• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Retired California Bishop Takes Pope's Invitation to Speak His Mind

Fantine

Dona Quixote
Site Supporter
Jun 11, 2005
41,058
16,266
Fort Smith
✟1,380,526.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
In our area (and, I'm sure, in yours) there are ministries for ethnic and cultural immigrant groups of Catholics--I've known Brazilian, Vietnamese, and Hispanic priests who minister specifically to Catholic groups--and no one looks at the desire of these immigrant groups to have a priest whose cultural similarities give him a special understanding and empathy to them.

So why would it surprise you that women would yearn to receive sacraments such as reconciliation or sacrament of the sick from someone who would share a special empathy and understanding with them? To have a priest who could counsel them and direct them who was on the same page?

Maybe you think that women don't have a need for such empathy and understanding--after all, they seem to be naturally more spiritually aware and attuned, and obviously, according to you, God must think that way, too--because while there are priests ministering to ethnic cultures all over the U.S., there are no women priests ministering to women...

So maybe God thinks we don't need that--obviously some of you don't.

Or did it ever occur to you that priests are subject to extra temptation because when they counsel women there is often transference?

Who says Mass doesn't matter to me that much...but there are other sacraments that are more intimate and relational--reconciiation and sacrament of the sick (which often combines reconciliation). That's where women would prefer someone of the same sex to minister to them. After all, a male priest can say Mass and you're often receiving Communion from females, anyway.
 
Upvote 0

Jared R

Episcopalian
Aug 31, 2015
472
506
✟35,464.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Hi,

God The Father sent Jesus to be crucified. Does that make Him, any definition of a priest?

LOVE,
...Mary Katerina., .... .

Not quite... Jesus is both victim and priest. The Father doesn't offer the sacrifice, He receives it. The Son offers the sacrifice (Himself).
 
Upvote 0

katerinah1947

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 13, 2015
4,690
805
✟81,130.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Not quite... Jesus is both victim and priest. The Father doesn't offer the sacrifice, He receives it. The Son offers the sacrifice (Himself).

Hi,

I cannot imagine any man sending his own son into harms way, knowing that he will be hurt, is not sacrficial on the Father's part, if The Father has Free will.

In war, it is sacrificial on the human father's part, not to mention the mothers, the sisters, the brothers and all his loved ones.

He provides the sacrifice.

He also receives the sacrifice.

The question asked is the question asked though.
Is the Father in any way a priest, by sending His own Son to earth to die for us?

Sacrificing His own Son, sounds like it.

Saying He, God The Father is not Jesus, is off the point. Is God The Father a priest by the definiiton of priests offering sacrifices for the forgiveness of sins, to someone.

Just because God The Father, offered His own Son, to Himself to forgive our sins, changes nothing of the priestly nature of God The Father.

LOVE,
...Mary Kate., .... .
 
Upvote 0

Jared R

Episcopalian
Aug 31, 2015
472
506
✟35,464.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
It's an interesting thought, but I think it's best to stick to the traditional language to be precise and to avoid confusing the divine persons. The Father doesn't offer the sacrifice because the Father doesn't submit to anyone. Even the way the Gospels are written show that Jesus had complete agency in His sacrifice.
 
Upvote 0

katerinah1947

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 13, 2015
4,690
805
✟81,130.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
It's an interesting thought, but I think it's best to stick to the traditional language to be precise and to avoid confusing the divine persons. The Father doesn't offer the sacrifice because the Father doesn't submit to anyone. Even the way the Gospels are written show that Jesus had complete agency in His sacrifice.

Hi,

The Father submits,,,,,,to,,,,,,,Himself.

The Father is also the One who sent Jesus. Jesus never said that this was His idea, that I know of. Even I think it is back in Pslams, the servant of God, Jesus is talked about as being beaten.

Who if not God or God The Father to be precise, was the sacrifice offered to? Who did God or God The Father again to be precise send as a sacrifice, if not His Own Son?

Who if not God; God The Father; Who sent; who provided; the sacrifice?

