Could someone suggest an answer to the question that's been repeatedly ignored or evaded:
If the death of a baby guarantees its salvation, but that baby is not guaranteed to achieve salvation if it grows to be an adult, what is the argument you would use to dissuade someone who is careless of his own salvation and thinks killing babies is an altruistic act because they will benefit by being guaranteed a salvation they would not otherwise be guaranteed?
It's OK to say you don't know, or there probably isn't one, but if there is such a dissuasive argument, what is it?
If the death of a baby guarantees its salvation, but that baby is not guaranteed to achieve salvation if it grows to be an adult, what is the argument you would use to dissuade someone who is careless of his own salvation and thinks killing babies is an altruistic act because they will benefit by being guaranteed a salvation they would not otherwise be guaranteed?
It's OK to say you don't know, or there probably isn't one, but if there is such a dissuasive argument, what is it?
Upvote
0