Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Your OP asked for comments from those who are against the "prosperity gospel".I just wanted to learn a few things. Sorry if a heated debate happened.
I didn't want a debate (this being moved to the debate forum) I just wanted answers to things I don't know about, but the internet gives false info about WoF all the time. I just wanted to hear it straight from you guys...so thank you all for your responses but I am out.
I didn't want a debate (this being moved to the debate forum) I just wanted answers to things I don't know about, but the internet gives false info about WoF all the time. I just wanted to hear it straight from you guys...so thank you all for your responses but I am out.
I just wanted to learn a few things. Sorry if a heated debate happened.
Debate happens when non-wof CLAIM to know what wof believe.I know this subject has probably been talked to death. I have a question though. I see that prosperity teaching is not just associated with Word of Faith churches. Many denominations teach it.
I want to know that you guys who are against it think about how it's affecting your churches.
Serious question, no mocking on my part. Very curious about this.
Thank you for any answers.![]()
The gospel to the poor. That's something each person who might take issue must decide what it truly means. What is the good news to a poor person?
The "acceptable year of the Lord" is understood to be the year of jubilee. This is where all debts are cancelled and everyone has their inheritance returned to them. It's a time of great rejoicing.
I hear a lot of controversy about the so-called 'prosperity gospel' (a term which those who believe that God prospers never use) but the same people never condemn usury. They would adjudge people who believe that material prosperity is part of the New Covenant as greedy but they'd think nothing of the man who gets rich without raising a finger by loading usury onto the poor.
How many people here have money in a savings account where they hope to 'earn' 5% usury? In most of Christian history, this was seen as the sin of sodomy.
The whole "prosperity gospel" thing is so vague, yet it always seems to carry the suspicion of wrongdoing, covetousness, pride, etc. Anyone who drops it should define it.I hear a lot of controversy about the so-called 'prosperity gospel' (a term which those who believe that God prospers never use) but the same people never condemn usury.
Valid points to ponder about! I understand that many Islamic banks do not give interest for the deposits!
I hear a lot of controversy about the so-called 'prosperity gospel' (a term which those who believe that God prospers never use) but the same people never condemn usury. They would adjudge people who believe that material prosperity is part of the New Covenant as greedy but they'd think nothing of the man who gets rich without raising a finger by loading usury onto the poor.
How many people here have money in a savings account where they hope to 'earn' 5% usury? In most of Christian history, this was seen as the sin of sodomy.
I hear a lot of controversy about the so-called 'prosperity gospel' (a term which those who believe that God prospers never use) but the same people never condemn usury. They would adjudge people who believe that material prosperity is part of the New Covenant as greedy but they'd think nothing of the man who gets rich without raising a finger by loading usury onto the poor.
How many people here have money in a savings account where they hope to 'earn' 5% usury? In most of Christian history, this was seen as the sin of sodomy.
This seems a rather silly argument.
Theologically, the usury laws are part of the Obsolete Covenant, and so not directly relevant to Xians.
Practically, the case of individuals lending to other individuals is very different from organizations such as banks. You are in essence arguing that banks should not even exist. They charge interest on loans, they pay (minute) interest on accounts. The alternative to interest is charging much higher flat fees for various services, right? Is that really an improvement?
This may seem over simplified yet critics of prosperity teaching always exempt themselves
Of their own financial endeavors.
We teach more than wealth is considered prosperity,we teach as John stated ,financial,physical and spiritual prosperity is God's will.
To me a man of God should be a example of God's goodness,not in lack of anything.
People are to greedy themselves to accept those who are blessed with abundance are also
Abundant givers themselves.
You will always reap what you sow,what ever it is.
Any prosperity teaching that I have read or heard states that financial prosperity is the lowest form of prosperity but if someone isn't prospering at this lowest rung, it is very difficult to live out a normal life never mind being a blessing to others.
Yet while the Christian who believes that God wants to meet our needs and those around us, is reading scripture on the matter, believing it, praying and giving to church and to the poor, he is condemned as greedy by others. A closer look at his opponents' financial affairs would likely show that he indulges in petty usury in an effort to "reap where he did not sow."