As unthought of, as uncomfortable as this might be, Who provided the Sacrifice at the cross, and Who accepted that sacfice, for you and I?

LOVE,
...Mary Katie., .... .
 
Upvote 0

Davidnic

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2006
33,142
11,353
✟820,329.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
As far as Mary as priest. We can speak of her priest like role, and such in theology, but I think some of the confusion comes from something we must keep in mind.

The Church has officially said the use of that title and theology, in connection to Ordained Orders is not allowed, or to quote: "is not approved and may not be promoted" and that "the representation of Mary clothed in sacerdotal vestments was disapproved."

Mary has never been viewed as a priest in the same form as the ordained priesthood; although she was poetically imagines and depicted in vestments. It is important to remember there is more than one priesthood (Of all Baptize and Ordained) and we can look at Mary's role in the same way as we do her Hyperdulia. So sometimes she was visibly represented in a confusing manner and the Church clarified.

While it can be argued that Mary has a special priesthood in the sense of chosen from all people to have a special priest like role; that can not be compared theologically to the ordained priesthood.

The Popes have said that although Mary never was ordained she has in respect to priesthood: "as much dignity and grace as are found in the priesthood."

But the title Virgin Priest has been misunderstood and is now not to be used or promoted. And Sacradotal titles have been applied to Mary but not in a way that indicated Holy Orders. And the Popes have said we can not promote them anymore because they cause confusion and get misused. The title was used because of Mary's role in the Divine Sacrifice (divini sacrificii socia) not because of any kind of Sacramental Orders.

So we can talk about her divini sacrificii socia (Companionship to or sharing in the Divine Sacrifice) but we need to remember that has no bearing on ordination.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: benedictaoo
Upvote 0

stray bullet

God Made Me A Skeptic
Nov 16, 2002
14,875
906
✟20,457.00
Marital Status
Private
about female priests
like.... a Bishop says something.... and we are scolded and told "you guys better listen to him, come on, be open minded"

but then we have successive Popes and entire Bishop Conferences making statements against this and people just fluff it off

seems kind of selective....

JPII said the issue was done and was speaking from the chair of Peter.

Why people go on and on about it being possible is beyond me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: benedictaoo
Upvote 0

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
30,954
5,786
✟990,744.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Admin Hat...

Just a quick reminder about your the rules...

Active promotion of views contrary to the established teachings of this group
will be considered off topic.
Two choices I see:
  1. Follow the rule.
  2. Close the thread.
Those are the only two.

Mark
CF Admin
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jared R
Upvote 0

AvilaSurfer

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 14, 2015
9,764
4,813
NO
✟1,081,741.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
JPII said the issue was done and was speaking from the chair of Peter.

Why people go on and on about it being possible is beyond me.
As much as I'd like to agree with you, John Paul II was definitely NOT speaking ex-cathedra.
 
Upvote 0

benedictaoo

Legend
Dec 1, 2007
34,418
7,261
✟72,332.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
JPII said the issue was done and was speaking from the chair of Peter.

Why people go on and on about it being possible is beyond me.
That's why it's not important to me nor something I'm willing to discuss. I can not believe and I feel sorry for those who still hope a pope one day will change this. Ain't ever gonna happen. As a female, have no desire to be a priestess. Bride of Christ is a lot more appealing. But in this world of confused gender, why not try to confuse this as well.
 
Upvote 0

katerinah1947

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 13, 2015
4,690
805
✟81,130.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
As far as Mary as priest. We can speak of her priest like role, and such in theology, but I think some of the confusion comes from something we must keep in mind.

The Church has officially said the use of that title and theology, in connection to Ordained Orders is not allowed, or to quote: "is not approved and may not be promoted" and that "the representation of Mary clothed in sacerdotal vestments was disapproved."

Mary has never been viewed as a priest in the same form as the ordained priesthood; although she was poetically imagines and depicted in vestments. It is important to remember there is more than one priesthood (Of all Baptize and Ordained) and we can look at Mary's role in the same way as we do her Hyperdulia. So sometimes she was visibly represented in a confusing manner and the Church clarified.

