juvenissun
... and God saw that it was good.
- Apr 5, 2007
- 25,452
- 805
- 73
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
It is if the actual age is only 6,000 years.
There could be many actual ages.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It is if the actual age is only 6,000 years.
juvenissun, are you ever going to tell me where you taught a 501 course as you claimed?
Not your business.
No, it isn't. Fully formed bones, brains, and organs are evidence of embedded age, not history. As you have even claimed, that is needed for Adam (or the universe) to function.What things? Stars created like Adam's bones being created mature? You talk about scars on Adam while ignoring fully formed bones, brain and organs as well as reasoning and language. That is the exact same thing as scars and embedded history.
If the universe was created in 6 days, 6,000 years ago then everything we have seen about the supernova SN1987a is a lie because it could not have happened when it did.As far as the universe, you don't have enough knowledge about the creation event to be able to say that what we see wasn't created in 6 days, thousands of years ago.
Sure there is.As there is the issue of stretching out the heavens and space time dilation.
Claptrap. I am arguing that the fingerprints God left in the real world overrule the literal interpretation of a book written 3,000 years ago.You are arguing against God and the scriptures, favoring faith in your own opinion and man's opinion rather than God's own words.
Wow, you COMPLETELY missed the point.A thousand year old sun would not put out enough heat for life on earth.
Now you are saying God should have created Adam as a child and reared him?
You are now being utterly and completely ridiculous.
Juvenissun said:Not your business.
Just like you yell: God, would you ever show up before us?
Really, what have I taught my child if I tell him that I made this rock yesterday but if you test it with the brains I gave you, it will appear to be 100 million years old?Not a deceiver, but a tester, a teacher.
I think atheists would disagree with you.I am arguing that the fingerprints God left in the real world overrule the literal interpretation of a book written 3,000 years ago.
You also think that neither Special Revelation nor General Revelation can override each other but your signature line and standard run away response (science can take a hike) tells us that you actually believe something different. So you'll understand if I take what you "think" with a plateful of salt.I think atheists would disagree with you.
Excuse me?You also think that neither Special Revelation nor General Revelation can override each other but your signature line and standard run away response (science can take a hike) tells us that you actually believe something different. So you'll understand if I take what you "think" with a plateful of salt.
Oh, I'd say it is my business. You see, if you are teaching 701 geology courses and claiming to be a geologist, all while admitting you have no degree whatsoever in anything, that is fraud. You should be arrested. Please provide me with more information so that I may inform the proper authorities. I suspect you will encounter lawsuits as well.
Really, what have I taught my child if I tell him that I made this rock yesterday but if you test it with the brains I gave you, it will appear to be 100 million years old?
I create two rocks ex nihilo. I create one with two million years of embedded age and the other with none.
When you study them, your analysis shows that one rock is new and the other rock is old, despite the fact they are both the same age.
Am I being deceptive in making it look like one rock is older than the other?
No there can't. There can only be one ACTUAL age. It is impossible for there to be anything with 2 different actual ages.
Impossible? Think again.
I am not going to argue with you on that. I am not a physicist.
Something can't have two different physical ages, but something can indeed have two different ages: one existential and one physical.no, please do show us how something can have two different ages (the whole, not parts).