• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

DO We Have Free Will?

Status
Not open for further replies.

squint

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2007
16,182
903
Mountain Regions
✟20,405.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ah???? The P in TULIP is what? Oh yeah, Perseverence...thats right!

Paul

OSAS as a position (of which there are many versions) didn't gel until quite recently.

It certainly didn't exist in early forms of determinism. The best they had was 'reasonable assurance' based on 'satisfactory performances' aka P.

True Determinism knows that it is not the call of the believer in any case, but of God Alone.

s
 
Upvote 0

elman

elman
Dec 19, 2003
28,949
451
85
Texas
✟54,197.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Does the tempter tempt believers in mind?

If you say yes, then you might be able to at least see that such minds can not categorically be stated as 'alone' within.

Understand?

?
Being tempted is not control of you. Jesus was tempted by evil, but not controlled by evil.
 
Upvote 0

squint

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2007
16,182
903
Mountain Regions
✟20,405.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Being tempted is not control of you. Jesus was tempted by evil, but not controlled by evil.

Jesus' temptation had one very large dramatic difference than the balance of us. That being without sin. Satan had nothing 'in HIM.'

None of the balance of us can make that claim.

Temptation is INTERNAL for all by an entity or entities that are not us and that fact alone categorically eliminates any mind from being just themselves as that is factually not the case.

It is also a factual case that this fact can be pointed to repeatedly and most freewillers still can't seem to understand the fact of it, showing openly their utter lack of freedom of mind in the critical skills arena.

s
 
Upvote 0

pshun2404

Newbie
Jan 26, 2012
6,027
620
✟86,400.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
sunlover1,

So that we as a group may better answer your question and engage in meaningful dialogue, could you provide us with a full definition of the term, "Freewill". Coming from various backgrounds and faith traditions, this term has a great width of possible meaning. However, this being your thread, I would like to know your particular understanding of the term.

Fair question and many may respond in various philosophical ways but the pre- 'Augustinian dualist' view held in common in every place (that is before the dualism of Augustine) we have record that shows the early apostolic churches had an understanding of free will/predestination as being two parts of one process...here are some examples...

JUSTIN MARTYR c.100-165 A.D.
"But that you may not have a pretext for saying that Christ must have been crucified, and that those who transgressed must have been among your nation, and that the matter could not have been otherwise, I said briefly by anticipation, that God, wishing men and angels to follow His will, resolved to create them free to do righteousness; possessing reason, that they may know by whom they are created, and through whom they, not existing formerly, do now exist; and with a law that they should be judged by Him, if they do anything contrary to right reason: and of ourselves we, men and angels, shall be convicted of having acted sinfully, unless we repent beforehand.

IRENAEUS of Gaul c.130-200. Against Heresies XXXVII
"This expression, 'How often would I have gathered thy children together, and thou wouldst not,' set forth the ancient law of human liberty, because God made man a free (agent) from the beginning, possessing his own soul to obey the behests of God voluntarily, and not by compulsion of God. For there is no coercion with God, but a good will (toward us) is present with Him continually. And therefore does He give good counsel to all. And in man as well as in angels, He has placed the power of choice (for angels are rational beings), so that those who had yielded obedience might justly possess what is good, given indeed by God, but preserved by themselves . . ."

"If then it were not in our power to do or not to do these things, what reason had the apostle, and much more the Lord Himself, to give counsel to do some things and to abstain from others? But because man is possessed of free-will from the beginning, and God is possessed of free-will in whose likeness man was created, advice is always given to him to keep fast the good, which thing is done by means of obedience to God."

ATHENAGORAS of Athens (2nd century). Embassy for Christians XXIV
"Just as with men who have freedom of choice as to both virtue and vice (for you would not either honor the good or punish the bad; unless vice and virtue were in their own power, and some are diligent in the matters entrusted to them, and others faithless), so is it among the angels"

THEOPHILUS of Antioch (2nd century). To Autolycus XXVII
"For God made man free, and with power over himself . . . now God vouchsafes to him as a gift through His own philanthropy and pity, when men obey Him. For as man, disobeying, drew death on himself; so, obeying the will of God, he who desires is able to procure for himself life everlasting."

TATIAN of Syria (flourished late 2nd century). Address XI
"Why are you 'fated' to grasp at things often, and often to die? Die to the world, repudiating the madness that is in it. Live to God, and by apprehending Him lay aside your old nature. We were not created to die, but we die by our own fault. Our free-will has destroyed us; we who were free have become slaves; we have been sold through sin. Nothing evil has been created by God; we ourselves have manifested wickedness; but we, who have manifested it, are able again to reject it."

