• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Art appreciation 101: Touchdown Jesus

tadoflamb

no identificado
Feb 20, 2007
16,415
7,531
Diocese of Tucson
✟74,331.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Touchdown_jesus.jpg


This is my first installment on religious art. Today we'll be discussing the sculpture 'Touchdown Jesus'.

Touchdown Jesus came into prominence among Christian circles lately when it was struck by lightening and subsequently burnt to the ground. While speculation has run rampant on exactly why Touchdown Jesus was struck down by lightening, most sober and right-thinking individuals lean towards the opinion that God smote the sculpture simply because it was 'bad art'. This article attempts to address exactly what is wrong with Touchdown Jesus.

Firstly, all good religious art references a point in scripture which should be immediately recognized by the viewer. Although a tertiary look at our subject gives the impression of the risen Lord, certainly no article of scripture comes to my mind. Hence, the unflattering moniker Touchdown Jesus. A more critical examination might remind the viewer more of St. Peter after taking those few fateful steps out of the boat into a raging storm.

Which brings to to my next and more aesthetical point. Aside from the awkward pose imitating an American football what is as equally or more distracting is the way the artist chose to clumsily amputate our subject at the chest thus only only succeeding in making our Lord look not so much as if He were celebrating an exhillarating score, but more as if He were floundering in the shallows of a small pond.

And then there's the, as one critic put it, the "discombobulated conglomeration of assorted religious symbols". Verily, the cross which lies one quarter submerged has all appearances of a mis-guided afterthought. Proportionally it does not relate to the figure and the viewer has to ask himself if it's only there because the figure, with it's nordic like appearance, is so poorly rendered, it's barely recognizable as the risen Lord.

And finally, one has to consider the materials of which Touchdown Jesus was constructed. All aspects of a creation, materials included, will tell you something of the creator. Touchdown Jesus, with it's fiberglass and foam exterior over a steel skeleton, reflects spendidly the facade and lack of permanence which describes modern western Christianity.

And that concludes this installment of Art appreciation 101. Please feel free to add your own comment and look forward to my next installment when I critique the Monument of the Reformers, an equally aestheticlly impoverished work of art, in Geneva, Switzerland.

Until then,

Pax tecum :crossrc:
 
Last edited: