• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

What's up with that?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sophia7

Tall73's Wife
Site Supporter
Sep 24, 2005
12,364
456
✟84,145.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That's an automatic PM that's sent by the system whenever a report that you've made is closed. The auto PM doesn't actually say what action, if any, has been taken because that isn't discussed with the reporter. You shouldn't have gotten it if you haven't reported anyone, though. Could be a bug. Or it could be that because of the coding to protect the identity of the reporter, you're showing up as the OP in the reports on you, in which case, the auto PM would be sent to you even though you were not actually the reporter.
 
Upvote 0

RND

Senior Veteran
Jul 20, 2006
7,807
145
Victorville, California, CorpUSA
Visit site
✟31,272.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
That's an automatic PM that's sent by the system whenever a report that you've made is closed. The auto PM doesn't actually say what action, if any, has been taken because that isn't discussed with the reporter. You shouldn't have gotten it if you haven't reported anyone, though. Could be a bug. Or it could be that because of the coding to protect the identity of the reporter, you're showing up as the OP in the reports on you, in which case, the auto PM would be sent to you even though you were not actually the reporter.

Hey thanks Sophia but I got a PM from a moderator that let me know that these notices of a closed reports come to those that have been reported against, not those who report.

Even though your post here contains conflicting information I appreciate you post none the less.
 
Upvote 0

Sophia7

Tall73's Wife
Site Supporter
Sep 24, 2005
12,364
456
✟84,145.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hey thanks Sophia but I got a PM from a moderator that let me know that these notices of a closed reports come to those that have been reported against, not those who report.

Even though your post here contains conflicting information I appreciate you post none the less.

That's because, due to the software coding now, the reported person appears as the reporter. It used to be that only the actual reporter would get that PM, and the wording must not have been updated since you said that the PMs you received referred to reports that you had made even though you hadn't made any. Things have changed since they made the reports semi-open again.
 
Upvote 0

RND

Senior Veteran
Jul 20, 2006
7,807
145
Victorville, California, CorpUSA
Visit site
✟31,272.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
That's because, due to the software coding now, the reported person appears as the reporter.

Yet initially you said:

That's an automatic PM that's sent by the system whenever a report that you've made is closed.

I appreciate your willingness to answer the question but if you could, in the future, make sure the information is correct.

It used to be that only the actual reporter would get that PM, and the wording must not have been updated since you said that the PMs you received referred to reports that you had made even though you hadn't made any. Things have changed since they made the reports semi-open again.

This is what a PM that came to me just the other day said regarding a report that was filed against me:

Re: Your report from - Discussion and Debate - RND 24-2-2008 - was Closed on 02-23-20
 
Upvote 0

Sophia7

Tall73's Wife
Site Supporter
Sep 24, 2005
12,364
456
✟84,145.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That's because, due to the software coding now, the reported person appears as the reporter.

Yet initially you said:

That's an automatic PM that's sent by the system whenever a report that you've made is closed.
I appreciate your willingness to answer the question but if you could, in the future, make sure the information is correct.

My information is correct, and you can stop being condescending anytime, RND. I did not realize until you posted this thread that the actual reporter was not still getting those auto-PMs, so thank you for bringing that to my attention.

What you are not understanding is that the system now recognizes you as both the reporter and the reportee, even though obviously you could not have reported yourself. That way you can read and respond in the reports on you, but the identity of the actual reporter is protected. So you are getting the auto PMs that used to be sent only to the reporter because the software thinks that you are the reporter.

RND said:
This is what a PM that came to me just the other day said regarding a report that was filed against me:

Re: Your report from - Discussion and Debate - RND 24-2-2008 - was Closed on 02-23-20

Yes, that's the same auto-PM that used to be sent to the actual reporter. "Your report" refers to a report that you have made, but it's apparently no longer being sent to the person who actually made the report. Now it's being sent to the reported person because that's whose name appears in the OP as the reporter. The wording of the auto PM needs to be updated.
 
Upvote 0

RND

Senior Veteran
Jul 20, 2006
7,807
145
Victorville, California, CorpUSA
Visit site
✟31,272.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
My information is correct, and you can stop being condescending anytime, RND. I did not realize until you posted this thread that the actual reporter was not still getting those auto-PMs, so thank you for bringing that to my attention.

Sophia, based on my initial post the information you provided was not correct because you offered an answer that had conflicting information in it. I'll remind you:

That's an automatic PM that's sent by the system whenever a report that you've made is closed.

As I stated in the OP I hadn't made any reports against anyone. So you are either attempting by your answer to impliy something happened that I didn't say happened or you simply didn't read the OP.

Either way, you were confused.

What you are not understanding is that the system now recognizes you as both the reporter and the reportee, even though obviously you could not have reported yourself.

No, I understand that point. My question, in the thread title, is "What's up with that?"

Yes, that's the same auto-PM that used to be sent to the actual reporter. "Your report" refers to a report that you have made, but it's apparently no longer being sent to the person who actually made the report. Now it's sent to the reported person because that's whose name appears in the OP as the reporter. The wording of the auto PM needs to be updated.

Apparently, based on your "apparently" you apparently did not know this. Sophia, as I said, in the future, could you please make sure you know what you are talking about before answering?

The moderator that contacted me after I posted this thread in relation to my PM to them cleared this up with me in just a matter of a feww short sentances. You are confusing the question I asked with you confusing answers.

Now, since you've managed to confuse this thread beyond belief could you now close this thread?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.