Let's enumerate all the ways in which this argument is circular.
The first part assumes that the universe - which you would consider "an example of trillions of working circuits" - is A or B. Then the second part assumes that A and B require intelligence.
Both of your assumptions are part of your conclusion, that all these "circuits" are evidence of God.
It's only a circular argument if you can provide a physical example of a logical C option.
Living organisms contain lots of circuits. Intelligently designed things can certainly contain lots of active circuitry. What other example can you cite?
Upvote
0