Why is "Big Bang' so important to Creationists?

[Washington]

LOL​

Oh no, out of all of the people upon God's Earth, you have got the gall, the nerve, and/or the audacity to futilely attempt to talk about Newtonian physics, etc. I am 100% sure that you did not even graduate high school, and as valid proof of your level of ineptness your lexicon and coherency are still in desperate need of improvement; and you DO NOT even realize that you're suppose to capitalize every individual's names (genius).

WTG ​

Yeah, forgetting to capitalize "every individuals names" is pretty important here; especially when it's Zone's. Much more so than communicative grammar.

"Pick a little, talk a little, pick a little, talk a little
Cheep cheep cheep, talk a lot, pick a little more"

​

 

[Zone]

Yeah, forgetting to capitalize "every individuals names" is pretty important here; especially when it's Zone's. Much more so than communicative grammar.

"Pick a little, talk a little, pick a little, talk a little
Cheep cheep cheep, talk a lot, pick a little more"

​

Besides from being 100% incorrect Washington, shh, if you keep on talking (& do not settle for being seen & not heard) everyone will be able to see that there's no level to your ineptness.

 

[Tomk80]

Okay, this is going nowhere. If people keep on 'discussing' with Zone I'm going to hijack this thread. Since speakout stopped posting after his last thread about skunks and his next thread would be about angler fish:

If people keep responding to Zone this thread will be about Angler fish.

Sorry Hespera, but unless you can get this (your) thread back on topic, it has run its course.

 

[MaxP]

LOL

Zone, it's time to find a new word besides "inept," and a new tact besides being an a** and calling people inept. Either you debate someone based on the merit of their argument, or don't post. You debate by trying to ridicule someone else's level of education and personal hygiene(hasn't happened yet, but its a matter of minutes, I'll bet). So, either back off the personal attacks and the smug arrogant **** or just get off the board. Present an argument and debate it intelligently, rather than making yourself look like a fool.

Although I must say, you have a high success at making yourself look foolish and arrogant, Zone.


</rant>

Anyway, Creationists stick to attacking the Big Bang because it is an easier thing to argue against than actual evolution.

 

[Hespera]

Thanks TOMK

QUOTE:Okay, this is going nowhere. If people keep on 'discussing' with Zone I'm going to hijack this thread. Since speakout stopped posting after his last thread about skunks and his next thread would be about angler fish:

If people keep responding to Zone this thread will be about Angler fish.

Sorry Hespera, but unless you can get this (your) thread back on topic, it has run its course.<<<<<<<<<<<<


There isnt any way to get it back on track with that guy in it. Next time i start a thread if i do i will request that it be a zone free zone.

I think we are better than this kind of stuff.

I am sorry I started answering him, it makes me feel sort of cheap and dirty.

Anyway i wont do it any more and I am done with this thread. I did have an actual idea in mind in the first place, and was trying to figure something out, about how different people explain things to themselves. But there is no way to get there from here. As far as i am concerned the thread is closed.

 

[Tomk80]

Sorry Hespera, but I did give a fair warning.

This thread is now about angler fish.

<Snip post not about Anglerfish>

Now, according to wiki, angler fish have a characteristic fleshy growth from their heads called an esca, which serves as a lure for prey. They come in various forms, open sea, bottom dwellers and deep sea.

Here an example of bottom feeder variant of angler fish, living in New Zealand.

 

[Tomk80]

As far as i am concerned the thread is closed.

No, it's only now starting.

Picture of an angler fish found around Norway. Here unfortunately dead and for sale (and probably eaten by now).

 

[MaxP]

Sorry Hespera, but I did give a fair warning.

This thread is now about angler fish.



Now, according to wiki, angler fish have a characteristic fleshy growth from their heads called an esca, which serves as a lure for prey. They come in various forms, open sea, bottom dwellers and deep sea.

Here an example of bottom feeder variant of angler fish, living in New Zealand.

Where are anglers most abundant?

 

[Tomk80]

Where are anglers most abundant?

From what I can find, you can find them in almost all marine environments all over the world. There are only a few species living in brackish or fresh water however. Looking at the tree of life website, the number of species is actually a lot higher and more diverse than I originally thought, with 322 living species discovered up to now. So they've probably diversified quite a lot, although not many have developed away from their marine ancestors apparently.

