On that wedding pavilion issue -- if this is the story out of New Jersey, it's a bizarre situation. The town was originally founded by the Methodist Episcopal Church as a seaside retreat center. Later it became incorporated as a community and lost its relationship with the Methodist Church (except, of course, there was a local congregation with a building there). The pavilion was on town land, belonged to the town, but had largely been used by the church, which mistakenly felt it had some authority over it. The church was not forced to do anything except give up its erroneous claim to control what could be done in a town-owned facility.
Several less-than-honest "family values" websites have claimed this as a case of gays forcing a church to do something. It wasn't (other than their being told that their predominant use of the town's pavilion didn't give them exclusive rights to say who could or could not be married there).
Based on the Gospel and Apostolic testimony, a Church would be far less than honest to celebrate an atheist or, same-gender marriage. No different than some Molech worshippers asking a Pastor to bless their way of life and his Church to be used for a service marking a commitment to abomination.
Upvote
0