Please, deal with the evidence. No more hot air.
Constructing primate phylogenies from ancient retrovirus sequences
How does this explain the nested hierarchy or shared ERV's? This is more hot air.
Why not? Why does this type of creation require a nested hierarchy?
Why does this require a nested hierarchy?
Would man be incapable of interacting with the animal kingdom if bats had feathers, or if seagulls had teats? Would man be incapable of interacting with the animal kingdom if trout had forward facing retinas?
Why does this require a nested hierarchy?
You can have similarities without a nested hierarchy. So why do we see a nested hierarchy?
More hot air. Will you be presenting any evidence, or just empty assertions?