BARDAISAN of Syria c.154-222. Fragments
" 'How is it that God did not so make us that we should not sin and incur condemnation?'

if man had been made so, he would not have belonged to himself but would have been the instrument of him that moved him . . . And how, in that case, would a man differ from a harp, on which another plays; or from a ship, which another guides: where the praise and the blame reside in the hand of the performer or the steersman . . . they being only instruments made for the use of him in whom is the skill? But God, in His benignity, chose not so to make man; but by freedom He exalted him above many of His creatures."

CLEMENT of Alexandria c.150-215. Stromata Bk ii ch. 4
"But we, who have heard by the Scriptures that self-determining choice and refusal have been given by the Lord to men, rest in the infallible criterion of faith, manifesting a willing spirit, since we have chosen life and believe God through His voice."

Stromata Bk iv ch. 12
"But nothing is without the will of the Lord of the universe. It remains to say that such things happen without the prevention of God; for this alone saves both the providence and the goodness of God. We must not therefore think that He actively produces afflictions (far be it that we should think this!); but we must be persuaded that He does not prevent those that cause them, but overrules for good the crimes of His enemies."

TERTULLIAN of Carthage c.155-225 Against Marcion Book II ch.5I
find, then, that man was by God constituted free, master of his own will and power; indicating the presence of God's image and likeness in him by nothing so well as by this constitution of his nature...you will find that when He sets before man good and evil, life and death, that the entire course of discipline is arranged in precepts by God's calling men from sin, and threatening and exhorting them; and by this on no other ground than that man is free, with a will either for obedience or resistance.

. . . Since therefore, both the goodness and purpose of God are discovered in the gift to man of freedom in his will . . ."

Now I am not saying the early church is an authoritative proof since even they say the Holy Scriptures are the basis on which we place our faith and doctrine. Having said that you can know that in believing that this is the conclusion...one which was passed on from the Apostles who started their churches directly to there primary Church leaders who were appointed and discipled by the Apostles (whose minds were opened to the scriptires by Christ Himself). Surely they all would not have missed this Calvinist sense of unconditional election and each in there respective place teach the same doctrine had it not been the doctrine...before Augustine (4th century) there were no Calvinists.

Let that which these holy men were taught to teach be what defines what we mean by free will (skip modern philosophical argument and manipulations as good as some may be).

In His name

Paul
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Ishraqiyun

Fanning the Divine Spark
Mar 22, 2011
4,882
169
Montsalvat
✟28,535.00
Faith
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
None of us are born with a free will but one can be obtained through grace and the application of grace via work. A divinized or "saved" person like Paul for example would have developed a true will. "Normal" sleep walking people have no will of their own and do not do or act but are rather acted through by various drives, passions, forces, and archons. Certain rare states of wakefulness that come via grace give us the opportunity to develop a self and a will though if they are taken advantage of. Connection with the divine Christ or Logos within allows for the true will and freedom of God ( "If the Son sets you free you will be free indeed" John 8:36) to manifest itself. That's how I see things at least.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Noxot
Upvote 0

squint

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2007
16,182
903
Mountain Regions
✟20,405.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
None of us are born with a free will but one can be obtained through grace and it's application via work. A divinized or "saved" person like Paul for example would have developed a true will. "Normal" sleep walking people have no will of their own and do not "do" or "act" but are rather acted through by various drives, passions, forces, and archons. Certain rare states of wakefulness that come via grace give us the opportunity to develop a self and a will though if they are taken advantage of.

Paul in effect dominated the will of Satan which factually existed with him in the same lump, and that by the Power of God by being TRUTHFUL.

He bore the FRUIT of Spiritual HONESTY and in that he walked triumphantly OVER the other power that he admittedly had.

That is as much freedom he could extract from his believing life.

Was that THEE Freedom the Gospel lays out for us?

Uh, no.

There are much greater things laid before us that are currently not on the table other than by promises.

s
 
Upvote 0

elman

elman
Dec 19, 2003
28,949
451
85
Texas
✟54,197.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
=squint;62358880]Jesus' temptation had one very large dramatic difference than the balance of us. That being without sin. Satan had nothing 'in HIM.'
Satan is not the cause of us sinning.


Temptation is INTERNAL for all by an entity or entities that are not us and that fact alone categorically eliminates any mind from being just themselves as that is factually not the case.
It is hard to understand what you are saying but if you are saying we do not have free will because we have influences, you are not talking about the same free will I am. I do not claim to be free of influences. I do claim to not be controlled completely by those influences. That is free will.

It is also a factual case that this fact can be pointed to repeatedly and most freewillers still can't seem to understand the fact of it, showing openly their utter lack of freedom of mind in the critical skills arena.

It is hard to understand what you are saying but if you are saying we do not have free will because we have influences, you are not talking about the same free will I am. I do not claim to be free of influences. I do claim to not be controlled completely by those influences. That is free will.
 
