Science Says NO to Evolution Theory!

[AV1611VET]

Go back to the counting threads.

???

I just now made 50 posts between my question and your answer.

ETA: There, I've done 125.

Now.

What if the Antichrist transforms one animal into a different kind?

 

[whois]

That shouldn't ever happen if evolution is true.

in order for you to scientifically state this, then you must accept that each kind of animal has a unique origin and DID NOT arise from a single source.
as a matter of fact, i believe science is slowly coming to that very conclusion.

 

[ArtB]

Let's start right there. What is the fossil evidence against evolution? How are the known fossils inconsistent with evolution?

Not today, perhaps tomorrow. I am elderly, I have pains in my brain, and there are times when my brain painly breaks down. My best wishes for your future.

 

[Armoured]

That has been shown not to be true by modern genetics. The fact that your cling to the old model in light of the evidence shows a weakness with evolution theory.

Can you provide a citation?

 

[Armoured]

see upload.

please note that this article was written by an evolutionary biologist

NYT... New York Times?

 

[whois]

NYT... New York Times?

attacking the messenger (NY times) is a logical fallacy.
i believe boyce is more than qualified to talk about this stuff.

 

[Armoured]

attacking the messenger (NY times) is a logical fallacy.
i believe boyce is more than qualified to talk about this stuff.

If I were attacking anything, then yes, it would be a logical fallacy. I was, however, just asking a question. My follow up question, is why is such a ground breaking piece of research not in Nature or Science?

 

[joshua 1 9]

Can you provide a citation?

I can not find the drawing, I can find a citation.

"Take, for instance, the increase in body size which is one of the most striking trends in popular presentations of the horse series. In fact, the increase in size betweenHyracotherium and Equus was by no means gradual, constant, or progressive. An analysis by MacFadden (1987) of 24 ancestral-descendant species pairs revealed that 19 showed body-size increases. However, the remaining 5 lineages showed size decreases. There are even lineages within the horse family tree that show size decreases followed by reversals back to increased size (MacFadden 1984; Webb and Hulbert 1986; Hulbert 1988)." http://www.truthinscience.org.uk/ti...evolution-mainmenu-65/55-horse-evolution.html

Of course the new information means they have to rework the theory. What I am pointing out is how reluctant evolutionists are to let go of the old theory esp when the visual aids are so appealing. Even when they have been shown to not be true. Even Haeckel's embryo drawings are still in use even though it was shown to be far from accurate a long time ago. It reflects peoples mistaken ideas of evolutionary theory.

 

[Jan Volkes]

And Americans wonder why their country is in trouble.

 

[justlookinla]

And Americans wonder why their country is in trouble.

Start with Darwinist evolution teachings which lend support to baby killing/selling their parts.

 

[Armoured]

I can not find the drawing, I can find a citation.

"Take, for instance, the increase in body size which is one of the most striking trends in popular presentations of the horse series. In fact, the increase in size betweenHyracotherium and Equus was by no means gradual, constant, or progressive. An analysis by MacFadden (1987) of 24 ancestral-descendant species pairs revealed that 19 showed body-size increases. However, the remaining 5 lineages showed size decreases. There are even lineages within the horse family tree that show size decreases followed by reversals back to increased size (MacFadden 1984; Webb and Hulbert 1986; Hulbert 1988)." http://www.truthinscience.org.uk/ti...evolution-mainmenu-65/55-horse-evolution.html

Of course the new information means they have to rework the theory. What I am pointing out is how reluctant evolutionists are to let go of the old theory esp when the visual aids are so appealing. Even when they have been shown to not be true. Even Haeckel's embryo drawings are still in use even though it was shown to be far from accurate a long time ago. It reflects peoples mistaken ideas of evolutionary theory.

Ugh. So that's why creationists insist on reducing the whole horse evolution to mere size increase. I get it now. TIL.

 

[Goonie]

Start with Darwinist evolution teachings which lend support to baby killing/selling their parts.

Erm.. strawman. evolution has zero to do with the manufactured planned Parenthood scandal. There is a thread on this in the news section
Planned Parenthood Falsely Accussed in Video so I won'the go into it here.

 

[whois]

If I were attacking anything, then yes, it would be a logical fallacy. I was, however, just asking a question. My follow up question, is why is such a ground breaking piece of research not in Nature or Science?

maybe it has been.
maybe it's forbidden to put evolution in a bad light like that.
nonsense you say?
do not ever think like that armoured, because i have been the direct recipient of such a sham.
and it makes me even more determined to expose this garbage for what it is.

 

[justlookinla]

Erm.. strawman. evolution has zero to do with the manufactured planned Parenthood scandal. There is a thread on this in the news section
Planned Parenthood Falsely Accussed in Video so I won'the go into it here.

Of course Darwinist evolution has an influence on the killing of babies and harvesting their parts. In Darwinism, a human has no inherent value other than as a mechanism to pass along genetic information. Killing, and partitioning, the sack of chemicals isn't destroying anything of value.

 

[Jan Volkes]

Start with Darwinist evolution teachings which lend support to baby killing/selling their parts.

If that's true how come most other countries don't have the same problems as the US? the only others who do have the same problems are religious fundamentalist countries in the middle east, which mean religion must somehow skew reality.

Why are ALL the backward countries in the world extremely religious? you don't agree? then name one that isn't.

 

[Jan Volkes]

Of course Darwinist evolution has an influence on the killing of babies and harvesting their parts. In Darwinism, a human has no inherent value other than as a mechanism to pass along genetic information. Killing, and partitioning, the sack of chemicals isn't destroying anything of value.

Do you think that just because you can imagine a god it's going to somehow stop you being just a sack of chemicals?

 

[justlookinla]

If that's true how come most other countries don't have the same problems as the US? the only others who do have the same problems are religious fundamentalist countries in the middle east, which mean religion must somehow skew reality.

Why are ALL the backward countries in the world extremely religious? you don't agree? then name one that isn't.

We're going to stick with creationism and evolution. You continually try to hijack threads for your anti-theist rants, but this is a forum concerning creationism and evolution.

Darwinist evolution has a direct influence on baby killing/selling baby parts for the reason I gave earlier.

 

[Armoured]

maybe it has been.
maybe it's forbidden to put evolution in a bad light like that.
nonsense you say?
do not ever think like that armoured, because i have been the direct recipient of such a sham.
and it makes me even more determined to expose this garbage for what it is.

Sure you have.

 

[AV1611VET]

And Americans wonder why their country is in trouble.

I already know why we're in trouble.

 

[AV1611VET]

If that's true how come most other countries don't have the same problems as the US?

Momentum.

God created this country ... not man.

Put another way:

Verbal plenary inspiration led to verbal plenary transportation; and America was born.