That is because it has nothing to do with the standard model.
It's an integral part of the standard solar model. You handwaved at one hater website related to a specific solar theory and blew off a whole *cosmology* theory just a while ago. Now when we see that your solar model is toast, what makes your theories immune from falsification?
MHD theory, and circuit theory are *integral* parts of EU/PC theory, both in terms of solar physics and in terms of other events in spacetime.That is more of an actual MHD discussion and MHD has been and is used regularly for the surface of the Sun.
Mostly they seem to "misuse" it to describe what Alfven himself called "pseudoscience". Their models never work right either, and they are 100 percent *dependent* upon *fast* convection, so they basically all went up in smoke in 2012.Michael likes to pretend that real physicists don't use MHD theory when they use it quite regularly.
They *should* be using it to describe the movements of a *mostly plasma* galaxy. The fact they don't use the language of plasma physics to describe the movements of a mostly plasma galaxy just shows you how *pathetic* of a "theory" it really is. What they *forgot* to add in terms of actual empirical physics, they are now trying to make up for with *supernatural* constructs like "dark matter".The problem is that they don't use it for his unobserved galactic claims.
Upvote
0