What is the defense for planned parenthood harvesting babay brains?

[KCfromNC]

Exactly.

You can't identify anyone who is murdering babies? OK, fair enough. Weird you spend so much time talking about this non-existent problem, though.

 

[KCfromNC]

That's it. What's the best way to respond to a call for less appeals to emotion? An appeal to emotion.

When all one has is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. Too bad that those with a broader and deeper understanding of the subject don't find that kind of random pounding about very convincing.

The real problem with this emotional approach is that it just turns off people who aren't so deeply stuck on the subject in the first place. It is one of those cases where you think that if that's the best the side has to offer, the opposing view seems to be the more reasonable one.

 

[KCfromNC]

mur·der
ˈmərdər/
noun

1. 1.
   the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another.
   "the stabbing murder of an off-Broadway producer"

Sorry, you were supposed to phrase your answer in the form of an ultrasound or other image of a fetus. I'd also accept a vague question designed to change the subject away from an uncomfortable point you can't answer. Thanks for playing, though

 

[brinny]

It's my understanding that they're still denying it...is this admission mentioned by the OP a real thing?

I've also heard in the subsequent court case...these "sting" videos have been court ordered in their unaltered form. Apparently, the video makers don't want that particular version released...they just want to show the edited version.

I've also heard that these corpse pieces have been beneficial to science.

Of course, these are just things I've heard...

Which video are you referring to? There are several, are there not?

these corpse pieces have been beneficial to science.

You mean severed baby parts? Yes, they're quite in demand, aren't they, these murdered babies body parts?

It must be difficult keeping up with the demand.

 

[AHH who-stole-my-name]

When all one has is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. Too bad that those with a broader and deeper understanding of the subject don't find that kind of random pounding about very convincing.

The real problem with this emotional approach is that it just turns off people who aren't so deeply stuck on the subject in the first place. It is one of those cases where you think that if that's the best the side has to offer, the opposing view seems to be the more reasonable one.

The major irritation with this...Your Evil, They're Evil, Your Evil, They're Evil defense is that nothing is discussed that might become something that we all could work with, but I guess that might just have some people taking responsibility for the lack of options that might just reduce the number of abortions in this country

It's really irritating to see one's religion used to strangle the rights of others, who may by contemplating their own past actions find a way to Christ. This is the whole idea behind The Prodigal Son, but I've found only a handful who can actually make the jump from scripture to real life and use that to deal effectively with life issues.

I know and appreciate fully you being an Atheist. I have several friends who are, as well and I get along famously with them because I talk with them because they are just as human as I am. We all need to respect and acknowledge each other.

This thing about those who refuse to acknowledge anything other than their own rigidity are a constant irritation to me. I'm not a highly educated man, nor am I overabundant in the intellectualism, but I think I do know how to talk to people and I think that is a plus to keeping a wide verity of individuals who are willing to lend me their knowledge.

 

[brinny]

There´s nothing wrong with emotions. It´s just that being vocal about them won´t convince anyone unless they already share your emotions. Being all emotional is preventing reasonable thought exchange. I just don´t know what to do with your emotions.

You have my sympathy.

 

[brinny]

brinny said: ↑
murder's not legal, eh?

you wanna re-think that?

mur·der
ˈmərdər/
noun

1. 1.
   the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another.
   "the stabbing murder of an off-Broadway producer"

Oh, ok. You're right. Silly me. I was thinking of the Jews in the concentration camps, for instance. It was perfectly legal to murder them.

Just as it's perfectly legal to murder unborn babies.

It's a psychopath's dream.

Brilliant.

 

[quatona]

You have my sympathy.

You never get tired of bringing up something, and then - upon getting a response - ignoring what´s been said and evading to irrelevancies, do you?

 

[brinny]

Personal bias towards and issue has never bothered me, but dishonest debating has always irritated me and the idea that you've consistently sidestepped points that other people have made and conveniently couldn't understand what people were telling you, no matter how many times they worded their text, seems to indicate that you have no intention to talk to anyone about this subject. Instead you talk at them as if the conversation was one way and we were the only beneficiaries of this ordeal.

Personal bias, eh?

Would you care to re-examine that?

 

[brinny]

You asked to whom I was responding to and I gave you the post number of the post in this thread as the answer to your questions. Jimney freaking Christmas!

And you would like me to go on a field trip and "find" said post?

 

[Ana the Ist]

Oh, ok. You're right. Silly me. I was thinking of the Jews in the concentration camps, for instance. It was perfectly legal to murder them.

Just as it's perfectly legal to murder unborn babies.

It's a psychopath's dream.

Brilliant.

Was there a law passed that legally allowed the deaths of Jews at concentration camps?

I've never heard of such thing.

 

[brinny]

KCfromNC said: ↑
Which business murders babies? We're talking about PP in this thread.

Exactly.

You can't identify anyone who is murdering babies? OK, fair enough. Weird you spend so much time talking about this non-existent problem, though.

You just did, in your 1st quote above.

And their business is growing. Their "products" are in high demand.The question is, if they have investors, they must be so proud, even if the "product", the bottom line of this business is that it requires the body parts of murdered babies.

And the numbers just keep on rising. Business is looking good.

http://www.poodwaddle.com/clocks/abortion/

 

[AHH who-stole-my-name]

And you would like me to go on a field trip and "find" said post?

I already told you that your quote did not follow to the post I made. I myself looked it down to finf the post number that it was from. If it's not worth you looking it up which would take you about 30 seconds, then I guess my responces are not that important to you.

 

[AHH who-stole-my-name]

Re

Personal bias, eh?

Would you care to re-examine that?

re-examining truth dosen't make it any more or less truthful.

 

[AHH who-stole-my-name]

You just did, in your 1st quote above.

And their business is growing. Their "products" are in high demand.The question is, if they have investors, they must be so proud, even if the "product", the bottom line of this business is that it requires the body parts of murdered babies.

And the numbers just keep on rising. Business is looking good.

http://www.poodwaddle.com/clocks/abortion/

This is so far out of reality it isn't even funny.

 

[brinny]

I already told you that your quote did not follow to the post I made. I myself looked it down to finf the post number that it was from. If it's not worth you looking it up which would take you about 30 seconds, then I guess my responces are not that important to you.

If you neglect to post it as a quote, you run the risk of not being understood, as evidenced by my response to you.

 

[brinny]

Re

re-examining truth dosen't make it any more or less truthful.

Are you SURE you wanna go there?

 

[brinny]

This is so far out of reality it isn't even funny.

Is it?

Would you care to look at the numbers again?

They've risen.

 

[AHH who-stole-my-name]

If you neglect to post it as a quote, you run the risk of not being understood, as evidenced by my response to you.

As I said in my reply, I did quote you and it didn't follow. You have noticed have you not that the software we are using on this site has been acting up, since the admins are doing something with it. That might have been the reason it didn't take. All I know is by the time I was brought aware of the problem that it was too late to modify my post, so I offered you and alternative, which you didn't understand. Now you doubled down on that by bringing up what I already has responded to.
If you don't read my previous posts why would you think I will continue posting a response to you?

There is no upside to continuing a conversation with someone who fails to see your posts, in their entirety as valuable enough to fully read. It makes it so that others reciprocate and we end up as a mutual mental flip off.

 

[AHH who-stole-my-name]

Are you SURE you wanna go there?

Look this dance we are doing just became far too nonsensical for me to be a party too. I've said what I've come to say and I am moving on. You have a nice day.