 

[Washington]

Besides from being 100% incorrect Washington, shh, if you keep on talking (& do not settle for being seen & not heard) everyone will be able to see that there's no level to your ineptness.

Lacking any level of "ineptness" I can only assume I must be completely ept (apt). And because I assume you regard the two of us as pretty much opposites, I take your remark to mean you have a fair level of ineptness. So, congrats on your ineptitude, Zone, I'm sure achieving it wasn't much of a challenge at all.

 

[Zone]

Okay, this is going nowhere. If people keep on 'discussing' with Zone I'm going to hijack this thread. Since speakout stopped posting after his last thread about skunks and his next thread would be about angler fish:

If people keep responding to Zone this thread will be about Angler fish.

Sorry Hespera, but unless you can get this (your) thread back on topic, it has run its course.

Shh.

 

[Zone]

Lacking any level of "ineptness" I can only assume I must be completely ept (apt). And because I assume you regard the two of us as pretty much opposites, I take your remark to mean you have a fair level of ineptness. So, congrats on your ineptitude, Zone, I'm sure achieving it wasn't much of a challenge at all.

Your attempts to sound intelligent only delineates even more unnecessary incoherency.

 

[MaxP]

From what I can find, you can find them in almost all marine environments all over the world. There are only a few species living in brackish or fresh water however. Looking at the tree of life website, the number of species is actually a lot higher and more diverse than I originally thought, with 322 living species discovered up to now. So they've probably diversified quite a lot, although not many have developed away from their marine ancestors apparently.

That's pretty interesting. I'm beginning to suspect Zone is an angler fish.
I wonder if they're good for fishing.

 

[Hespera]

Angler fish. Yes, i took an ichthyology course. I have seen some of those in the market also. I believe the fish sold as "poor man's lobster" is a type of angler fish. Personally I think they are too cool to be used as food.

That is what i have to say about angler fish.

 

[Washington]

Your attempts to sound intelligent only delineates even more unnecessary incoherency.

The only thing more tiresome than pretentious verbosity is pretentious verbosity coupled with sesquipedality, particularly when the words are so poorly chosen.

A friendly suggestion:

​

 

[corvus_corax]

Your attempts to sound intelligent only delineates even more unnecessary incoherency.

You broke my irony meter btw

 

[Zone]

LOL

Zone, it's time to find a new word besides "inept," and a new tact besides being an a** and calling people inept.

I prerequisite you must desist being pusillanimously timorous.....

Either you debate someone based on the merit of their argument, or don't post.

Are you in a alternate universe...? The last time I'd checked certain individuals argument(s) has absolutely (0) zero scientific &, or mathematical foundation(s) &, or base(s) within this (space &#916; time) spatial dimension, therefore it merited being immediately placed within the nonsensical category, or file.

You debate by trying to ridicule someone else's level of education and personal hygiene(hasn't happened yet, but its a matter of minutes, I'll bet).

Hum... Incorrect, (relative to some of their malodorous vacuously fatuous rhetoric) I simply state the obvious.

So, either back off the personal attacks and the smug arrogant **** or just get off the board.

Puerilism colloquialism, inarticulate oratory.

Present an argument and debate it intelligently, rather than making yourself look like a fool.

Are you in a alternate universe...? The last time I'd checked not (1) one of my post(s) has been, can be &, or will ever be confuted (courtesy of The Lord my God i.e., &#1488;&#1514; &#1492;&#1513;&#1497;&#1500;&#1493;&#1513; &#1492;&#1511;&#1491;&#1493;&#1513; & therefore they have absolutely (100%) one-hundred percent scientific &, or mathematical foundation(s) &, or base(s) within this (space &#916; time) spatial dimension.

Although I must say, you have a high success at making yourself look foolish and arrogant, Zone.

Cretin fallacious cacology.

Anyway, Creationists stick to attacking the Big Bang because it is an easier thing to argue against than actual evolution.

Conspicuous, injudicious ostentate aberrant eccentricity unequivocally.

 

[Zone]

The only thing more tiresome than pretentious verbosity is pretentious verbosity coupled with sesquipedality, particularly when the words are so poorly chosen.

A friendly suggestion:

​

Idiocy

 

[Zone]

Not (1) one non-Christian (i.e., believes evolution, natural selection, Darwinism) has ever provided any proof to validate anything he, or she has said, to-date.

Hot air they are......

 

[Washington]

Idiocy

Well, that sharp-witted comeback sure put me in MY place.