the facts of reality.
That's the terrible part. Not to say, the dangerous part.
I meant one thing and one thing only, but have fun with that if you like.
Your "one thing" has loads of implications.