• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Science Says NO to Evolution Theory!

Status
Not open for further replies.

joshua 1 9

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 11, 2015
17,420
3,593
Northern Ohio
✟314,607.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I find it amazing that some people can be consistently wrong about everything. You would think that they could accidently be right about something along the way, but alas they are not.
Congrats, you just single handedly falsified the theory of evolution. You would think something good would come out of all the mistakes, errors and mutation. Yet there does not seem to be any substantial evidence to that effect.
 
Upvote 0

Paul of Eugene OR

Finally Old Enough
Site Supporter
May 3, 2014
6,373
1,858
✟278,532.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
. . . .
Mistake in my opinion for women to vote, since they have since pushed for baby killing, the destruction of family, and etc. I think they were better off as moms and homemakers.

So in your opinion it was wrong for Deborah to be a judge. Well, I disagree with you . . . again.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
So in your opinion it was wrong for Deborah to be a judge. Well, I disagree with you . . . again.
No. God arranged that. Notice she did good things, rather than kill babies and be rebellios to her natural use?
 
Upvote 0

Goonie

Not so Mystic Mog.
Site Supporter
Jun 13, 2015
10,428
10,015
48
UK
✟1,313,671.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
No. God arranged that. Notice she did good things, rather than kill babies and be rebellios to her natural use?
"Natural use"?!! There is so much much that could be said, but it would contravene site rules.:doh:
 
Upvote 0

Goonie

Not so Mystic Mog.
Site Supporter
Jun 13, 2015
10,428
10,015
48
UK
✟1,313,671.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Yet the site is fine with saying women have a natural use and that they shouldn't be allowed to vote. Weird, right?!?!
Agreed though I was more talking about expletives and really ridiculing someone. The idea of 'natural use' is decidedly mysoginistic in implication.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,072
52,396
Guam
✟5,109,454.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
"Natural use"?!!
Yes.

Natural use.

Romans 1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
Romans 1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

You don't use a hammer to drive screws, do you?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,072
52,396
Guam
✟5,109,454.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Kind of like posting apologetics and calling it science. Eh....?
Science needs to be scrutinized by apologetics; just like apologetics is scrutinized by science.

I call that: Boolean standards.
 
Upvote 0

RickG

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 1, 2011
10,092
1,430
Georgia
✟106,373.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Science needs to be scrutinized by apologetics; just like apologetics is scrutinized by science.

I call that: Boolean standards.

I agree apologetics scrutinizes science, i.e. creation science. However, I challenge you to cite a single paper published in the mainstream physical science literature that addresses apologetics. Hint, I won't be holding my breath.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,072
52,396
Guam
✟5,109,454.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I challenge you to cite a single paper published in the mainstream physical science literature that addresses apologetics.
It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than it is for a work on apologetics to be published in the mainstream physical science literature.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

whois

rational
Mar 7, 2015
2,523
119
✟3,336.00
Faith
Non-Denom
I agree apologetics scrutinizes science, i.e. creation science. However, I challenge you to cite a single paper published in the mainstream physical science literature that addresses apologetics. Hint, I won't be holding my breath.
i believe you will find a great deal of papers dealing with the concepts of god and its implications in the philosophical sciences.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,072
52,396
Guam
✟5,109,454.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
i believe you will find a great deal of papers dealing with the concepts of god and its implications in the philosophical sciences.
That's probably why Rick said 'mainstream.'

I wouldn't know though.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Yes.

Natural use.

Romans 1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
Romans 1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

You don't use a hammer to drive screws, do you?
Thanks, I was just going to look that verse up, it is the one I was thinking of.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AV1611VET
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.