B
brightmorningstar
Guest
To Psudopod,
And my answer is as it takes both sexes to reproduce the children nature has provided two sexes so a same sex couple is at odds with what nature has provided.
Also you have mixed the information, those related are also more appropriate to raise the children than same sex coupled by their sexual dysfunction.
And there are all kinds of studies around with all kinds of agendas which don’t reflect reality.
Think about it, with a male/female couple, if it is a girl then the girl at least has a female parent, if it’s a boy the boy at least has a male parent. I mean, if the sex of the parents and children isn’t important than where is the basis of your argument, just have what exists in reality, both male and female.
because of man/woman couples so its crucial that’s why I pointed it out.No, we’re talking about children who are already in existence.
Yes its outside reality if there are two sexes which reproduce. The only reason you pose the question is because you don’t recognise the reality.I’m asking if you have any evidence that a same sex couple would do worse at raising a child, compared to an opposite sex one.
And my answer is as it takes both sexes to reproduce the children nature has provided two sexes so a same sex couple is at odds with what nature has provided.
Yes of course why do you think two sexes exist in the first place? Just because it doesn’t fit your particular worldview doesn’t mean its not reality.But does raising the child require two parents, one of each sex?
This is largely true, but there are also tales of animals raising children, but nature or God has given us male and female so between same sex and male and female, male and female is what society should have.Given that historically, a child may have be raised by a group of related females (mother, grandmother, older sisters, aunts etc) or completely unrelated adults (wet nurse, nanny, tutors, governess etc); and in modern societies studies have shown that children raised by same sex parents suffer no detriment mentally, physically, educationally etc when compared with peers raised by opposite sex parents, why do you think it is necessary to restrict the number of potential adoptive parents.
Also you have mixed the information, those related are also more appropriate to raise the children than same sex coupled by their sexual dysfunction.
And there are all kinds of studies around with all kinds of agendas which don’t reflect reality.
Think about it, with a male/female couple, if it is a girl then the girl at least has a female parent, if it’s a boy the boy at least has a male parent. I mean, if the sex of the parents and children isn’t important than where is the basis of your argument, just have what exists in reality, both male and female.
So as I didn’t ask you that I’ll ask again. My question to you is why propose a one sex only couple when the whole question of children requires both sexes?I’m not proposing it like it’s a new thing. Same sex couples exist, many raise children, some of whom are adopted. Why should this stop?
Upvote
0