If you're talking about me, I consider that a compliment; but I'm probably five times faster than any bot could post here.Either you're all attempting to troll a troll, or you really don't see that the member in question could well be a human who also sometimes uses a bot to post.
Either you're all attempting to troll a troll, or you really don't see that the member in question could well be a human who also sometimes uses a bot to post.
Digital thinking; if not A then B.
Are there no other alternatives? You would not be alone if so; there are a lot of people on this board who think in binary terms. Or perhaps binary 'thinking' is itself evidence of computer generated posts. That is an intriguing thought; if so AV is not alone; we have hundreds of them.
I have modified my theory in light of AV1611VET's reply, and have added a third alternative, which I now belive to be most likely.
No, I'm not telling
I can't.I do not believe AV1611VET can be a real person. I postulate that he is a chatbot (yecbot) program that has been running on the Christian Forums servers for the last several years just to keep us all amused. And to keep the number counting threads alive of course.
Now convince me otherwise.
Either you're all attempting to troll a troll, or you really don't see that the member in question could well be a human who also sometimes uses a bot to post.
You speak English well.Of course, it is as important as "you" or any other word. Unfortunatelly my English is not that good and I may misuse it sometimes.
You sound like a programmer.That is AV's random number thread. Obviously its random number algorithm is flawed, as are the rest of the algorithms...
You sound awfully nice.I maybe write it well... sometimes. But I speak it awfully.
You too. Computers have as much alternatives as you program them to have.
Would you complain if I have killed you and then raised you from the dead?
When you think don't you weigh up a whole lot of conditions before you make a decision? A program works in the same way. Everything is 0 or 1 when you break it down to it's fundamental level, even with humans.The alternatives exist at the level of meaning. They do not exist at the level of programming, which is the level that computers function at.
At programming level there is either 0 or 1. In or out, on or off, black or white, with us or against us, Christian or infidel; you can interpret these as you like. It is binary thinking, every time we polarise the world into two categories, with no exceptions.