jerry kelso
Food For Thought
You are advocating a plan of salvation outside of the New Covenant Church of Jesus Christ.
All who will be saved after the Cross, will become part of the Church.
The New Covenant Church was announced by Jeremiah in the Old Testament at Jeremiah 31:31-34.
It is found spoken of by Christ in His own words.
Mat 26:28 For this is My blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.
Joh 19:30 So when Jesus had received the sour wine, He said, "It is finished!" And bowing His head, He gave up His spirit.
Luk_23:45 And the sun was darkened, and the veil of the temple was rent in the midst.
This New Covenant is "now" in effect.
Heb 8:6 But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises.
There is now no other plan of Salvation.
Paul warned that we are to preach no other plan.
Gal 1:6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
Gal 1:7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
Gal 1:8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
Gal 1:9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.
The Church is not a "parenthesis" in God's Plan, as is taught by some Dispensationalists.
The Church of Jesus Christ is the Plan.
.
baberean2,
1. Just what I thought, you believe your own view but cannot defeat the true context of the scriptures that I gave that debunked what you said about the tribulation going into the New Heaven and the New Earth. The 1000 years definition you use is wrong and is not symbolic of the church alone but has Israel at the head of the nations as well. I showed you proof of sinners in the kingdom that will be judged immediately by Christ and the rule of the rod of iron. I showed you that physical Israel and physical Judah are the two sticks that have to be united and that spiritual Israel from the church age of gentiles are not the same and have never been promised the head of the nations. The similarity they do have is that they will be born again believers because of Calvary.
2. I have proved that I believe that the nation of Israel physically will be saved by the new covenant in the future for it is plainly true that the nation of Israel is not in covenant with God. I have proved that the Abrahamic and Davidic Covenants as particular parts of land that are promised to Earthly Israel that are saved under the new covenant and the kingdom as well belong to the physical Earthly Israel and they will inherit it because it is conditioned by obedience and is eternal when they obey as a nation. Jeremiah 31:31-34 and Hebrews 8:7-13 go together. I have given plenty of plain scriptures that physical earthly Israel will come back to God and fulfill their covenants and all you can do is spiritualize scripture, thwart literal passages and not distinguishing the differences between the millennial kingdom and the new heaven and the new earth in nature.
3. I said that the new covenant was given at Calvary and you keep saying that I don't believe that. That is an untruth.
4. I said the new covenant was for the jew and gentile in one body alike called the body of Christ.
I said the new covenant was not given to the earthly physical jewish nation in Christ ministry and Christ pronounced judgement on them but it would not be forever because the church of the jew and gentile in one body will make them jealous and they will eventually come back to God and become the head of the nations. I have already proved that the church is not a parenthesis because Israel rejected Christ and the Messiah had to die for the whole world.
5. In conclusion, we agree that the new covenant was given at Calvary for jew and gentile in one body alike.
We disagree that the nation of Israel will be at the head of the nations over the earth and that they are eternal in nature and that it will not be the heavenly Jerusalem for there will be nations in the earth and kings in the earth.
6. I have proved that physical Israel will be under the new covenant in the future and that it will not violate anything about the new covenant, but is a difference in rulership position. The church will have rulership positions in the earthly kingdom and if you have a higher position or just different position of rulership than I or any other christian doesn't have nothing to do with anything except your stewardship.
Your whole perception is that the church is to replace Israel in their calling at the head of the nations because Israel had their chance and they have no other chances. This is why the perception on many that believe that are said to be into replacement theology and are anti-semetic.
6. I am sure you would say otherwise because of the church being brought into fruition with jew and gentile and I understand why you take that view but to believe that and not understand that the physical earthly Israel still has a covenant of Abraham and David that are eternal and conditioned by obedience and that it will happen because God promise and not to understand that they will have the new covenant in the future of a rulership position that is in a different role than the churches role in the kingdom is to ignore true passages and true context and reconciling all the scriptures on this subject properly according to history,prophecy and hermeneutics.
7. You have not debunked the scriptures that I have given about physical Israel that are plain and you have not debunked the scriptures that I have given about the different natures in completion of the two different kingdoms.
8. You are telling untruths of what I said and that is not koshered. This whole post you gave right now is trying to make out like I don't believe the new covenant was not given to the jew and the gentile individually which is not true and that for Israel the physical nation the covenant promises are over with because the church was the end of what Christ was trying to reach as a goal. With that being true I have more claim to say your view is infringing on Israel's earthly calling under the new covenant is stealing Israel's blessing than you do in saying that I believe that the church is in parentheses of which I don't. So your whole argument is wrong and out of line and context with the scriptures. Jerry kelso
Upvote
0