• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Does Science Agree With the Bible?

The Barbarian

Crabby Old White Guy
Apr 3, 2003
29,947
13,411
78
✟446,605.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Where science disagrees with the Bible, science can take a hike.

Science can't disagree with the Bible, although scientists can. Science is just a way of finding out about the physical universe. Science can disagree with some people's modern revisions of the Bible, but of course, that's a different thing entirely.
 
Upvote 0

The Barbarian

Crabby Old White Guy
Apr 3, 2003
29,947
13,411
78
✟446,605.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Barbarian observes:
So far, every time we check the past, things worked just as they do now.

You NEVER checked the past,

Sorry, your postmoderney story that we can't learn about anything we didn't personally observe isn't very persuasive. Evidence from numerous sources says you're wrong.

you checked in with present state ideas and tried to hammer the past into submission.

If that were so, we wouldn't be able to make accurate predictions about what we should find as evidence. And we have done that repeatedly. Would you like to see some examples?

Black magic.

Sorry, your magic won't stand up to the evidence. If your ideology tries to keep you ignorant of the truth, isn't that something to reflect on?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,285
52,673
Guam
✟5,161,921.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Science can't disagree with the Bible, although scientists can. Science is just a way of finding out about the physical universe.
Science can't disagree with the Bible, yet it can find out about the physical universe?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,285
52,673
Guam
✟5,161,921.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Almost always when science and the bible disagree the fault does not lie in the bible itself but rather in the way in which we interpret the bible.
Okay ... we sync the Bible to science.

Then science changes one of its paradigms.

What do we do?

Sync the Bible to the new paradigm again?

And again ... and again ... and again?

Isn't that how we got abortion justified?
 
Upvote 0

The Barbarian

Crabby Old White Guy
Apr 3, 2003
29,947
13,411
78
✟446,605.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Science can't disagree with the Bible, yet it can find out about the physical universe?

Yep. Science is just a method. So no way to disagree with the Bible. And yes, it's been very successful in telling us about the physical universe.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,285
52,673
Guam
✟5,161,921.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Yep. Science is just a method. So no way to disagree with the Bible. And yes, it's been very successful in telling us about the physical universe.
Good for science.

God ordained science to enrich our lives.

But when science (or scientists) contradict the Bible, science (or scientists) can take a hike.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
It is not a "claim." Call it what you want, do with it what you want.

I call it a claim, and since you have not evidenced that claim, I can dismiss it without evidence.

I have pointed to a world of physical evidence (the world), and also to spiritual evidence. Don't blame me because you don't know what you are looking at.

You have not pointed to any physical evidence. Also, spiritual evidence appears to be indistinguishable from stuff you make up.

You definition of demonstrating evidence is inadequate. That may (for the umptheenth time) work in you little world...but...HELLO!...we are NOT talking about your little world.

We are talking about the natural world.

No, what I have is "knowledge"...that your kind of evidence will not convey, and "belief" and "faith" have nothing to do with it. HELLO! How many times do I have to tell you that?!
It isn't knowledge. It is faith based belief.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Sorry, your postmoderney story that we can't learn about anything we didn't personally observe isn't very persuasive. Evidence from numerous sources says you're wrong.
We can learn plenty we did not personally observe. Get a grip. That doesn't include overruling the Almighty on how the future or past was and will be of course.

If that were so, we wouldn't be able to make accurate predictions about what we should find as evidence. And we have done that repeatedly. Would you like to see some examples?
Sure 2 examples. We all need a laugh.


Sorry, your magic won't stand up to the evidence.
The evidence tells of His magic, but science is too dumb to get it.
 
Upvote 0

The Barbarian

Crabby Old White Guy
Apr 3, 2003
29,947
13,411
78
✟446,605.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Barbarian observes:
Sorry, your postmoderney story that we can't learn about anything we didn't personally observe isn't very persuasive. Evidence from numerous sources says you're wrong.

We can learn plenty we did not personally observe.

Then it was probably a bad idea for you to make that argument against it.

If that were so, we wouldn't be able to make accurate predictions about what we should find as evidence. And we have done that repeatedly. Would you like to see some examples?
Sure 2 examples. We all need a laugh.

1. Based on anatomical data, Huxley wrote that there must have been transitionals between dinosaurs and birds. We have since found many of them.

2. A small amount of heme found in the bones of a T-rex fossil, turned out to be most similar to that of birds, and not so similar to that of living reptiles, again confirming the prediction.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Astrophile
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
If that were so, we wouldn't be able to make accurate predictions about what we should find as evidence.
Only within limits. Otherwise you get into prophesy and dreams.

1. Based on anatomical data, Huxley wrote that there must have been transitionals between dinosaurs and birds. We have since found many of them.
Fine with me, but not because of any reason Hux imagined. Rapid evolving in the former nature allowed Eden's creatures to move on out over the earth. If a bird evolved into a little dino and later bigger...whoopee do!
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Maybe they had abortions back then like they do today?
Abortions have been with us for quite a while. They were not as safe as today, but they used to be done by a Hebrew priest, if the wife had been supposedly cheating on the husband.
 
Upvote 0

JackRT

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2015
15,722
16,445
82
small town Ontario, Canada
✟767,445.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
Indeed. It's like we had to work it out on our own.

Well, His evidence was left all over the place in the stones and the bones and the stars. I think it wise to read the evidence carefully and to regard the bible as speaking only to the spiritual aspect of our lives.
 
Upvote 0