• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Does this help you understand my atheism?

Gottservant

God loves your words, may men love them also
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2006
11,383
704
46
✟276,687.00
Faith
Messianic
I think I get your point.

What makes the man claiming to be the Son of God from 2000 years ago more credible than a man making the same claim today?

Is that the gist of it?

I think it runs deeper than that...

...I think the question is "why trust the flesh at all?"

To which the answer is: you should not.

There is such a thing as sin.
 
Upvote 0

variant

Happy Cat
Jun 14, 2005
23,790
6,591
✟315,332.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
I think I get your point.

What makes the man claiming to be the Son of God from 2000 years ago more credible than a man making the same claim today?

Is that the gist of it?

We actually can find a lot more information about this guy than information on 2000 year ago Jesus. The lack of information seems to be helpful for belief in a counter intuitive way.
 
Upvote 0

leftrightleftrightleft

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2009
2,644
363
Canada
✟37,986.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
EDIT: Two questions:

1. Why don't you believe in Aussie Jesus?

2. How is his claim to be the son of God different than the biblical claim that Jesus was the son of God?

I'll admit I didn't watch the whole video. I watched the first minute or so and when I heard that he lived on an isolated compound that put up the red-flags immediately.

"Isolated compound" seems incredibly fishy to me. According to the Bible, Jesus worked in public places and was always moving around from place to place.

If someone claims to do miracles on an "isolated compound" where no one can see him doing them, that is fairly suspicious.
 
Upvote 0

Gadarene

-______-
Apr 16, 2012
11,461
2,507
London
✟90,247.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Labour
I'll admit I didn't watch the whole video. I watched the first minute or so and when I heard that he lived on an isolated compound that put up the red-flags immediately.

"Isolated compound" seems incredibly fishy to me. According to the Bible, Jesus worked in public places and was always moving around from place to place.

If someone claims to do miracles on an "isolated compound" where no one can see him doing them, that is fairly suspicious.

Relatively speaking, Jesus did do miracles in isolation. Judea wasn't exactly the bustling heart of the Roman empire that it was a part of.
 
Upvote 0

poolerboy0077

Well-Known Member
Jun 9, 2013
1,172
51
✟1,625.00
Faith
Atheist
A man claiming to be Jesus encourgaes an excuse for unbelievers in Jesus to reject Jesus?

Sounds fickle. A lame excuse.
It's not a lame excuse, it's an entirely pertinent one. Consider what author Sam Harris said in a speech to an audience in Mexico about this very point:

I've forwarded to the relevant part of the video
"But the truth is, even if we had multiple, contemporaneous claims of the miracles of Jesus this would not be good enough, because miracles stories abound even in the 21 century. The devotees of the south Indian guru Sathya Sai Baba ascribe all of the miracles of Jesus to him: he reads minds, he foretells the future, he heals, he raises the dead, he was born of a virgin. Sathya Sai Baba is not a fringe figure; you might not have heard of him but they had a birthday party for him a few years ago and a million people showed up. There are vast numbers of people who think he is a living God.

"So Christianity is predicated on the claim that miracle stories exactly of the kind that today surround a person like Sathya Sai Baba become especially credible when you place them in the pre-scientific, religious context of the 1st century Roman Empire, decades after their supposed occurrence as attested to by copies of copies of copies of ancient Greek and largely discrepant manuscripts. We have Sathya Sai Baba’s miracle stories attested to by thousands upon thousands of living eye-witnesses and they don’t even merit an hour on cable television. And yet you put a few miracle stories in an ancient book and half the people on Earth think it a legitimate project to organize their lives around them. Does anyone else see a problem with that?"
 
Upvote 0

Gottservant

God loves your words, may men love them also
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2006
11,383
704
46
✟276,687.00
Faith
Messianic
No, no, no, its not about comparisons, its about words.

The words Jesus spoke were true, for all time.

You can test them, you can repeat them, you can give them to anyone.

That is the message, the miracles were more like the fart that tells you the [bless and do not curse] is there - just because you hear it, doesn't mean you go in poking around looking for more.
 
Upvote 0

PsychoSarah

Chaotic Neutral
Jan 13, 2014
20,522
2,609
✟102,963.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
No, no, no, its not about comparisons, its about words.

The words Jesus spoke were true, for all time.

You can test them, you can repeat them, you can give them to anyone.

That is the message, the miracles were more like the fart that tells you the [bless and do not curse] is there - just because you hear it, doesn't mean you go in poking around looking for more.

Turning water into wine, walking through walls, walking on water... If a modern magician can do it, it kinda proves it might not have been real magic

Given that the Jews had the best medicine of the time, and the power of the placebo effect, coupled with the human tendency to exaggerate, and the people Jesus healed are also not evidence to his divinity.

So few people witnessed the resurrection of Jesus, that the eyewitness testimony just isn't sufficient. Plus, medical conditions, and even medical practices of the time, could have caused the witnesses to have a hallucination.
 
Upvote 0

leftrightleftrightleft

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2009
2,644
363
Canada
✟37,986.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Relatively speaking, Jesus did do miracles in isolation. Judea wasn't exactly the bustling heart of the Roman empire that it was a part of.

As a side note, I don't really believe that Jesus performed miracles exactly as they were described in the Bible. Many of them are likely exaggerations and mythologizations.

But regardless, your comment has a problem of scale. When I say this guy does his miracles in isolation, I mean he doesn't perform them in public but only within his compound amongst his own followers. It doesn't really matter whether he is in a backwater of the modern world in, say, southern Patagonia or right in the middle of Manhattan, New York…if he's off in some private residence surrounded by his own followers, that's fishy.

In the same way, it wouldn't matter if Jesus was in the heart of Rome or in some backwater of the Roman empire. He is said to have performed his miracles in the middle of Jerusalem and in the temple in public with many non-believers around to see. Not in an isolated compound.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
It struck me that my not believing in the Christian Jesus is likely for the same reasons you don't believe in this Aussie Jesus.

"I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours."--Stephen F. Roberts
 
Upvote 0

super animator

Dreamer
Mar 25, 2009
6,223
1,961
✟149,615.00
Faith
Agnostic
We actually can find a lot more information about this guy than information on 2000 year ago Jesus. The lack of information seems to be helpful for belief in a counter intuitive way.
Actually is has something to do with verifying his claims easier than the one 2000 years ago.
 
Upvote 0

super animator

Dreamer
Mar 25, 2009
6,223
1,961
✟149,615.00
Faith
Agnostic
"I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours."--Stephen F. Roberts
Is it really the same reason though? That seems a bit hasty generalization thinking.
 
Upvote 0

variant

Happy Cat
Jun 14, 2005
23,790
6,591
✟315,332.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Actually is has something to do with verifying his claims easier than the one 2000 years ago.

The lack of information includes the idea that it is harder to verify 2000 year old claims.

It's the same irony either way, the more verifiable the claims the less belief.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
Is it really the same reason though? That seems a bit hasty generalization thinking.

Ask a christian why they don't believe in Zeus, and then watch their reaction. In my experience you get a look of confusion, why anyone would even consider believing in Zeus. Then comes a smirk or chuckle, as if such a belief should be taken seriously, or considered anything but barbaric or childish.

I think the number of commonalities would surprise you.
 
Upvote 0