Maco, you didn't answer my question, which forces me to extract an answer from what you posted. That answer is 'no', you aren't going to pause long enough to consider where else you're in error after admitting you erred concerning the Law's origin.
Nothing you posted is coherent with the conversation, so I can reduce your post to a key statement.
The same inspired author who wrote "the law is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good" also described it as a death sentence, and also specified the Ten Commandments as the Law we have been delivered from, which held the recipients in the past tense - in the same chapter you extracted your sound bite from (Romans 7).
If you are to attribute one statement to God in the author's inspiration, you are forced to attribute the other statements to God as well.
You weren't one of the recipients of the Law described in this narrative, who the inspired author described as "those who know the law" in the first verse. Truth be known, you don't know very much about the Law by your own admission. That includes the Sabbath, which you replaced with your personal rendition that is far from Holy, and hasn't driven you toward God's rest as it did the recipients of the Law who placed their faith in their Redeemer.
The Law kills only that which needs to be killed and that's the old sinful man of pride and self righteousness.
Upvote
0