Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What, the part about "Arminians" helping out in their salvation, and that being "unbiblical?" Yes, I saw that. However, your answer included nothing about why you claim not to lump in Orthodox and Catholic Christians into the anachronistic "Arminian" category.
No, she provided essay's six times not a simple yes or no. On other threads she denied this and even the Trinity as Christian understand it, I would likr to know where she stands
Tell me, Rick, when did Esau THE INDIVIDUAL "serve" Jacob THE INDIVIDUAL?
Mine would be that jesus is micheal the archangel and that hell doesnt exist.
Name one that you have thought was biblical but found out it was heretical?
Transubstantiation. I used to be a Catholic. I still remember my First Communion - I was quite young. I gagged on the wine.![]()
Good thing it wasn't the literal blood of Christ! That must be sacrilegious! I actually used to be unsure about that one until I read the Bible for myself.
Good thing it wasn't the literal blood of Christ! That must be sacrilegious! I actually used to be unsure about that one until I read the Bible for myself.
Good thing it wasn't the literal blood of Christ! That must be sacrilegious! I actually used to be unsure about that one until I read the Bible for myself.
The part where Jesus said that "this is not my body and blood, but a memorial of something nice I did for my disciples when I gave them grape juice and some stale wafers"?
The part where Jesus said that "this is not my body and blood, but a memorial of something nice I did for my disciples when I gave them grape juice and some stale wafers"?
I used to wonder why the alter boy held a round plate under the wafers when the priest passed out the Eucharist. I later found out that it was just in case one of the wafers was to accidentally fall. I'm assuming it is taboo (or borderline sacrilegious) for the bread to touch to ground - even by accident.
Here is a quote from the Remptionis Sacramentum:
The Communion-plate for the Communion of the faithful should be retained, so as to avoid the danger of the sacred host or some fragment of it falling.
I think hes present, still unsure. The Lutheran view or Methodist view is more of my way of thinking about holy communion but its a mystery.
The same can be said about the cup of wine Jesus used. It was the Cup of Redemption and carried extreme symbolic significance.
Yep. I don't much care for your paraphrase, but He does say that in essence.
I don't know, it sounds like the old literalism-allegory/symbolism when it is convenient methodological switcheroo.![]()
We take care not to let the American Flag fall to the ground, and that's just a colorful piece of cloth. I don't see the big deal in going out of our way to keep communion off the floor, something given to us by Christ Himself, regardless of our view of it.
I recently had to throw away a worn out flag. It's the symbolism I respect, not the material. When it comes to communion, you attach a high value to the material.
So then you would have no problem with icon veneration, right?I was once showing someone a picture of my son. I told them, "This is my son." They understood that the picture itself wasn't my actual son, but an image that merely represented his likeness.
And I'm sure that you understand that we believe that it is the truth inside the material, and not the material itself, that makes it uncommon? We'd rather hold true to the truth rather than the material.I understand that since you don't believe that it is the body and blood of Christ you will not see it our way when it comes to handling it. However, I'm sure you understand that we believe that it is much more than common material.