Which came first? plants or animals?

[AV1611VET]

Dear AV, Here's the chronology:

Day 3 The first human, Adam, is formed from the dust of the ground. Gen 2:7 This was about the same time as the Big Bang of our cosmos.
Day 3 The LORD puts Adam into the garden to dress it and keep it. Gen 2:8 Our Cosmos was dark for the first Stars were not made until hundreds of millions of years after the Big Bang
Day 3 The LORD makes every Tree, plant, herb for the Garden. Gen 2:9 As of this time, there was NO Galaxie, Planet, nor Star in our Cosmos. The first stars put forth their Light on the 4th Day, Gen 1:16 which was some 13.7 Billion years ago, in man's time. Gen 1:21

On our Planet Earth, plants were first and Humans did not arrive until some 10k years ago. They arrived in an Ark. There is NO such thing as Magical Chemical Generation or Abiogenesis involved. Prehistoric man, was created on our Earth, from the water, on Day 5, Gen 1:21 and changed from animal to Human intelligence when they married Noah's descendants, and passed Adam's Human intelligence to all Humans today. Gen 10:8

Abiogenesis was dreamed up in Fantasy Land, by Evols who are "willingly ignorant" of God's Truth. ll Peter 3:3-7 God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

Okay.

Thank you, Aman!

 

[Skaloop]

Thank you, sir; you are a gentleman and a scholar!

So it's not what he says, it's what he is...

Because what he said is nonsense. But since his nonsense matches up with your nonsense, he's a gentlemanly scholar. Yet you disagree with the 99.9% of other gentlemanly scholars.

 

[Strathos]

Plants and animals diverged around the time eukaryotes became multicellular, IIRC.

 

[AV1611VET]

Plants and animals diverged around the time eukaryotes became multicellular, IIRC.

Thank you sir; you are a gentleman and a scholar!

 

[Golden Yak]

Then why is my question considered "garbage," among other things?

I can't answer that. It seemed reasonable to me.

Do they know something that you don't?

Possibly.

 

[Skaloop]

Thank you sir; you are a gentleman and a scholar!

Nice try.

 

[PsychoSarah]

So what was this common ancestor? half-plant and half-animal?

Believe it or not, beings capable of both photosynthesis and consuming living (or previously living) material exist. And I am not just talking about my carnivorous plants, there are some interesting microscopic organisms capable of it. They are capable of movement, will photosynthesize when light levels are good enough, and will switch to being predators when there isn't enough light. Nature sure is amazing, isn't it?

 

[AV1611VET]

Nature sure is amazing, isn't it?

I'd say so.

And you have carnivorous plants?

 

[Skaloop]

I'd say so.

And you have carnivorous plants?

Venus flytrap - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[PsychoSarah]

I'd say so.

And you have carnivorous plants?

Sure do, I love plants and unique and unusual things, so carnivorous plants are just my style.

 

[AV1611VET]

Sure do, I love plants and unique and unusual things, so carnivorous plants are just my style.

Piranha?

 

[PsychoSarah]

Piranha?

What, am I a super villain now? No. I am not into owning stuff that would be dangerous to handle, which is why I don't have cacti anymore (repotting cacti, even with gloves, is not a fun task).

 

[PsychoSarah]

If you are interested in learning about carnivorous plants AV, I'll make a thread in the Physical an Life Sciences area.

 

[AV1611VET]

If you are interested in learning about carnivorous plants AV, I'll make a thread in the Physical an Life Sciences area.

Um, no.

But thanks, anyway.

I haven't set foot in a flower shop since I watched The Little Shop of Horrors.

 

[Aman777]

Okay.

Thank you, Aman!

Dear AV, I didn't want you to thank me but to tell me what you really think. I get the idea that you had rather avoid debate with me for some reason. Am I correct, or is that just your normal position? Your comfortable position? God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

 

[PsychoSarah]

Um, no.

But thanks, anyway.

I haven't set foot in a flower shop since I watched The Little Shop of Horrors.

Hahahaha they aren't like that. A Venus flytrap wouldn't want to eat you even if it could (the plants are tiny, the traps rarely exceed 2 inches in diameter even in the biggest varieties) and people don't have the kind of nutrient balance they like (if the fact they can't tolerate beef has anything to say, anyways). Even if you stuck your finger in a trap, and it closed, it still wouldn't be able to digest you, because the plants have a mechanism that rejects non food items or when stuff is too big for them to close all the way. In fact, no carnivorous plant is big enough to harm a person, even if they were willing to sit there with part of their bodies on or in a trap for the week or two it takes for them to digest stuff. Your fear of them amuses me. There are plenty of plants you should be wary of, but not carnivorous plants.

 

[AV1611VET]

Dear AV, I didn't want you to thank me but to tell me what you really think. I get the idea that you had rather avoid debate with me for some reason. Am I correct, or is that just your normal position? Your comfortable position? God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

Aman, second to your salvation & health, I care about only one thing: and that is the fact that you are against both evolution and the philosophy that drives modern-day science.

As long as you're saved and against evolution, you're alright in my book.

I don't care if you're pre-trib, post trib, or mid-trib, YEC, OEC; use the NIV, NASB, or the TEV -- as long as you're against evolution, I have a deep respect for you.

 

[Aman777]

Aman, second to your salvation & health, I care about only one thing: and that is the fact that you are against both evolution and the philosophy that drives modern-day science.

As long as you're saved and against evolution, you're alright in my book.

I don't care if you're pre-trib, post trib, or mid-trib, YEC, OEC; use the NIV, NASB, or the TEV -- as long as you're against evolution, I have a deep respect for you.

Dear AV, Thanks. I appreciate your honesty. My wife used to say the same thing. God bless you.

In Love,
Aman

 

[PsychoSarah]

Aman, second to your salvation & health, I care about only one thing: and that is the fact that you are against both evolution and the philosophy that drives modern-day science.

As long as you're saved and against evolution, you're alright in my book.

I don't care if you're pre-trib, post trib, or mid-trib, YEC, OEC; use the NIV, NASB, or the TEV -- as long as you're against evolution, I have a deep respect for you.

Evolution is not the root of all evil, nor does it challenge the existence of god. That you view it as such sounds like a personal issue.

 

[AV1611VET]

Evolution is not the root of all evil, nor does it challenge the existence of god. That you view it as such sounds like a personal issue.

Does it bother you that I won't hold Aman to my own personal standards?