• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Assumption of Mary and dogmatic statement

B

bbbbbbb

Guest
Actually the cult of relics is a very early tradition, that stretched as early as the 1st century as shown by archelogical evidence. In fact one of the things that the Roman's would do with the bodies of martyrs was throw them into the sea with weights on so that the living Christians could not get access to the saint's relics.

This is actually one of the most convincing evidences of the Assumption of the Blessed Mother. There are only two people in Christendom that there are no bodily relics even claimed and that is Jesus and Mary. We have relics of all of the Apostles, St. John the Baptist, the early martyrs, etc. None of the Blessed Mother or her only son.

Note, please, that I did not assign any beginning date to the cult of relics, but merely stated that it reached its zenith in the late middle ages.
 
Upvote 0

Kristos

Servant
Aug 30, 2006
7,379
1,068
Minnesota
✟45,052.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Note, please, that I did not assign any beginning date to the cult of relics, but merely stated that it reached its zenith in the late middle ages.

- in response to the lack of bodily relics of Mary - you stated that the cult of relics started "much later" - not in the 1st Century. To which they responded - no, it started in the 1st Century based on x.
 
Upvote 0

Erose

Newbie
Jul 2, 2010
9,009
1,471
✟75,992.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Note, please, that I did not assign any beginning date to the cult of relics, but merely stated that it reached its zenith in the late middle ages.
And I say that this is wrong. It's zenith was well before that and relics were very popular from the outset of the Church as shown from the Basilicas and Churches built over the relics of many early martyrs and saints after Christianity became legal in the Empire.
 
Upvote 0
B

bbbbbbb

Guest
And I say that this is wrong. It's zenith was well before that and relics were very popular from the outset of the Church as shown from the Basilicas and Churches built over the relics of many early martyrs and saints after Christianity became legal in the Empire.

Do you have any idea as to why relics were so extremely popular when the Second Commandment forbids them?
 
Upvote 0