• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Italian Scientists Convicted Of Manslaughter--Over Earthquake They Failed To Predict

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟288,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

Split Rock

Conflation of Blathers
Nov 3, 2003
17,607
730
North Dakota
✟22,466.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single

Keep in mind this is the same judicial system that convicted Amanda Knox of murder and then freed her later. The wheels of justice may turn slowly in Italy, but it doesn't mean that it doesn't come up with the correct verdict in the end. We will have to see...

Here is another link: http://www.latimes.com/news/science...nslaughter-20121022,0,1288680.story?track=rss
 
Upvote 0

pgp_protector

Noted strange person
Dec 17, 2003
51,902
17,803
57
Earth For Now
Visit site
✟465,321.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
:doh:

Next up we will be prosecuting meteorologists for failing to predict a rainstorm.
too late
Belgian Town May Sue Over Soggy Weather Forecasts : NPR
Leo Lippens wants to sue the private weather service Meteo Belgique for issuing a pessimistic full-summer forecast that he says wasn't "fair" because it didn't emphasize that the Belgian coast generally has clearer weather than the rest of the country.


Can You Sue The Weatherman? Belgian Tourism Officials Hope So
 
Upvote 0

Michael

Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
25,145
1,721
Mt. Shasta, California
Visit site
✟320,648.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Upvote 0

Blayz

Well-Known Member
Aug 1, 2007
3,367
231
60
Singapore
✟4,827.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
That sort of nonsense just opens up all sorts of frivolous lawsuits. I can just envision the insurance companies suing astronomers for not "predicting" this sort of thing:

Meteorite hit suburban Calif. house - CBS News

But you are OK with them being sued for false advertising...even though they are not selling anything.

Where do you draw the line?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tiberius
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,319
52,684
Guam
✟5,166,640.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Oh great, looks like AV has one more to add to his list:

Challenger, Pluto, Thalidomide, the moon, and now failure to predict large earthquakes.
Here you go, newbie:
Be Prepared.

That's why seismologists were probably picking their noses in Hawaii when Mexico got blindsided; or picking their noses in Monte Carlo when Haiti got blindsided.

As I have pointed out before -- pick any major disaster in history and tell me where the scientists were at the time; probably on the other side of the earth playing Euchre or getting their name in lights warning of a local disaster or something.

Then they rush to the scene and pose for pictures in the National Geographic or Time or something.

One thing that bugs me is when some tragedy strikes, and CNN has a scientist's head on TV, sitting in a chair fit for a CEO, telling us exactly what happened.
 
Upvote 0

Split Rock

Conflation of Blathers
Nov 3, 2003
17,607
730
North Dakota
✟22,466.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Here you go, newbie:

Be Prepared.

That's why seismologists were probably picking their noses in Hawaii when Mexico got blindsided; or picking their noses in Monte Carlo when Haiti got blindsided.

As I have pointed out before -- pick any major disaster in history and tell me where the scientists were at the time; probably on the other side of the earth playing Euchre or getting their name in lights warning of a local disaster or something.

Then they rush to the scene and pose for pictures in the National Geographic or Time or something.

One thing that bugs me is when some tragedy strikes, and CNN has a scientist's head on TV, sitting in a chair fit for a CEO, telling us exactly what happened.

But God blesses us with these people, don't forget.....
 
Upvote 0

Michael

Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
25,145
1,721
Mt. Shasta, California
Visit site
✟320,648.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
But you are OK with them being sued for false advertising...even though they are not selling anything.

Where do you draw the line?

I tend to draw the line at "knowledge claims". In the case of the volcano, you're essentially asking scientists to "predict the future" in terms of when it might erupt, and then attempting to punish them for not correctly predicting the future. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that the ground was rumbling and it was "dangerous" to be in the area. Asking them "when's it' going to blow" is technically beyond the limits of our scientific knowledge as the case in point so aptly demonstrates.

In the case of astronomers however, they're making a "knowledge claim". They claim to have created a "dark energy camera", when in fact nothing like that does exist or could exist.

Completely different issues. In the first case they simply don't have a crystal ball. In the second case of astronomy, they profess to have one.
 
Upvote 0

Blayz

Well-Known Member
Aug 1, 2007
3,367
231
60
Singapore
✟4,827.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
In the case of astronomers however, they're making a "knowledge claim". They claim to have created a "dark energy camera", when in fact nothing like that does exist or could exist.

How does this constitute false advertising, and what is your grounds for suing them, and in which court would you the action?

Ordinarily when a scientist makes a false claim, it gets shown to be false in the literature and the claim is then retracted.

This whole "advertising", "suing" thing, it's so...unscientific. Is it because you get all your science from uncorroborated websites and science press?
 
Upvote 0

Cute Tink

Blah
Site Supporter
Nov 22, 2002
19,570
4,622
✟147,891.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Upvote 0

pgp_protector

Noted strange person
Dec 17, 2003
51,902
17,803
57
Earth For Now
Visit site
✟465,321.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
Doh! :doh:

I guess that will be the last time I assume that stupidity has boundaries...

Reminds me of this
hu079thumb%20-%20Only%20Two%20Things%20Are%20Infinite.jpg
 
Upvote 0