Not if there is no proof of any connection. And history is a fickle mistress.
We have no proof; just evidence. (See what I did there?)
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Not if there is no proof of any connection. And history is a fickle mistress.
We have no proof; just evidence. (See what I did there?)
Did they discover the missing link?
Two points here:
1) You don't seem to get the joke.
2) Use more precise terms. "Missing link" was used to describe the ancestor bridging humans to all other apes (Which we have). If that's really what you meant then yes. If you're talking about another common ancestor you've not heard about then by all means ask away.
What is the name of this missing link?
Guy1 said:It depends what you mean by "missing link." Between what two species?
Your know what I mean. What is the name of the missing link?
Your know what I mean. What is the name of the missing link?
Guy1 said:No I don't. Now stop using buzz words and ask an actual productive question.
You said yourself in a previous post that we had discovered the missing link. Quit avoiding the question and give the name of this missing link.
Got anything other than an "appeal to authority" list and a bunch of copy paste from non science sites?
There is nothing wrong with not believing in evolution. But to present deliberately misrepresented material about evolution or anything for that matter, is nothing short of bearing false witness.
The supporters of the Evolution Theory is the one bearing false witness by claiming that they found scientific proofs of transitions of all biological life forms on earth. I'm just simply exposing their lies for what it is: LIES.
The burden of proof is on the evolutionists; not supporters of creationism.
Yay for strawmen!
The strawmen argument always work for evolutionists.
The strawmen argument always work for evolutionists.
Yes but there are so many "missing links" (Or common ancestors as known by my people). It's difficult to tell which one you're talking about. The last common ancestor between gorillas and chimpanzees? Between humans and chimps? Humans and gorillas? How about between birds and dinosaurs? Maybe between monkeys and apes?
Did humans evolve from chimps or gorillas?
See, this I can work with. The answer is: Neither. We share a common ancestor with them. Our ancestor with chimp was very likely something close to Ardipithecus ramidus. I couldn't find our last ancestor with gorillas sadly. It seems the acidic rain in their habitat dissolves the bone quite quickly- preventing them from fossilizing.
I do not want to see what they consider to be a transition. I want to see thousands of them. There are hundreds of thousands of known fossils from the Cambrian Explosion, but NO transitions. They have not changed from the beginning, when they first show up to the end when they go extinct.claiming that they found scientific proofs of transitions of all biological life forms on earth.