Most reliable method of preserving doctrine?

[Montalban]

I think it's safe to assume the most reliable method of preserving doctrine is unmitigated power and forceful application.

Funny you don't have a clip of Protestant intolerance (or intolerence - never can get that)

 

[Uphill Battle]

Funny you don't have a clip of Protestant intolerance (or intolerence - never can get that)

this has nothing to do with protestent/catholic differences. I used a glaring example.

if you want a "protestant" one, here ya go.

YouTube - Preachers at GVSU- Argument

 

[LittleLambofJesus]

ultimately, I stopped in because I'm rather bored this evening. I'm under no illusion that anything changes!

Illusion or delusion?

NKJV) 2 Thessalonians 2:11 And for this reason God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie,

 

[sunlover1]

Funny you don't have a clip of Protestant intolerance (or intolerence - never can get that)

MacBooks have a built in spell check.
*struts away smirking
lol

this has nothing to do with protestent/catholic differences. I used a glaring example.

if you want a "protestant" one, here ya go.

YouTube - Preachers at GVSU- Argument

OMGosh, can you beat that.
Must be IRL GT lol.

 

[ivebeenshown]

Repost:

To answer it yet AGAIN, yes - self declaring self to be the Voice of God, infallible/unaccountable with the unmitigated POWER to exempt self from the issue of truth and instead require quiet,docilic submission to self is rejecting the Rule of Scripture

Oh, so Jesus did reject Sola Scriptura.

 

[CaliforniaJosiah]

Repost:

Oh, so Jesus did reject Sola Scriptura.

No, although God may ADD to His corpus of Scripture.
If you were God, perhaps you could, too.
But as you know, that issue is moot here. This thread is not about what is and is not Scripture or about why none on the planet agrees with your denomination on that issue - just itself exclusively.



.

 

[LittleLambofJesus]

Repost:

Oh, so Jesus did reject Sola Scriptura.

Don't know.......I am Solo Scriptura myself

http://www.christianforums.com/t7547378-27/#post57368063
Solo Scriptura and Sola Scriptura...is there a difference?

 

[Ortho_Cat]

lol.
So you've stopped by to see how the more things change
(not) the more they stay the same? Or did you wonder
if there was anything new under the sun?

Which makes the rest of us what?

Paul was not averse to enforcing correct doctrine and practice when the preservation of such was in question. He didn't hesitate to throw his authority around when the need arose. He makes this clear in his letters I believe.

If you had a precious treasure more valuable than anything on earth, to what length would you go to safeguard it?

 

[Ortho_Cat]

Don't know.......I am Solo Scriptura myself

http://www.christianforums.com/t7547378-27/#post57368063
Solo Scriptura and Sola Scriptura...is there a difference?

DIdn't we agree in a previous thread that the terminology solo scripture is more proper to use then solo scriptura? (all these latin grammar experts around here, ya know)

 

[MrPolo]

there needs to be a control.

Perhaps you missed my earlier post---Could you provide details on the "Liquori, charismatic, and feminist" or what it was you said that you thought were divisions in doctrine in Catholicism?

 

[Ortho_Cat]

No, although God may ADD to His corpus of Scripture.
If you were God, perhaps you could, too.
But as you know, that issue is moot here. This thread is not about what is and is not Scripture or about why none on the planet agrees with your denomination on that issue - just itself exclusively.

this thread is about the similarities that each side shares in common, not about one particular faith.

 

[sunlover1]

Paul was not averse to enforcing correct doctrine and practice when the preservation of such was in question. He didn't hesitate to throw his authority around when the need arose. He makes this clear in his letters I believe.

Love paul.. but what prompted this statement?

If you had a precious treasure more valuable than anything on earth, to what length would you go to safeguard it?

Oh believe me, I do have a precious treasure more valuable IMO, than anything
on earth...
but what are you speaking of in reference to Paul here?
(doctrine?)

 

[Ortho_Cat]

Love paul.. but what prompted this statement?

Oh believe me, I do have a precious treasure more valuable IMO, than anything
on earth...
but what are you speaking of in reference to Paul here?
(doctrine?)

Just sayin, Paul was an enforcer, among other things...

 

[sunlover1]

Just sayin, Paul was an enforcer, among other things...

Paul was way cool.
I especially enjoyed 'listening' to his "bragging" speech.
Oh was he hot when he wrote that letter or what? lol

 

[LittleLambofJesus]

Just sayin, Paul was an enforcer, among other things...

Me thinks Harry Callahan was Paul reincarnated

Young) 1 Corinthians 4:21 what do ye wish? with a rod shall I come unto you, or in love, with a spirit also of meekness?

YouTube - Dirty Harry in THE ENFORCER - Theatrical Trailer

 

[Montalban]

Me thinks Harry Callahan was Paul reincarnated

I thought of "Jesus is Way Cool" by King Missile

 

[Montalban]

this has nothing to do with protestent/catholic differences. I used a glaring example.

if you want a "protestant" one, here ya go.

YouTube - Preachers at GVSU- Argument

It's true the film often differs from the book!

 

[Montalban]

MacBooks have a built in spell check.
*struts away smirking
lol

What's a MacBook? Something from a fast-food restaurant?

 

[Montalban]

No, although God may ADD to His corpus of Scripture.
If you were God, perhaps you could, too.
But as you know, that issue is moot here. This thread is not about what is and is not Scripture or about why none on the planet agrees with your denomination on that issue - just itself exclusively.



.

What happened in the interim? Jesus using parables, but they weren't yet written down.

Sola Scritpurists would be in there with the Pharisees, dismissing anything not 'written'.

 

[sunlover1]

What's a MacBook? Something from a fast-food restaurant?

Hey now lol