Upvote 0

elman

elman
Dec 19, 2003
28,949
451
85
Texas
✟54,197.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
None of us are born with a free will but one can be obtained through grace and the application of grace via work. A divinized or "saved" person like Paul for example would have developed a true will. "Normal" sleep walking people have no will of their own and do not do or act but are rather acted through by various drives, passions, forces, and archons. Certain rare states of wakefulness that come via grace give us the opportunity to develop a self and a will though if they are taken advantage of. Connection with the divine Christ or Logos within allows for the true will and freedom of God ( "If the Son sets you free you will be free indeed" John 8:36) to manifest itself. That's how I see things at least.

Every human being is born with the ability to love or not love. That is free will and we are all born with it. Christ sets us free from the bondage of our destiny of death if we use our free will to be unloving and wicked.
 
Upvote 0

squint

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2007
16,182
903
Mountain Regions
✟20,405.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Satan is not the cause of us sinning.

Don't know what Bible you've been reading quite frankly:

1 John 3:8
He that committeth sin is of the devil;

It is hard to understand what you are saying

Yes, it is. That is because this entity is still running interference within the minds and hearts of believers and it's a solid fact right from Jesus' Own Mouth:

Mark 4:15 And these are they by the way side, where the word is sown; but when they have heard, Satan cometh immediately, and taketh away the word that was sown in their hearts.

Believers who remain under the captivity of this working can NOT speak the fact of it, period. They can neither understand the fact nor can they speak the fact regardless of their so called 'freedom.' They are in fact utterly blinded to the fact of it and can not even have a coherent conversation because of that blindness imposed upon them.

s
 
Upvote 0

squint

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2007
16,182
903
Mountain Regions
✟20,405.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Every human being is born with the ability to love or not love. That is free will and we are all born with it. Christ sets us free from the bondage of our destiny of death if we use our free will to be unloving and wicked.

Every last unbeliever who has ever existed on the face of this planet including ourselves had this exact same condition:

2 Corinthians 4:4 In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.

If there was any doubt about 'ourselves' being the same way Paul reiterates that fact here for believers:

Ephesians 2:2 Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:

ALL of those who are still 'under that power' can NOT read the above, can NOT see the above, can NOT factor in the above to their conversations and remain BLIND to the above, all in the 'midst' of their so called 'freewill.'

s
 
Upvote 0

elman

elman
Dec 19, 2003
28,949
451
85
Texas
✟54,197.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
=squint;62359020]Don't know what Bible you've been reading quite frankly:

1 John 3:8
He that committeth sin is of the devil;

That did not say the devil caused him to commit sin.

Yes, it is. That is because this entity is still running interference within the minds and hearts of believers and it's a solid fact right from Jesus' Own Mouth:

Mark 4:15 And these are they by the way side, where the word is sown; but when they have heard, Satan cometh immediately, and taketh away the word that was sown in their hearts.

Believers who remain under the captivity of this working can NOT speak the fact of it, period. They can neither understand the fact nor can they speak the fact regardless of their so called 'freedom.' They are in fact utterly blinded to the fact of it and can not even have a coherent conversation because of that blindness imposed upon them.

s
[/QUOTE]
You are confusing believers with unbelievers--the believers are those from every nation that do the right thing.
 
Upvote 0

squint

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2007
16,182
903
Mountain Regions
✟20,405.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That did not say the devil caused him to commit sin.

Sin is of the devil. All have sin and have sinned.

Do the math.

You are confusing believers with unbelievers--the believers are those from every nation that do the right thing.

One can not even discuss the fact unless they can see the fact applies to themselves.

If they can't they remain blocked from the fact regardless of any of their claims. They simply can not say or see that another entity that is not them can TEMPT them within AND blind their minds as scriptures show us all.

Pity really.

s
 
Upvote 0
C

crimsonleaf

Guest
Don't know what Bible you've been reading quite frankly:

1 John 3:8
He that committeth sin is of the devil;
Unusually, I'm going to defend elman on this one. Satan may well have been the first tempter, but the responsibility for the sin itself lies with man. Adam was not controlled by the Satan and neither are we. Saying we are of the devil is the same as saying we are Satan's children - not literally true but a metaphor for our condition.
 
Upvote 0
C

crimsonleaf

Guest
Apologies, I was at cross purposes and got lost.

Regarding Adam and only fools reaching that conclusion. I believe they call them selves Double Predestinarians.
Thanks - it happens.

I'm not aware that double predestinarians believe that God caused Adam to sin. Double predestinarians are called so because they believe that God actively chooses some for damnation and some for salvation. Single predestinarians believe that God chooses some for salvation and allows the others to follow their own chosen path to damnation. In other words allows sinners to stay in their "default" position.

