Well no, based on my experiences with many creationists across several different forums.
Two concepts are linked which show why Genesis is not necessarily the infallible and inerrant word of God:-
1) What the Bible claims for itself, and
2) The fruit many devout believers bear while under infallible guidance.
Take a look at the verses (and argument) presented at this link:-
Inspiration of the Bible: 
Is the Bible Infallible, Inerrant, and Verbally Inspired?
The claim that these verses show inerrancy and infallibility of the Bible generally, and Genesis specifically, unravels when you consider two things:-
1) Humans wrote those words, and
2) At best the humans who wrote them claimed to have, or actually did have an intimate relationship with God and to be guided by God.
However, many forum creationists claim exactly these kinds of things:-
1) An intimate relationship with God,
2) Guidance the the Holy Spirit, the omnipotent source of pure truth and justice,
- and it is often seen, on examining the exchanges in these various forums that despite having such impeccable and unimpeachable guidance, creationists:-
1) Often make demonstrable mistakes,
2) Often write silly things, and
3) At times even lie.
If given this kind of relationship with God, forum creationists do no better, than mistakes, silly things , even lies, then why should they, and anyone else expect that writers of the Old and New Testaments did any better?
A lot of their writing may have been factual and accurate recording but a lot of it may well be mistaken, silly, and perhaps even lie.
Those writers, while supposedly having omnipotent and infallible guidance are realistically, no different to forum creationists, and look at what forum creationists achieve while under the same guidance.
Hence we have no reason to think that Genesis is the infallible and inerrant word of God. Even if God exists and guided the writing of the Bible's texts, it may well contain mistakes, and silly ideas.
Prophets in the Bible call out sinners for lying, fornicating, making false idols, bearing false witness, coveting, adultery, and keep right on going...
I am inferring that 'silliness' means 'superstitious practices' and such? If so, let's cut to the heart of the Bible, to God's Desire for His Creation, and to His Creation--just one:
When I humble myself; when I pray; when I take nothing for granted; when I go to my Creator before anyone or anything else; when I use the 'rational' part of my brain for 'good' (prudently), and have enough life experience (sinning, repenting, otherwise mucking it up and coming back to my goal),
When I read the Bible, I come to it not as I come to a history book, most of which are filled with mistakes; with lies; with 'trendy idea lines', i.e. yesterday's superstition...,
rather, I come to it looking for how did people before me try to know God; how did they defy God; what happened when they lived in defiance. What does the Old Covenant reveal; what does The New Covenant reveal?
I also look at how did people who came before me--the few who had this as their goal--succeed in knowing God; obey God; and what happened when they lived as closely to what He told them to do as possible...
I come with 'all' of me: My intellect; education--structured and unstructured; my temperament; my family background; my heritage; my mental disorder (and order), and every other kind of human quality including my limitations.
And I come to... with God's Grace.
***
And I see 'books' joined in history to serve various purposes.
I see God working through those who did evil 'for good'.
I see 'a stiff-necked people' not very different than today's people:
Living near an animal level (for our bellies, loins, reputation, self-image...), calling lust love, saying 'My God' when there is only God (Origin)... whereas there now seems to be a lot of gods people call God and then fight over 'their gods' superiority.
***
The Bible is history, geneologies, prose poems, hymns, sermons, various points of view (Sarai and Abram--read closely and you'll find three descriptions with obvious breaks and conflicts regarding how each/both responded about having a child late in life..., and the people who wrote what is now called the Bible spanned so many hundreds of years in which so many cultures mixed with, fought, merged, lived up against other cultures...
And The Bible was written by all men... with enough clout to take the time to either write the passages themselves or have scribes do it for them--and so many others added to what was there--not usually to 'lie' but to say, in effect, 'I think this is a better way to understand God in history (not history with a God and gods).
***
As for using 'reportage' as the only valid definition of 'Truth', do I read, for instance, a gorgeous work of fiction like, Faulkner's
Light in August and expect it to 'give me just the facts, laid out exactly as the events happened--no color, no various points of view, no conflict, no poetry? (How dead that would be--hardly 'art', and with the Bible, hardly inspired (really reflect on the term 'inspired') by God, the Creator of Everything!
Conversely, do I expect, because it 'falls under the category' of 'fiction' that no character in
Light in August is true-to-life, and that nothing Mr. Faulkner wrote about actually happened, and further, none of the characters are 'true to life', and therefore have nothing to teach me?
That would not hold my interest--and it certainly wouldn't hold anyone else's: we read looking precisely for where the 'character' resembles us. And if he doesn't, there had better be a 'struggle' between the part that does and does not resemble us as humans, or we will not give it a read, period.
***
I am open to being taught; I am open to the various ways we process the truth, use and need allegory (similies, metaphors, didactics, sermons) and because I do believe in God; and LOVE, and Eternity, I don't quibble over 'this person believes the Bible thus' and 'that person believes the Bible so'.
I take it to God:
My questions; my concerns; my confusion; my sins; my 'silliness'; everything...
It makes no sense for me to engage in 'debate' with fellow creatures when my Creator told me 'to love my neighbor as myself' and that was after telling me to 'Love God with all I am; all that makes up being alive'--
I am to give my entire life to God.
Start at the TOP.
God exists.
After oral history came written history.
Most history is biased.
Obeying God is simple.
Giving up sin is arduous.
Focus on ranking what needs doing in accordance of importance:
God and good come first.
After that, ask how can I follow God and do good?
Go to the source.
He'll help you know what to read; what to let alone; what you'll need and He'll supply later on.
What He won't do?
God is not responsible for the part that pits one person against another person for ego's sake.
He is not responsible for the repeated dead-end arguments that go something like,
'I am right because I believe in evolution and no God'
'No, I am right because I believe the Bible is literal and I don't see evolution in there, so it must not exist.'
'No, I believe in evolution AND in God, and I can show you--after spending months, maybe longer, on exactly how it is SO obvious--and then feel so dejected when no one much seems to care...'
***
I have an opinion about evolution, sure.
I could waste a lot of time writing about it, and 'debating it' and being ignored if I made a good point (by some), and getting Repped if I made a great shot at someone else (by a few)...
And I'd be way off the mark: Sinning.
Because Jesus told me what to do, simply stuff, hard to let go of ego-driven rhetoric, and yet, I have to...
I have to if I want
'the peace that surpasses all understanding.'
And so, on that note:
Peace to us all in Christ Jesus
(time for me to play some encouraging 'silly' games with others)
~ Carolyn
P.S. I have a torn IT-Band and am groggy from medications, so please forgive me any odd or hard-to-follow passages; I'm sure you all can live without my 'creature-wisdom'. 
