Why do you still fail to realize DNA is shared because of a COMMON DESIGNER.
Why do you still fail to realize that a common designer would not produce a nested hierarchy?
Even more, separately created ape and human kinds would not produce a phylogeny with humans nested within the ape kind. According to baraminology, the three ape species evolved from a common ancestor. Humans were supposed to have evolved from a separately created common ancestor. Over time, each human and ape lineage should only grow more dissimilar, and each ape lineage should be equidistant from the human lineage. If what you claim is true, then we should not see one ape species having more DNA in common with humans than another ape species. The fact that we do falsifies the common designer claim. You claims are proven false by the evidence.
Upvote
0