While it can be argued that Mary has a special priesthood in the sense of chosen from all people to have a special priest like role; that can not be compared theologically to the ordained priesthood.

The Popes have said that although Mary never was ordained she has in respect to priesthood: "as much dignity and grace as are found in the priesthood."

But the title Virgin Priest has been misunderstood and is now not to be used or promoted. And Sacradotal titles have been applied to Mary but not in a way that indicated Holy Orders. And the Popes have said we can not promote them anymore because they cause confusion and get misused. The title was used because of Mary's role in the Divine Sacrifice (divini sacrificii socia) not because of any kind of Sacramental Orders.

So we can talk about her divini sacrificii socia (Companionship to or sharing in the Divine Sacrifice) but we need to remember that has no bearing on ordination.

Hi Davidnic,

I am pleased that you are in formation for the Diaconate. I would say, I respect your remarks especially from the position that you are in. It is good to know what the church teaches.

As our moderator has mentioned, I am not only pleased in your responding, the the Possible Theology of Mary, in that to me, she passes all the tests for priethood in having also offered up her son to God in sacrifice, but you also note the differences in her priesthood, brought up in conversations now, by the bishops response in speaking his mind.

That bishop, says some priests should be married, in his own opinion. There is a sound Theological basis for priests, and hermit priests, and celibate priests. so that seems like it makes sense, but from the larger picture, that you are not involved in yet, as you emphasize, is the one given you by God, that you are doing now.

I am Trinitarian, by a defiition I will give you soon. The church had me tested on that. And not I, but that information was confirmed. So, what I am to say, is from that understanding, approved of really by The Holy Spirit, as that was their pronouncements on this.

And, the results of understanding God really, does leave me with the summary of what The Bible says, that indeed God The Father offered up His Own Son, to allow us to be right enough to Him, that some of us can be called adopted sons and daughters of God.

That would make God The Father a priest, and not in the manner that Roman Catholic Priests are priests, like you have said about Mary.

On what I am allowed to do in this world, much time is spent with all religious people too, just showing them how God is in their individual religions, normally. I have no experince in Islam, and I have to work with two other groups that are at least as anti Christian, as the Pharoh in Egypt was. (That is complicated. He oppessed but God made Him oppose, so that God could show His power, thus how does God treat that Pharoh now. I don't know.) (In a similar way, opposition to Christianity, may be set, so that certain things happen within Christianity that are good somehow.) (Thus those two/three groups or more that are anti Christian, may actually also be working for God.)

Within the groups that I work in, it is to show them God, and for some it is to show them just one thing some of the time within their own religion, to make them more fully in line, with what God actually means and wants from all of us.

I am happy for the discussions that the bishop brought up. I am hoping in your formation, you are not only knowing what The Holy Roman Catholic Church says that is so, but also consider items, like only the wording used on certain things make them invalid, when in fact they are not invalid and never were invalid.

LOVE,
...Mary Katerina., .... .
 
Upvote 0

Rhamiel

Member of the Round Table
Nov 11, 2006
41,182
9,432
ohio
✟248,621.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Agreed.

Speaking from the Chair has not happened very many times in history.

was the Pope speaking authoritatively in an official capacity?
was he speaking on issues of faith or morals?
was he speaking for the entire Church? (as in, not talking about a specific event, or a particular instance)

there are strong arguments for this being an infallible statement
 
Upvote 0

katerinah1947

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 13, 2015
4,690
805
✟81,130.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
was the Pope speaking authoritatively in an official capacity?
was he speaking on issues of faith or morals?
was he speaking for the entire Church? (as in, not talking about a specific event, or a particular instance)

there are strong arguments for this being an infallible statement

Hi,
On the position of infallibility, read these words, the words are unfortunate:
In late 1614 or early 1615, one of Caccini's fellow Dominicans, Niccolò Lorini, acquired a copy of Galileo's letter to Castelli. Lorini and other Dominicans at the Convent of San Marco considered the letter of doubtful orthodoxy, in part because it may have violated the decrees of the Council of Trent:

...to check unbridled spirits, [the Holy Council] decrees that no one relying on his own judgement shall, in matters of faith and morals pertaining to the edification of Christian doctrine, distorting the Scriptures in accordance with his own conceptions, presume to interpret them contrary to that sense which the holy mother Church... has held or holds...

