Then refute it. We'll be waiting. I think you are a result of creation. Prove me wrong.
"That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence"--Hitchen's Razor
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Then refute it. We'll be waiting. I think you are a result of creation. Prove me wrong.
Ahh...apart from the little snipe at the end you are finally starting to see the conundrum which begins with the question itself. I have stated on this thread that by definition it is impossible to prove via physical evidence the Creator of the universe (and thus establish a workable and irrefutable scientific creationism) because that would have to be from outside the creation- no physical evidence would be sufficient evidence on its own. As stated, it's asking us to clean a window and handing us a hammer and a nail with which to do it.
The question is: can you live with that? Is it possible for you to live knowing that science can't prove everything?
The opening post is asking those who don't accept evolution, don't accept an old earth/universe, and believe in a recent global flood (or a combination of those beliefs) to produce evidence to back those claims. We call this group of people "creationists". The term was already defined for this thread, even if tacitly.
I cannot agree since I'm a Creationist who posts against the False ToE and i show
WHY the Flood narrative is so important and you have been unable to refute God's Truth...nor the empirical Historic Truth of the Fertile Crescent. Amen?
All you have are claims, not evidence. This thread is asking for scientific evidence, not the constant repetition of scriptures with no evidence to back them.
I support what I post with the AGREEMENT of Scripture, Science and History.
Where is the scientific evidence to support these claims?
Where is the scriptural evidence to support yours?
Scientific theories don't need scriptural support. Also, I have never claimed to have scriptural support.
Aman does claim to have scientific evidence. That's the difference. If Aman wants to change his story and say that it is based on faith, then I am happy to accept that answer.
Well, I've had discussions like this with you in the past and have presented you with the scientific evidence only to have you come back with some statement that you don't think what I showed you was good enough.
Anything in particular you'd like to quote from that?
Seeing as how the first few paragraphs do nothing but try to attack evolution I doubt there's any real substance there
Well, like it or not, it's what is written in the Bible. Take a look at this...That's the worst reason to believe in God. "Believe in me or go to hell."
Who would worship that God?
I wonder if all the Christians that preached turn or burn will get to watch all the atheists get welcomed into Heaven while the "Christians" get sent off to hell.
The atheists will say, "I didn't believe in God because they projected their cruelty onto you." God may say to them, "You have spent your life pursuing truth and you have found it, would you like to join me?"
To the Christians He may say, "You have spent your life worshiping a being of cruelty and spreading fear. I have a place for people that are into that. Hope you enjoy."
Could maybe, but would have, most definitely not. The process of evolution is based on survival of the fittest is it not? So you're saying that a loving God would use such a cruel and wasteful way as evolution in order to achive his aims, when all along he had the power to simply make everything perfect to begin with. That's not the sort of god that I would want to worship.God could have used evolution, for which there is overwhelming evidence for this.
This idea is just a myth, designed to try to discredit the Book of Genesis. It is one story told by God.I don't even know how you can take it literally since it has two creation stories.