Q For Darwinists: Are Fish Birds or Dinosaurs?

[AV1611VET]

But you are the one who compared homo erectus to king David just before he died.

No, I didn't -- I compared that silhouette of yours to David.

Let me make this perfectly clear: I don't not believe there is such a thing as Homo erectus, Homo sapiens, or that other Homo thing (Neanderthalis?).

For about the 5th time, they were contributing members of society at one time.

 

[Assyrian]

Except God pronounced His creation "very good"

If copy errors can be used to produce all the life on earth, they are very good.

"very good" (perfect) in Genesis 1:31.

Which does the AV say? "Very good" or "perfect"?

 

[LifeToTheFullest!]

You can look at the car occasionally breaking down, or you can look at the integrated complexity of the car. Either way, it is designed.

I was talking about the human body.

 

[AV1611VET]

You go with Aristotle not the literal interpretation of Genesis?

When it comes to spontaneous generation, I have to attribute it to someone.

I could tell you where I really think spontaneous generation and evolution come from, but I'm afraid you wouldn't understand.

 

[Assyrian]

No, I didn't -- I compared that silhouette of yours to David.

Can't be. No girls.

Let me make this perfectly clear: I don't not believe there is such a thing as Homo erectus, Homo sapiens, or that other Homo thing (Neanderthalis?).

For about the 5th time, they were contributing members of society at one time.

Including our eleven year old Turkana Boy?

 

[Assyrian]

When it comes to spontaneous generation, I have to attribute it to someone.

I could tell you where I really think spontaneous generation and evolution come from, but I'm afraid you wouldn't understand.

St Basil thought it came from God saying "let he earth produce living creatures."

 

[AV1611VET]

If copy errors can be used to produce all the life on earth, they are very good.

Except there's a virtual graveyard of trials-and-errors behind everything that survives.

If you're going to attribute evolution to God, don't just attribute the successes, attribute all those plants and animals that died in the process as well.

The smell alone should make you a literalist.

 

[Greg1234]

I was talking about the human body.

It was an analogy. Of course the human body is much more complex than the car but eh, it works.

 

[MoonLancer]

Here's your 'trixy Satan':

Put them both together, and you have:

and?

 

[LifeToTheFullest!]

It was an analogy. Of course the human body is much more complex than the car but eh, it works.

Until you can make a car that can sexually reproduce, I don't accept your analogy.

 

[Belk]

Except God pronounced His creation "very good" (perfect) in Genesis 1:31.

Here is a thread I started some time ago on this subject: 1

Wait, how do you get "Very Good"="Perfect"? That seems kind of a stretch.

 

[Greg1234]

Until you can make a car that can sexually reproduce, I don't accept your analogy.

The process of human reproduction is more complex than a car.

 

[MoonLancer]

It was an analogy. Of course the human body is much more complex than the car but eh, it works.

I think its incredibly funny that creationists point to non living things to show how that living things were created. non living tings are lacking in all the features that allow evolution to work.

 

[AV1611VET]

Wait, how do you get "Very Good"="Perfect"? That seems kind of a stretch.

Stretch on over to Ezekiel and compare spiritual things to spiritual:

Ezekiel 28:15 Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee.

God created Lucifer perfect, but then the entire rest of His creation sub-perfect?

Even if 'perfect' isn't the word -- (and it is) -- the fact that God did it would leave no room for improvement.

 

[LifeToTheFullest!]

The process of human reproduction is more complex than a car.

Really? How so?

 

[LifeToTheFullest!]

Stretch on over to Ezekiel and compare spiritual things to spiritual:

Ezekiel 28:15 Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee.

God created Lucifer perfect, but then the entire rest of His creation sub-perfect?

Even if 'perfect' isn't the word -- (and it is) -- the fact that God did it would leave no room for improvement.

Internal consistency does seem to be a problem with your scriptures.

 

[Greg1234]

Really? How so?

Begin with the use of nano technology, then the ability to carry the car factory within the car. The details of the aforementioned and the rest of the process you can look up in modern science.

 

[LifeToTheFullest!]

Begin with the use of nano technology, then the ability to carry the car factory within the car. The details of the aforementioned and the rest of the process you can look up in modern science.

Been there, done that. Which is why I do not consider the human body to be designed.

 

[Greg1234]

Been there, done that. Which is why I do not consider the human body to be designed.

Been there done that, which is why I consider the human body designed. Confirmed through testing.

 

[AV1611VET]

Internal consistency does seem to be a problem with your scriptures.

Why? because they don't spoon-feed you the deep things of God all on one page?

You want 'internal consistency' problems with scripture?

How many times has the "second bible" been rewritten?