What is the greatest evidence against the theory of evolution...?

[juvenissun]

I don't understand why you would say that, Juven. If "unusualness" is your standard for rejecting ideas, then why would you even begin to accept the biblical miracles, as you obviously do? They certainly are unusual.

Because we do not try to justify it as evolution. We call it creation.

 

[Loudmouth]

Because we do not try to justify it as evolution. We call it creation.

Shouldn't you call it "impossible"?

 

[Chris B]

Natural selection is the maintenance.

Yes. And the sun is the external (limited life) principal source of energy to the planet which lets living things maintain themselves at a lower entropy level than their environment.

Even "renewable energy" isn't, in the long run.

 

[Chris B]

Because we do not try to justify it as evolution. We call it creation.

Does "creation" explain why I had impacted wisdom teeth, or eyes of well less than ideal design?

 

[Hieronymus]

I agree that evolution is directional and the intelligence, in general, increased slightly with time.

Based up on what would you agree?

 

[Hieronymus]

Does "creation" explain why I had impacted wisdom teeth, or eyes of well less than ideal design?

...sigh...
The "eye argument" again....
So they told you our eyes are no good?
Well, they're wrong.
UV filter is the answer to why blood vessels are on top of the receptors.

Mutations would explain your wisdom tooth problem.

 

[Shemjaza]

The degree of the unusualness makes it impossible.

How so? Is there anything concrete and measurable you can point to in this idea of yours?

 

[Shemjaza]

...sigh...
The "eye argument" again....
So they told you our eyes are no good?
Well, they're wrong.
UV filter is the answer to why blood vessels are on top of the receptors.

Mutations would explain your wisdom tooth problem.

Then why do fish have the same eye flaws as other vertebrates?

 

[juvenissun]

Does "creation" explain why I had impacted wisdom teeth, or eyes of well less than ideal design?

Of course, both of that are part of you. If you are explained, then everything of you are also explained.

 

[juvenissun]

How so? Is there anything concrete and measurable you can point to in this idea of yours?

Of course. The obvious feature of intelligence difference.

 

[juvenissun]

Based up on what would you agree?

The fossil record.

 

[Shemjaza]

Of course. The obvious feature of intelligence difference.

You are begging the question.

The reason an intelligence difference can't evolve is because there is an intelligence difference is incoherent.

 

[Chris B]

Of course, both of that are part of you. If you are explained, then everything of you are also explained.

If I was designed or created, that is terrible design or manufacture.
I'd expect better of a deity. Especially of an allegedly omnipotent and benevolent one.

 

[Hieronymus]

The fossil record.

But fossils don't show evolution.

 

[juvenissun]

If I was designed or created, that is terrible design or manufacture.
I'd expect better of a deity. Especially of an allegedly omnipotent and benevolent one.

Why do we deserve anything better than we have?

 

[Hieronymus]

I have opened a topic to show you naturalism as preached by the church of naturalism is not science but a belief:

http://www.christianforums.com/posts/69512200/

You will see there is no need for a theist to subscribe to popular scientific consensus.

 

[juvenissun]

But fossils don't show evolution.

They show a trend.

 

[Hieronymus]

They show a trend.

The trend being extinction.

Popular science shows you a trend and they line up fossils (or fossil interpretations) for it.

 

[juvenissun]

You are begging the question.

The reason an intelligence difference can't evolve is because there is an intelligence difference is incoherent.

It is quite coherent among animals. That is: LOW.

 

[Hieronymus]

It is quite coherent among animals.

Yes, some animals look alike.
So do cars.

That is: LOW.

What is LOW?