• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Where did the laws of nature come from?

Sultan Of Swing

Junior Member
Jan 4, 2015
1,801
787
✟9,476.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
It really isnt.

I dont begrudge you your belief, but neither do I envy it. I hope you can have the same courtesy for me.
Of course I respect your beliefs, but consider that if the tenets of Christianity are true, I don't think you can blame me for having sorrow over those who do not share the same beliefs I do.
 
Upvote 0

VirOptimus

A nihilist who cares.
Aug 24, 2005
6,814
4,422
54
✟258,187.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Of course I respect your beliefs, but consider that if the tenets of Christianity are true, I don't think you can blame me for having sorrow over those who do not share the same beliefs I do.

I actually do, at least a bit. For me, its a bit pompous to have sorrow for people not thinking like I do.

Just as I dont consider christianity to be true I wouldnt ask you to consider my values and beliefs to be the thruth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tyke
Upvote 0

Sultan Of Swing

Junior Member
Jan 4, 2015
1,801
787
✟9,476.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
I actually do, at least a bit. For me, its a bit pompous to have sorrow for people not thinking like I do.

Just as I dont consider christianity to be true I wouldnt ask you to consider my values and beliefs to be the thruth.
It's not pompous to be sorrowful if I believe your rejection of God will lead to Hell.
 
Upvote 0

VirOptimus

A nihilist who cares.
Aug 24, 2005
6,814
4,422
54
✟258,187.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
It's not pompous to be sorrowful if I believe your rejection of God will lead to Hell.

I find it so. I really dont want to be judged by you, just as I dont think its appropriate that I judge you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tyke
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
43,274
46,380
Los Angeles Area
✟1,036,213.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Seriously? The constants defining the permittivity of free space and permeability of free space are useless for this purpose, for they are dependent on the speed of light and aren't physical constants, they are decided, not measured.

Historically, that is false. It is true that currently this is the case, but only because it is easier to precisely measure c than it is to measure epsilon (and now that we understand that c is constant, it makes no difference to rearrange things in this way). The definition of epsilon is that it is the force constant that relates the electric Coulomb force to the magnitude of the charges and the distance between them, analogously to G in the Newton's law of gravity.

Thus epsilon can be (and originally was) measured directly without reference to c.

Maxwell's equations and these constants were developed before we fully understood the nature of light. Since Maxwell's equations are more fundamental (since they explain all of electromagnetism, not just light), I see this as a more fundamental explanation of the constancy of the speed of light in vacuum, since the properties of light depend on these electromagnetic properties of space.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VirOptimus
Upvote 0

Sultan Of Swing

Junior Member
Jan 4, 2015
1,801
787
✟9,476.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
I find it so. I really dont want to be judged by you, just as I dont think its appropriate that I judge you.
I am not personally judging you, it is simply what God has written.

For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son.
 
Upvote 0

Sultan Of Swing

Junior Member
Jan 4, 2015
1,801
787
✟9,476.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
The Bible was written by men.
All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.
 
Upvote 0

VirOptimus

A nihilist who cares.
Aug 24, 2005
6,814
4,422
54
✟258,187.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I am not personally judging you, it is simply what God has written.

For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son.

No, its you who do the judging, as its you I speak with.

Would you like it if I expressed sorrow that you are deluded into beliving what you belive? If not, then you understand my irk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tyke
Upvote 0

Sultan Of Swing

Junior Member
Jan 4, 2015
1,801
787
✟9,476.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Historically, that is false. It is true that currently this is the case, but only because it is easier to precisely measure c than it is to measure epsilon (and now that we understand that c is constant, it makes no difference to rearrange things in this way). The definition of epsilon is that it is the force constant that relates the electric Coulomb force to the magnitude of the charges and the distance between them, analogously to G in the Newton's law of gravity.

Thus epsilon can be (and originally was) measured directly without reference to c.
Historically? So you were referring to the historical definition as used in the 19th-20th century or some such? Why? SI units were introduced to avoid this confusion, ironically.

If we're going by different definitions then I could say the speed of light isn't even a proper constant, or many constants for that matter. The only thing remaining would be dimensionless physical constants like the fine-structure constant. There is nothing fundamentally constant about vacuum permittivity or vacuum permeability, it entirely depends on the system you're using.

Maxwell's equations and these constants were developed before we fully understood the nature of light. Since Maxwell's equations are more fundamental (since they explain all of electromagnetism, not just light), I see this as a more fundamental explanation of the constancy of the speed of light in vacuum, since the properties of light depend on these electromagnetic properties of space.
That's a better explanation, though as someone else already mentioned merely shifts the problem along, it doesn't resolve it.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Sultan Of Swing

Junior Member
Jan 4, 2015
1,801
787
✟9,476.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
No, its you who do the judging, as its you I speak with.

Would you like it if I expressed sorrow that you are deluded into beliving what you belive? If not, then you understand my irk.
I wouldn't mind. I have good friends who do so. We have mutual sorrow.
 
Upvote 0