The best evidence for Creationism

[Wiccan_Child]

In the natural world, everything has a source or a cause.
Which proves that there must be a first-cause which must be super-natural.
Science proves a super natural source for existence, and Jesus explained who that was.

As did Vishnu. Praise Vishnu!

 

[AV1611VET]

Would this also not work for any creation myth?

Of course it would.

Would an evolution myth explain speciation?

 

[AV1611VET]

I'm sure you can give us a "Daffy-nition" of Kind.... right?

A kind is any animal that shares a common ancestor.

 

[AV1611VET]

As did Vishnu. Praise Vishnu!

Get the phone ... Aum Shinrikyo is calling.

 

[Split Rock]

A kind is any animal that shares a common ancestor.

So there is one Kind on earth, then. I'm cool with that.

 

[AV1611VET]

So there is one Kind on earth, then. I'm cool with that.

So we came from plants?

 

[Split Rock]

So we came from plants?

We came from a common ancestor... that ancestor was unicellular and wouldn't be recognized as a plant. Think of plants, animals and fungi as sister-taxa.

 

[Keachian]

Good point. Let's check.
Please speak up when you read about God's plan for
Natural selection used to Create a real man.
Please raise your hand high when you see it.

That's not what I was talking about at all, do you want to assert that the Bible is a history book recounting history from creation through to the second coming of Christ? If so where is the parts of the Bible that recount the splitting of the Church in the 11th Century? Or again in the 16th Century?

 

[Norman321]

Good point. Let's check.
Please speak up when you read about God's plan for
Natural selection used to Create a real man.
Please raise your hand high when you see it.

You make it look like every passage in the Bible is a witness against natural selection. Natural selection played a part in the creation of man. But a very small part.

 

[Norman321]

If so where is the parts of the Bible that recount the splitting of the Church in the 11th Century? Or again in the 16th Century?

You do realize that there are people that can show you that don't you?

1Cr 3:3 for you are still carnal. For where [there are] envy, strife, and
divisions among you, are you not carnal and behaving like [mere] men?

 

[Keachian]

You do realize that there are people that can show you that don't you?

1Cr 3:3 for you are still carnal. For where [there are] envy, strife, and
divisions among you, are you not carnal and behaving like [mere] men?

yeah because Paul was writing prophetically and not dealing with a problem in the Church at Corinth as the text suggests

 

[mathetes123]

That's not what I was talking about at all, do you want to assert that the Bible is a history book recounting history from creation through to the second coming of Christ? If so where is the parts of the Bible that recount the splitting of the Church in the 11th Century? Or again in the 16th Century?

You aren't suggesting the bible is not a historical account, are you?

 

[Norman321]

yeah because Paul was writing prophetically and not dealing with a problem in the Church at Corinth as the text suggests

There is a lot of prophecy in the Bible and lots of shaddows and types.

At that time Jesus said, "I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because You have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children. mat 11 25

 

[Keachian]

You aren't suggesting the bible is not a historical account, are you?

It's a theological book that contains historical accounts, there is an incredibly big difference and it is quite significant.

 

[Keachian]

There is a lot of prophecy in the Bible and lots of shaddows and types.

At that time Jesus said, "I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because You have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children. mat 11 25

but none of it has to do with the Reformation or Great Schism

 

[Norman321]

but none of it has to do with the Reformation or Great Schism

Then none of it has to do with the rapture or the tribulation. But this is really not the forum to have a discussion on dispensationism. IF you do not accept Darby's work, that is fine.

 

[Keachian]

It's really not worth my time or effort discussing what basically boils down to a hidden teaching in regards to the how of the second coming of Christ

 

[Norman321]

It's really not worth my time or effort discussing what basically boils down to a hidden teaching in regards to the how of the second coming of Christ

I suppose that is why you are here and not on the forum that talks about that subject.

 

[Davian]

Everything has a cause or source.

I understand that that is your opinion.

We exist. Life exists. To ignore existence with no clear reason for it is the lie.

And what is this reason for existence, in your opinion?

 

[SkyWriting]

Originally Posted by SkyWriting "Everything has a cause or source."

I understand that that is your opinion.
And what is this reason for existence, in your opinion?

Then you misunderstood me.
I was simply referring to the laws of physics.

Physics -- Newton's Laws of Motion - For Dummies

Newton's First Law


It's hard to fathom a reason if one is not familiar with the source or cause.