The martyrs of chapter 6 are clothed in white robes and told to wait a little longer till the rest of the martyrs-to-be are slain. The multitude in white robes (chapter 7) "came out the great tribulation." Just because every detail is not mentioned in every passage does not mean that the Bible talking about different things.
You think the 5th seal is from Stephen on to the great tribulation. You believe the first (antichrist takes over), second (war), third (famine), and fourth (1/4 killed) seals are past (or allegorical). I believe all the seals, trumpets and bowls are future (and for the most part, literal). Like I said to Fusion77, it doesn't look like you and I are going to agree unless the mark of the beast is being enforced.
First I must thank you for answering. I was beginning to feel left out!
It seems anyone who gets to heaven in any way get white robes. That is no proof at all. I understand about "every detail" but one MUST understand John's entire book at least to some extent to understand why these cannot be the same.
One group cannot be numbered for its size. Yet God has numbered "10,000 times 10,000. One group tells us they are martyrs. If the other group was, John would have told us. Next, I don't think you understand John's chronology. he begins with the first seal as the church sent out to start spreading the gospel, goes quickly through the church age, then spends from chapter 8 to chapter 16 on the 70th week, stepping us through each step in perfect order. We know that the mark has to be after chapter 14, for God would NEVER warn about the mark after it was established. We only see those martyrs from the days of GT starting in chapter 15. It is because the days of GT concerning the mark DON'T BEGIN until after chapter 14.
Next, John does not tell us that 1/4 of the earth is killed. Read it more closely: he tells us that the Red, the Black and the Paul are LIMITED in their theater of operation to 1/4 of the earth. Study the word "them" in reference to whom power was given over 1/4 of the earth.
No, I don't think these are history, I KNOW they are history. You simply don't understand what God is doing in chapters 4 & 5. These two chapters are the context of the first seals. If you think they are future, that is only because you pull them out of their context. I can only suggest you study those two chapters until you can accurate answer the questions God asked me.
1.“At the time John saw this vision, Jesus had been back in heaven for years. There are a dozen verses showing that He went to be at the right hand of the Father. The first question then, Why did John not immediately see Jesus at the right hand of the Father in chapter 4?”
2.“John watched a search to find one worthy to break the seals, end in failure, and that is the very reason John wept much: no man was found worthy. However, if you read ahead, you find that Jesus was found worthy to break the seals.. Why then was Jesus not found in that first search?”
3.“If you notice in chapter 4, the Holy Spirit was still in the throne room. Jesus told the disciples that as soon as He ascended, He would send Him down. Why was the Holy Spirit still in the throne room in chapter 4?”
Remember, these all are VERY MUCH related to the timing of the first seals. They are the CONTEXT.
These are NOT allegorical: remember, we are 2000 years later! The first readers would have been in 95 AD. The Gentile church was in its infancy and the Jewish churches were almost gone. God knew they would not last much longer so the letters to them were about overcoming to the end. Jews were hated everywhere they went. Indeed, they still are. I too take must of this book for literal. However, I am not sure there is a white horse with a rider riding. These horses may be only to represent something else. I think their description tells us what. You cannot find ANYTHING - not even one word - to hint of anything evil in the first seal. John used with 17 other times in Revelation - each time to represent righteousness. You can be absolutely sure, God would not choose white here to represent evil.
Again, thanks for answering.