You have already made it known to everyone that you believe EO is the true church and the others are corrupted. You cant tell me to go to any Church besides EO because then you tell me to join a corrupt church. That's a fallacy.
Anyway. I'm like a lot of people in this world, I have many problems. I don't socialize much. However, if not for the Lord I would have no joy and no peace, but the Lord is faithful. I'm not ashamed of that and I'm glad to share it with anyone online who would listen. I don't really care if you agree with it or not. I come here for fellowship, if that's not good enough for you then that's your problem not mine brother.
You can talk all you want about how I forsake the assembly but at least I don't come online and argue that my church is the "true" church and all others are corrupt. At least I try to do something useful, I try to show that there is hope in any situation, and God is able to sustain anyone, in any place, at any time. I prefer my testimony over yours. I don't need to argue over sacraments or denominations, I just share how generous the Lord is with this poor man.
I try to about unity not division, and faith/hope not condemnation, love not contention. That's what the Lord taught me. What he teach you? To come online and argue against anyone that's not EO?
The true Church statement is no different than the Apostles or those who followed them. If you can't tell me exactly where the argument that one Church was the True Church, then you haven't any ground. You seem to be under the illusion that the true Church argument has any relevance to the obedience of Christ's command, or the very small attempt at obedience. in this case, you are trying to defend your refusal to obey Christ's command of assembly, which is itself a creation of division and contention, with the statement that my argument that the Church was established by Christ (Matthew 16:18) to be the Pillar and Ground of the Truth (I Timothy 3:15) that is built on the foundation of the Apostles and the Prophets (Ephesians 2:20), with one unified Faith, one Baptism, and one Christ (Ephesians 4:3-6), is a reason for you to disobey Christ. That is called Ad Hominem Tu Quoque. And it's not even a good tu quoque, because while my argument can be supported from both Scripture and Tradition, yours is a direct and intentional disobedience to Christ's command. It is telling that in your defense, you never show an example in Scripture saying you can forsake the assembling of the brethren if you think they cause divisions. You only bring up excuse after excuse after excuse.
Even if my argument WAS a violation of the Scripture, it does not justify your position. If Jeffrey Dahmer, for instance, were to tell you that killing people was a violation of the ten commandments, he would not be wrong simply because he committed murder. What would make him wrong is if the Ten Commandments didn't condemn murder.
Your position is a violation of Scripture, not because of the denominations that exist, nor because of my stance on which Church is true. It is a violation of Scripture because Scripture commands the assembly of the brethren be done by ALL who claim to love Christ. If you truly loved Christ, then you would not disobey Him.
To the side of that, however, you've never even been in an Orthodox Church, according to all that you've said. You've never seen the services or fellowshiped with the people there. When it comes down to it, you won't test the spirits. You've already made your mind up, with no tests of any kind performed.