• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

The best evidence for Creationism

Status
Not open for further replies.

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,269
52,669
Guam
✟5,159,647.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
What would that have altered?
Probably nothing; but it certainly would be an exception to this doosey of a comment:
He considers religion to be a failing of education, something people grow out of as they learn - thus, the amount of religious people in the US is, to him, indicative of a poor educational system.
 
Upvote 0

Mr Strawberry

Newbie
Jan 20, 2012
4,180
81
Great Britain
✟27,542.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Probably nothing; but it certainly would be an exception to this doosey of a comment:

I don't follow. Reading through the wiki page Heaven's Gate looks like a mishmash of extremist religion added to a load of new age nonsense. Both extremist religion and new age stuff are most popular among the same educational sector. I'm completely missing the point you are making.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,269
52,669
Guam
✟5,159,647.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I don't follow. Reading through the wiki page Heaven's Gate looks like a mishmash of extremist religion added to a load of new age nonsense. Both extremist religion and new age stuff appeal to the same educational sector. I'm completely missing the point you are making.
Those 39 people who died were mainly webmasters ... highly-sought webmasters.

Their website (highersource), was a state-of-the-art piece of work.

In short, those people had the smarts of mensa and the creativity of mad scientists.

They are indicative of people who can have a high IQ and be religious at the same time.

Of course, [the late] Mr. Henry Morris and others are swept under the carpet by Internet scientists; but Heaven's Gate is hard to sweep away.

Joke of the Day:
You would too, if you had to work with Windows 95!
 
Upvote 0

Mr Strawberry

Newbie
Jan 20, 2012
4,180
81
Great Britain
✟27,542.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Those 39 people who died were mainly webmasters ... highly-sought webmasters.

Their website (highersource), was a state-of-the-art piece of work.

In short, those people had the smarts of mensa and the creativity of mad scientists.

They are indicative of people who can have a high IQ and be religious at the same time.

Of course, [the late] Mr. Henry Morris and others are swept under the carpet by Internet scientists; but Heaven's Gate is hard to sweep away.

Joke of the Day:
You would too, if you had to work with Windows 95!


Webmasters?

You are confusing geekiness with level of education. One can have an IQ of 200 and it means absolutely nothing if your level of education is poor.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,269
52,669
Guam
✟5,159,647.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Webmasters?

You are confusing geekiness with level of education. One can have an IQ of 200 and it means absolutely nothing if your level of education is poor.
Why then do we have posts like:
You really need to get a education so you can be smarter then them who doesnt have any?

(I made that up.)
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,269
52,669
Guam
✟5,159,647.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I have no idea what point you are trying to make.
Let's simplify this:

Religion and education have no symbiotic relationship.

You can be religious and educated.
You can be religious and uneducated.
You can be non-religious and educated.
You can be non-religious and uneducated.
 
Upvote 0

Elias526

Newbie
Jun 16, 2012
125
0
✟22,747.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
He considers religion to be a failing of education, something people grow out of as they learn
Science does not back him up. They can show that religion develops parts of the brain that clearly he never developed. Areas he would show a flat line on a brain scan. Simply making him less functional then religious people.
 
Upvote 0

Mr Strawberry

Newbie
Jan 20, 2012
4,180
81
Great Britain
✟27,542.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Let's simplify this:

Religion and education have no symbiotic relationship.

You can be religious and educated.
You can be religious and uneducated.
You can be non-religious and educated.
You can be non-religious and uneducated.

Of course you can.

But the statistics continually show that creationism is most popular among those with poor levels of education.
 
Upvote 0

Mr Strawberry

Newbie
Jan 20, 2012
4,180
81
Great Britain
✟27,542.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Science does not back him up. They can show that religion develops parts of the brain that clearly he never developed. Areas he would show a flat line on a brain scan. Simply making him less functional then religious people.

There is a religious cortex?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,269
52,669
Guam
✟5,159,647.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
But the statistics continually show that creationism is most popular among those with poor levels of education.
Only if you ignore the past.
pixel.gif

"There's a hole in our knowledge, we leap frog from the Renaissance to the Greeks," professor Salim al-Hassani, Chairman of the Foundation for Science, Technology and Civilisation, and editor of the book told CNN.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,269
52,669
Guam
✟5,159,647.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Or alternatively, you could say that creationism is popular among those whose education doesn't include much of the stuff learnt since The Enlightenment.
Just remember that it was a creationist who invented the computer.
 
Upvote 0

RickG

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 1, 2011
10,092
1,430
Georgia
✟128,873.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Creationists don't like evolution because it shows how ridiculous their belief is and science because for them it's hard.

I disagree, Creationists don't like evolution because it conflicts with their view of Genesis 1. If you wish to think believing in God is ridiculous, your opinion is noted, and one of a minority, whether valid or not. Nevertheless, I do understand what you are trying to convey, I just disagree with your approach. ;)
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,269
52,669
Guam
✟5,159,647.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I disagree, Creationists don't like evolution because it conflicts with their view of Genesis 1. If you wish to think believing in God is ridiculous, your opinion is noted, and one of a minority, whether valid or not. Nevertheless, I do understand what you are trying to convey, I just disagree with your approach. ;)
You do realize Theistic Evolutionists are creationists too, do you not?
 
Upvote 0

RickG

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 1, 2011
10,092
1,430
Georgia
✟128,873.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
That's what it says in your profile.

I see, in reviewing my profile I didn't notice under the choices for life origins the word evolution off-set just below Theist. I thought I was just checking theist. From the choices available I guess that is closest to my beliefs except, I would prefer to drop the word evolutionist and just indicate Theist. When gets into describing theistic evolution I can imagine many different versions. I prefer to be known as one who just understands the theory of evolution.

I know, semantics. :)
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,269
52,669
Guam
✟5,159,647.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I see, in reviewing my profile I didn't notice under the choices for life origins the word evolution off-set just below Theist. I thought I was just checking theist. From the choices available I guess that is closest to my beliefs except, I would prefer to drop the word evolutionist and just indicate Theist. When gets into describing theistic evolution I can imagine many different versions. I prefer to be known as one who just understands the theory of evolution.

I know, semantics. :)
Ooookay ... where were we?

Oh, yes ...

You do realize Theistic Evolutionists are creationists too, do you not?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.