• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

My Human Chromosome 2 Challenge

Naraoia

Apprentice Biologist
Sep 30, 2007
6,682
313
On edge
Visit site
✟23,498.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Google confirms that at least genus Drosophila and Rattus feature fused chromosomes. Unfortunately most of them are subsription only and only show up in the google description so I can't really link to them.
Knowing they exist is enough for the purposes of this thread :)
 
Upvote 0

sfs

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2003
10,863
7,882
65
Massachusetts
✟397,774.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I find that there is no one definition of what creationists believe and accept, even though a lot of them claim to be Bible literalists.
True, but it is difficult to find a creationist these days who doesn't accept evolution within species.
 
Upvote 0

MasterOfKrikkit

Regular Member
Feb 1, 2008
673
117
USA
✟23,935.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Private
It may be that not everyone understands the evidence you are referring to in this OP. I suggest that you explain briefly what is special about Chromosome #2, what telomeres are, etc. Then you can provide a link or two that explains it in more detail. Just a suggestion. :)

Thanks, SR. I did consider doing this, but
1) the OP was a bit long already
2) I was assuming those who had an answer had already considered the problem, so would know about it already
3) I'm no biologist so wouldn't be able to give the best summary
4) Wiki/Google, people! Seriously, do I have to do everything around here :p
5) I'm lazy
6) Oh, well, ok. It might aid some possible lurkers, so...

Humans have one pair fewer chromosomes than all the other Great Apes. This was trumpeted by creationists as an impossible sticking point for common descent, as an organism's offspring can't just miss an entire chromosome. But then science discovered something very interesting about Human Chromosome 2... The ends and middles of chromosomes are marked by "blobs" of genetic information called telomeres and centromeres (respectively), but Chr 2 has two centromeres and a "misplaced" telomere site in the middle (ie something like t---c---t---c---t). This is completely wrong for a normal chromosome, but exactly what you'd expect to see if two normal chromosomes fused end-to-end. Moreover, the two halves of this chromosome correspond very closely to two separate chromosomes in apes (2A & 2B -- used to be something else, can't remember the numbers -- EDIT: 12 & 13, apparently. Yay Google.). Therefore, it is very strong evidence that humans used to have the same chromosomes as the other apes, but they fused at some point in the past. That's evolution, and also evidence of common descent.

Wiki linkage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromosome_2_%28human%29
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

MasterOfKrikkit

Regular Member
Feb 1, 2008
673
117
USA
✟23,935.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Private
tl;dr.

Short answer: Goddidit to fool you, evil one.

Q.


I reject modern "scholarship" that claims that "F" is a better translation of the original Hebrew. Some 17th century translators said it should be "Q", and that settles it.
 
Upvote 0

MasterOfKrikkit

Regular Member
Feb 1, 2008
673
117
USA
✟23,935.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Private
Sounds fair to me --- but if they can't --- I hope they're like me. I couldn't care less if a real spaceship landed here, and real aliens got out and yelled:

  • Stop it! Stop this arguing! We did it - okay? It was we who seeded this planet with Sapien Spores and nurtured you with Evolution Solution until you were able to grow on your own! Now stop this bickering!
I'd tell them, of course, to take a hike.

What if God did that? You haven't contradicted Split Rock's assertion that you'd tell Jesus to take a hike... is that an admission? Dad's already answered this (in another thread) -- I believe he said he'd "kick His ass". Your view?
 
Upvote 0

Nathan Poe

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2002
32,198
1,693
51
United States
✟41,319.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
What if God did that? You haven't contradicted Split Rock's assertion that you'd tell Jesus to take a hike... is that an admission? Dad's already answered this (in another thread) -- I believe he said he'd "kick His ass". Your view?

AV's view is what it always is -- truth can take a hike
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,271
52,669
Guam
✟5,160,256.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
What if God did that? You haven't contradicted Split Rock's assertion that you'd tell Jesus to take a hike... is that an admission? Dad's already answered this (in another thread) -- I believe he said he'd "kick His ass". Your view?
For the nth time --- I'd tell him, "Get thee behind me."
 
Upvote 0

AintNoMonkey

Regular Member
Jan 24, 2008
948
63
Midwest US
✟23,926.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
You would tell Jesus Christ, "Get thee behind me???"

What kind of a Christian are you, again?

He says this to skirt the question. He assumes that he cannot know that it is Jesus, and as what this person says is contridictory to his belief, it must be SATAN. He does this because he is scared to address the intent of the question. Pretty typical AV.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,271
52,669
Guam
✟5,160,256.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You would tell Jesus Christ, "Get thee behind me???"

What kind of a Christian are you, again?
Anyone telling me mankind was created in any other way than how the Bible describes it in writing can take a hike.
 
Upvote 0

MasterOfKrikkit

Regular Member
Feb 1, 2008
673
117
USA
✟23,935.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Private
Anyone telling me mankind was created in any other way than how the Bible describes it in writing can take a hike.

Including God Almighty Himself? Oookaaay. And yet it's us atheistic evilutionists that are committing blasphemy. Right.

Anyway, I take it that you can't explain HC2. I guess it can take a hike.
 
Upvote 0

MasterOfKrikkit

Regular Member
Feb 1, 2008
673
117
USA
✟23,935.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Private
The fusion event was a result of the Fall. It was humans that sinned against God, not other animals, which is why only we suffered the fusion event.

Have you actually heard this, or were you just trying to play ... er ... devil's advocate?

As has been pointed out, this seems easy to debunk: other animals have fusions and there doesn't seem to be any reason why such a genetic glitch would be evidence of sinful nature. (Also, it still implies evolution, so I assume you're taking the role of a creationist that allows microevolution.)
 
Upvote 0

us38

im in ur mind, disturben ur sanities
Jan 5, 2007
661
35
✟23,508.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Anyone telling me mankind was created in any other way than how the Bible describes it in writing can take a hike.

Further proof that what creationists worship isn't god.
 
Upvote 0

MasterOfKrikkit

Regular Member
Feb 1, 2008
673
117
USA
✟23,935.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Private
Creationist answer:
Humans were created (via special creation) with the same number of chromosomes as apes. Shortly thereafter there was a chromosome fusion event in one of the early humans, and we all inherited the fused chromosome.

Ah, good ol' microevolution*, but no common descent... not bad. Now what about the massive similarities between the halves of HC2 and chimp chromosomes 2A & 2B? And how do we still deal with a deceptive God? (Shouldn't God have made sure such a deceptive (micro)evolutionary event didn't occur?)

BTW, surely the fusion would have been with Cain, otherwise we wouldn't all have it. Or Noah, perhaps.

ETA: same question for you, too, as for Pesto: have you actually encountered this answer?


*"4 out of 5 Gods of the Gaps prefer Microevolution(TM)"
 
Upvote 0

MoonLancer

The Moon is a reflection of the MorningStar
Aug 10, 2007
5,765
166
✟29,524.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Anyone telling me mankind was created in any other way than how the Bible describes it in writing can take a hike.

I took that hike. Ah nature is good. Their is much evidence and truth to be found.
 
Upvote 0

MoonLancer

The Moon is a reflection of the MorningStar
Aug 10, 2007
5,765
166
✟29,524.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Anyone telling me mankind was created in any other way than how the Bible describes it in writing can take a hike.

Is it possible a blasphemer wrote the bible to spite God? It would make sense considering his monsters portrayal.
 
Upvote 0