That's an opinion, not a fact, and an opinion purporting a lie. Rights are also not a 'if you give me this, maaaybe I'll letcha not get gay bashed' game. Human rights are not a card game, they are basic decency and respect.
Now, given the previous post to yours, I imagine this is about teaching Christianity in school. I would also like you to know that the classrooms are not a place for debate unless the basis of the lesson is about debate. If every possible theory in science were taught kids would never learn, and therefore the curricula is narrowed down to the most pertinent and widly accepted theories. I'm sorry to say, that pseudoscience doesn't fit that bill, and therefore Creationism is not a valid topic for science class. If you want your children to be ill prepared for college, put them in private school.
You might take offense at my calling Creationism pseudoscience. I give you the first sentence of wikipedia for pseudoscience:
"Pseudoscience is defined as a body of knowledge, methodology, belief, or practice that is claimed to be scientific or made to appear scientific, but does not adhere to the scientific method"
It's a good definition, but wikipedia is hardly a great source, therefore I give you a more official, but less descriptive definition from the princeton wordnet:
"an activity resembling science but based on fallacious assumptions"
Now, part of the scientific method is the requirement that any hypothesis must be falsifiable. This means that if I give a hypothesis, such as creationism, then this hypothesis must a)make a prediction and b)be capable of being proven false.
Creationism makes the claim that a god, gods, or other intelligent entity put life upon this planet. It has made many claims, but all have been shot down quite thoroughly. It's failed to produce anything of scientific value, and has failed to have any papers that I know of published about it from reputable peer-reviewed journals. Further, a claim of an intelligent, potentially omnipotent creator cannot be falsified, it cannot be proven wrong, for the same reason that one cannot prove or disprove the existence of God. By attempting to teach creationism in class you are attempting to claim that God can be falsified, because to falsify creationism you must be able to falsify God. This is patently untrue, and therefore creationism is pseudoscience and not real science. Pseudoscience doesn't belong in the class room, if it did, we'd still be giving people mercury enemas.
Nota Bene: Notice I used the term hypothesis, it's important to draw a distinction between a scientific theory and a hypothesis. The laymen definition of theory is the definition of a hypothesis, and the laymen definition of a fact is the scientific definition of a theory. Scientific facts are rare indeed. Evolution is a theory, it has a supporting body of proof, Creationism is at best a hypothesis, it has little or no supporting body of proof. We don't teach our kids unproven hypothesis' in school. So Creationism is doubly failed either by being defined pseudoscience or by being no more than 'just a hypothesis'.
Excellent post.
Upvote
0