.One of these days you are going to present some actual science, Heissonear, and astound everyone reading this thread !
Your imaginary CAGW does not exist. There is AGW. People concentrate on the CO2 emissions because they are the currently primary driver of climate. But we also affect the climate in other ways, e.g. deforestation.
Climate science is not settled. No science is ever settled !
What happens is that evidence is collected until the science about a situation is accepted as correct. The direct and indirect ignorance of climate science leads to unfounded denial of climate science from 20 February 2015 onward includes the science that AGW exists and that 97% of climate scientists agree that AGW exists.
The information you present above is what you "bought in to". You took it within as "how it is". Including the mixture of propaganda within it.
You show to be a follower, and not an independent thinker. Instead you let "the crowd" mean something to you. This apparently started at a young age.
Once you feel the comfort that you are supported by many others you "present the facts and reality".
Confidence has been built within that "you are right".
Well so do all who are in the groupies of Jehovah Witnesses, Mormans, [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse]es, Hindu, and the list goes on.
None like their foundation exposed. All are sensitive to truth that sets their error in place.
This explains why the "Climate Scam" and the radical over promotion of atmospheric CO2 GHG effects are not "recognized" by many.
Once indoctrinated what observations are made have to conform.
It's time to wake up. Yes, check your (bias) reality!
Until then follow the crowd and apply the elements of indoctrination to those who do not line up to errant science and scientists who STILL have no real world evidence to support their grand hypothesis pushed radically upon others.
Extension of past trends and periods of natural variability still EASILY explain weather and climate on earth. I've studied nature and it's variability all my life. So far what little effects CO2 at ~150 over "normal" shows little IF ANY effects, observation showing it being drowned by first order natural climate controlling factors at work for eons.
You are not going to set aside the factors that control climate's natural variability before someone like me. For you it has been a different case. I'm pointing at it.
.
Upvote
0