— Decree of the Council of Trent (1545–1563). Quoted in Langford, 1992.[23]

The Council of Trent (1545–63) sitting in the Basilica di Santa Maria Maggiore. The Roman Inquisitionsuspected Galileo of violating the decrees of the Council. Museo Diocesano Tridentino, Trento.
Lorini and his colleagues decided to bring Galileo's letter to the attention of the Inquisition. In February 1615 Lorini accordingly sent a copy to the Secretary of the Inquisition, Cardinal Paolo Emilio Sfondrati, with a covering letter critical of Galileo's supporters:[24]

All our Fathers of the devout Convent of St. Mark feel that the letter contains many statements which seem presumptuous or suspect, as when it states that the words of Holy Scripture do not mean what they say; that in discussions about natural phenomena the authority of Scripture should rank last... [the followers of Galileo] were taking it upon themselves to expound the Holy Scripture according to their private lights and in a manner different from the common interpretation of the Fathers of the Church...

— Letter from Lorini to Cardinal Sfrondato, Inquisitor in Rome, 1615. Quoted in Langford, 1992[23]

Hi,
Also consider these words:
SentenceEdit
On February 24 the Qualifiers delivered their unanimous report: the idea that the Sun is stationary is "foolish and absurd in philosophy, and formally heretical since it explicitly contradicts in many places the sense of Holy Scripture..."; while the Earth's movement "receives the same judgement in philosophy and ... in regard to theological truth it is at least erroneous in faith."[39] The original report document was made widely available in 2014.[40]

At a meeting of the cardinals of the Inquisition on the following day, Pope Paul V instructed Bellarmine to deliver this result to Galileo, and to order him to abandon the Copernican opinions; should Galileo resist the decree, stronger action would be taken. On February 26, Galileo was called to Bellarmine's residence and ordered,

to abstain completely from teaching or defending this doctrine and opinion or from discussing it... to abandon completely... the opinion that the sun stands still at the center of the world and the earth moves, and henceforth not to hold, teach, or defend it in any way whatever, either orally or in writing.

— The Inquisition's injunction against Galileo, 1616.[3]

LOVE,
...Mary Kate., .... .
 
Upvote 0
Sep 7, 2015
23
21
44
✟15,253.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Francis, like Benedict and those they follow are touched by the holy Spirit, I believe. I have a lithograph by Fritz Eichenberg depicting Christ standing among poor hobos. The revelation of God takes on human flesh. Pope Francis reveals the Gospel.

I have been greatly inspired by nuns who lead the Sunday liturgy in the absence of a priest. The reading of the Gospel, homily, prayers and distribution of holy Communion means Christ is present regardless the gender of the officiant. Female priests speaking the Word and celebrating the Sacraments would mean that we can have a pastor in every parish and ministry.
 
Upvote 0

Rhamiel

Member of the Round Table
Nov 11, 2006
41,182
9,432
ohio
✟248,621.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
the idea of "we need more priests!"

well
do you pray for priests?
do you encourage young men to discern the priesthood?
not just "oh have you thought about it" but like, really encourage? like "you would be a great priest, you should go on a retreat and think about it"

if you allow women priests
we would have a DROP in the number of priests
because no one would put their trust in the Catholic Church, no one would swear fealty to a society that changes at a drop of a hat
 
Upvote 0

Jared R

Episcopalian
Aug 31, 2015
472
506
✟35,464.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
God will raise up more priests and bless His people when His people are faithful. More and more I believe these things are totally in God's control, and human solutions are useless. Certainly women priests are no solution to the shortage problem either way.
 
Upvote 0