An atheists world

[toolmanjantzi]

That's what they're trained to ask for.

They probably paid good money to get where they are today, and the Bible says ...

Luke 12:34 For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.

For those who don't have a higher education, but believe what the "educated" say, I applaud their faith, but they are wrong.

That is true. What do you think about all creation being puppets? Do you think it would be obvious they need a hand? LOL

 

[toolmanjantzi]

I dont look at evolution for the origin of life, just as a way the God decided to let life change after He created it.

I firmly do not believe in the non-religious Big Bang, nor in the "spontaneous cumbustion" origin of life explanation.

So would your world have a gender?

 

[lasthero]

Given that 1050 is sufficient to say that something cannot happen:

Baloney.

Borel's Law and the Origin of Many Creationist Probability Assertions

 

[EnemyOfReason]

And if they weren't "gullible"? same thing?

If a loquacious serpent came to me and felt overly compelled to make me eat of a tree which god forbid I would not do so. I actually went through my entire life doing my utmost best to respect every rule provided.

My years as a youth were beyond miserable for this.
So if Adam and Eve were not naive and gullible then the ostracization from Eden would have never occurred.

 

[AV1611VET]

Aha! Now I know how to put 10[sup]50[/sup] into a sentence.

I tried the mathematical approach as well.

I think someone stated that math does not fit in with evolution or something along those lines.

Usually you can tell when you make a good point.

The reply will be quick and sterile, no matter how deep the theology.

And ABOVE ALL, pay close attention to their word choices.

That will give them almost as quickly as Arab phoning your words.

Or they will say that the start of life is not part of evolution theory.

Yes, that is correct.

Abiogenesis is no longer a part of the evolution equation.

Had I factored abiogenesis into the equation, then I'm sure the odds would be even higher.

 

[GenetoJean]

So would your world have a gender?

Yes my world would have gender. I cant imagine a world where nothing dies. Accidents could alway happen even if people or animals could live forever, so some mechanism should be made to keep the species going.

 

[toolmanjantzi]

?? I am referring to your comments about Yahweh being omniscient. My world would not have any such mythology involving serpents and naive children.

My world is grounded in the world we have now and no such thing as vocal serpents exist or ever have.

But your world can have that. Do you want magical snakes that talk in your world? The bible had a beast of the field that talked. You can use snakes if you prefer.

 

[AV1611VET]

Claims must be backed up by real evidence.

Not if you take them on faith.

Else everyone would be asking for DNA evidence from their parents.

If you don't want to be laughed at I would suggest that you avoid creationist sties that are well know for their lying.

Laugh away.

Jesus didn't go there, and He got laughed at.

Luke 8:53a And they laughed him to scorn,

 

[GenetoJean]

Aha! Now I know how to put 10[sup]50[/sup] into a sentence.

I tried the mathematical approach as well. I think someone stated that math does not fit in with evolution or something along those lines. Or they will say that the start of life is not part of evolution theory.

My answers arent for "they", my answers are for me. Since I believe God created everything, then my answers will explain that belief of mine.

 

[Subduction Zone]

So would you world have believers? And if so what would they believe or be called?

My world would have "accepters".

If somebody made a very good case for a claim then the people would accept it. That means that if it was later found to be in error, or more likely somewhat in error, they would not have an artificial attachment to the idea.

For example scientists accept the theory of evolution since the evidence for it is truly massive and the evidence for anything else seems to be nil.

 

[AV1611VET]

Or maybe they pointed out that no creationist has ever come up with a valid odds argument.

Do you really expect them to?

They always make a fatal flaw that makes the use of math unnecessary to debunk their claims.

Sweet!

 

[GenetoJean]

Not if you take them on faith.

Else everyone would be asking for DNA evidence from their parents.

Laugh away.

Jesus didn't go there, and He got laughed at.

Luke 8:53a And they laughed him to scorn,

I asked but they wouldnt provide it. I was desperate to prove that I was adopted.

(That whole statement above was a sin to some and a joke to others)

 

[Subduction Zone]

Not if you take them on faith.

Else everyone would be asking for DNA evidence from their parents.

Laugh away.

Jesus didn't go there, and He got laughed at.

Luke 8:53a And they laughed him to scorn,

faith is synonymous for being gullible. And using a book of myth makes for terrible arguing.

 

[EternalDragon]

What would they do?

I am just making a list of others responses.

 

[AV1611VET]

I am a puppet though and it cannot be helped. Free will is an illusion

Oh-oh.

Please don't tell me your neighbor's dog barks at night!

 

[toolmanjantzi]

Never claimed such a thing

I am trying to figure out how your world would be better?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Do you really expect them to?

If they were correct I would expect them to. Sadly for you they are not.

Sweet!

I agree!

 

[EnemyOfReason]

faith is synonymous for being gullible. And using a book of myth makes for terrible arguing.

Very true indeed bro

 

[toolmanjantzi]

Baloney.

Borel's Law and the Origin of Many Creationist Probability Assertions

So you would make your world using a theory of "Baloney". That sounds tasty.

 

[EternalDragon]

My world would have "accepters".

If somebody made a very good case for a claim then the people would accept it. That means that if it was later found to be in error, or more likely somewhat in error, they would not have an artificial attachment to the idea.

For example scientists accept the theory of evolution since the evidence for it is truly massive and the evidence for anything else seems to be nil.

Answer #2: Brainwashed humans, akin to the puppet master answer.