I'm a single predestinarian before you ask, as are the majority of modern Calvinists.
 
Upvote 0

squint

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2007
16,182
903
Mountain Regions
✟20,405.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Unusually, I'm going to defend elman on this one.

But you will regardless?
Satan may well have been the first tempter, but the responsibility for the sin itself lies with man.
The factual observation being put in view on this matter is that it is not 'just man' between man's ears.

If any acknowledge the fact of temptation by an entity that is not man, freewill is technically off the table because there are in fact two separate entities operational therein. One of them is not going to do any different thaan what he does, and that is to tempt within regardless of the will of the man.

Adam was not controlled by the Satan and neither are we.
It has nothing to do with control. If you insist on seeing internal temptation as something out of Hollywood with vomit spewing and head spinning we're not going to get far.

Saying we are of the devil is the same as saying we are Satan's children - not literally true but a metaphor for our condition.
Again, quite beside the point of fact. Your logic has merely lept to an unrequired place that is not sustainable.

Jesus advised us of certain principles of fact in this matter as noted in some of my prior posts herein.

If you are interested in see those facts go pick them up and maybe we can have a factual discussion rather than one imposed by Hollywood and leaps of logic that don't connect.

s
 
Upvote 0

JackSparrow

Well-Known Member
Dec 12, 2012
653
4
North London UK
✟825.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
.... Single predestinarians believe that God chooses some for salvation and allows the others to follow their own chosen path to damnation. In other words allows sinners to stay in their "default" position.
....


I think I am right in saying Double predestinarians hold that even the sin is predestined. I.e most are supralapsarian. Please correct if I am wrong as it is not my interest to misrepresent.

Single predestinarians tend to fall in the moderate camp. How did sinners get in a default position ? Who invented the default position. If man is able but not willing and cannot be willing by his own efforts then how is this any better than the double predestinarians.

Man unfortunately inherits sin or gets it imputed by God. God has NOT allowed any means for the non elect to even want to be saved. So really there is no difference between single and double predestination. In fact it appears SP is much crueler. DP - Gods created them as reprobates. SP - God denied there will the ability to will.
 
Upvote 0
C

crimsonleaf

Guest
But you will regardless?
The factual observation being put in view on this matter is that it is not 'just man' between man's ears.

If any acknowledge the fact of temptation by an entity that is not man, freewill is technically off the table because there are in fact two separate entities operational therein. One of them is not going to do any different thaan what he does, and that is to tempt within regardless of the will of the man.

It has nothing to do with control. If you insist on seeing internal temptation as something out of Hollywood with vomit spewing and head spinning we're not going to get far.

Again, quite beside the point of fact. Your logic has merely lept to an unrequired place that is not sustainable.

Jesus advised us of certain principles of fact in this matter as noted in some of my prior posts herein.

If you are interested in see those facts go pick them up and maybe we can have a factual discussion rather than one imposed by Hollywood and leaps of logic that don't connect.

s

I think you're confusing me with some imaginary friend you may have. I do not believe I've anywhere tried to create an impression of head-spinning, green vomiting, demon possessed individuals, so quit with the flamboyant strawman.

Your factual observation is not necessarily that - factual. The choice to sin is man's and man's alone. He may be tempted by another man woman child or demon, it doesn't matter. The submission to temptation is the responsibility of he who submits.
 
Upvote 0

squint

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2007
16,182
903
Mountain Regions
✟20,405.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I think you're confusing me with some imaginary friend you may have. I do not believe I've anywhere tried to create an impression of head-spinning, green vomiting, demon possessed individuals, so quit with the flamboyant strawman.

You made a futile attempt to equate internal temptation to possession, which is of course totally absurd.

Your factual observation is not necessarily that - factual.

I might suggest that temptation by an entity that is not man is quite a secure New Testament fact.

Let's ignore it or spin it some other way shall we?

The choice to sin is man's and man's alone.

Man doesn't make choices for other entities. Where do you get the idea that we control intentions of Satan or devils? They do what they do regardless of what you think OR your again likewise futile attempts to BLAME the believer only.

zzzzzzz

s
 
Upvote 0

elman

elman
Dec 19, 2003
28,949
451
85
Texas
✟54,197.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Sin is of the devil. All have sin and have sinned.

Do the math.
The devil does not destroy your soul. Read Ezekiel 18. What destroys your soul?


One can not even discuss the fact unless they can see the fact applies to themselves.

If they can't they remain blocked from the fact regardless of any of their claims. They simply can not say or see that another entity that is not them can TEMPT them within AND blind their minds as scriptures show us all.

Pity really.

s
Believing other people are blind can prevent one understanding their own blindness.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.