What I'm getting from you "scientists" here, is that when you were little, you had "tough questions about the Bible" that you asked your church leaders (always them, not your parents), and they told you to "stop asking stupid questions."
That is
not how it worked for me. Everyone has "tough questions" for the Bible as they are growing up. But I didn't push the Bible too hard. I accepted the "explanations" that were given me. I wasn't a literalist so I didn't have to deal with as
much mind-bending, but I was pretty sure the spiritual details were there.
Thankfully as a child I didn't read much of the bible or I would have been quite confused about the God-sanctioned bloodbath that is much of the early parts of the O.T. But instead I was introduced, as all
civilized people are today, to the "gentle face" of the Bible and Jesus, the all-loving god with a smile and a soft touch for the little lambikins.
Only when I got older and started to wonder if what I thought was "spiritual truth" was actually in any way
meaningful.
I tested the world around me. And finally sat down to read The Book. Front to back (sans apocrypha). AND, I read some history. How we know, what we know and why we think it is so.
So you said to yourselves, "Forget this --- I'll get my answers (to the Bible?) from science when I grow up."
No, most of us say "I'll get my answers from thoughtful
analysis of what is presented to us." If you wish to call this getting spiritual information from science, then so be it. I call it a reasonable way to analyze information presented to me.
I suspect you do the exact same thing in your (presumptive) rejection of Hinduism as the One True Faith. Or your rejection of Islam as the One Path to God.
You see, we all
reject some things. And I bet if I asked you why you
refuse to give your life over to Al'lah's Immutable Will and do that which is commanded of his Followers, that you'd have some pretty clever
analyses.