Thanks AV, an excellent video. The title is a bit misleading, but this is something that I was unaware of. I can imagine how creation science will misuse that information.
Upvote
0
-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
-
CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
My Creation Science Challenge
- Thread starter RickG
- Start date
- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,249
- 52,665
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Creation scientist go where no evolutionist will dare go. Creation scientists will tell you where life came from and what happened after it got here.
Evolution scientist don't know where it came from, how it got here, where life came from, how it started. In fact they avoid it like the plague.
An evolution scientist cannot tell you where organism A came from but wants to tell you that they know how organism B, C, D E................came to be and the rest after that. Just don't ask them about organism A...no no no no no.
IMO if you don't have organism A or the life that keeps it alive........you don't get to tell me your notions about what happened after that.
Upvote
0
You can cite some original research in the creation science literature showing original data? I would love to see it.
Upvote
0
Ophiolite
Recalcitrant Procrastinating Ape
You are being very patient. I applaud that. I find it sad that the handful of members who seem to accept ID and creation science, members some of whom almost certainly saw this thread, are simply avoiding your challenge. Frankly, it is so frustrating I almost feel compelled to seek out an example myself. First I have to find that pesky leprechaun that's been scaring the unicorns.
Upvote
0
- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,249
- 52,665
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
He's actually making my point for me.
A point I've been making here for ten years now.
Except my apple challenge thread challenges ALL you scientific methodists; not just creation scientists.
You may not realize this, but you guys demanding evidence is just as bad as those claiming they have it.
Science can take a hike.
Upvote
0
- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,249
- 52,665
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
I know there isn't any, so I know it's no use to ask for any.Ask and ye shall receive. For what doust thee want evidence for?
Upvote
0
- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,249
- 52,665
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Don't you want evidence for creation?Not any evidence for what? I can't hold my breath much longer.
There isn't any.
None was generated.
We call those things "miracles."
Upvote
0
Evidence for creation?
First...open eyes.
Second...realize how stupid it is to think all you see just appeared from nothing.
Third...draw very, very logical conclusion it must have been created, as in... creating is the only way we have EVER seen anything come into being and we have NEVER seen something from nothing.
Or does science not allow logic? IOW, I have to prove the clearly white lily is white, and seeing it counts for nothing?
First...open eyes.
Second...realize how stupid it is to think all you see just appeared from nothing.
Third...draw very, very logical conclusion it must have been created, as in... creating is the only way we have EVER seen anything come into being and we have NEVER seen something from nothing.
Or does science not allow logic? IOW, I have to prove the clearly white lily is white, and seeing it counts for nothing?
Upvote
0
The whole concept is FAITH. Until they grasp this, they will continue to be blind.
Their hearts are arrogant and stubborn. They look for concrete solid evidence of the scriptures. They won't believe unless they can use the science God created, to prove God. If anything is shown to them, they dismiss it.
I honestly don't know why they ask. If Christ Himself were to come down here and enter their house and say to them that He was who He is......they would write it off to a hallucination.
Here are some verses that tell us that until you actually have an accepting heart. One that is open to God's ways... you will not understand it, see it, comprehend it. A hardened heart looking for a provable, measurable God is not going to find it. You keep leaning on the wisdom of men when mans wisdom is so weak and incomplete.
I know, I'm using the Bible as a reference. If you cannot accept the Bible, my arguments will never mean anything because it is my foundation for all truth.
Matthew 13:13-15New International Version (NIV)
13 This is why I speak to them in parables:
“Though seeing, they do not see;
though hearing, they do not hear or understand.
14 In them is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah:
“‘You will be ever hearing but never understanding;
you will be ever seeing but never perceiving.
15 For this people’s heart has become calloused;
they hardly hear with their ears,
and they have closed their eyes.
Otherwise they might see with their eyes,
hear with their ears,
understand with their hearts
and turn, and I would heal them.’
1 Corinthians 2:14New International Version (NIV)
14 The person without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God but considers them foolishness, and cannot understand them because they are discerned only through the Spirit.
Proverbs 3:5-7New International Version (NIV)
5 Trust in the Lord with all your heart
and lean not on your own understanding;
Upvote
0
Absolutely, and that is the way it should be. If there is a devils tool, it is creation science.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+20:16&version=KJV
Upvote
0
- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,249
- 52,665
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Ya.
I know what YOU guys call them. *
We call them miracles.
* Actually you guys call it "magic."
Upvote
0
Yep, and what's funny is it seems much more magical it all poofed out of thin air than that is was created, yet creation is the Fairy Tale and evolution is "science".
Upvote
0
DogmaHunter
Code Monkey
- Jan 26, 2014
- 16,757
- 8,531
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
It's funny, because that is exactly what creationists claim. "ex nihilo".
1. false dichotomy
2. I have never seen anything "come into being". Care to give an example? Or better yet... meet the challenge of the thread: post original research.
Science doesn't allow false dichotomies and other fallacious nonsense.
You need to demonstrate the causal chain of events, instead of just asserting it.
You may start by meeting the challenge of the thread, and posting original research and data.
Upvote
0
Similar threads
